User talk:Dan9186/Archive 1

Wikimania in Atlanta!

Hi! I noticed your involvement on U.S. South-related articles, categories and WikiProjects, and I wanted to let you know about a bid we're formulating to get next year's Wikimania held in Atlanta! If you would like to help, be sure to sign your name to the "In Atlanta" section of the Southeast team portion of the bid if you're in town, or to the "Outside Atlanta" section if you still want to help but don't live in the city or the suburbs. If you would like to contribute more, please write on my talk page, the talk page of the bid, or join us at the #wikimania-atlanta IRC chat on freenode.org. Have a great day!

P.S. While this is a template for maximum efficiency, I would appreciate a note on my talk page so I know you got the message, and what you think. This is time-sensitive, so your urgent cooperation is appreciated. :) Mike H. I did "That's hot" first! 06:59, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:St jude childrens research hospital logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:St jude childrens research hospital logo.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 16:33, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Baptist memorial hospital memphis.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Baptist memorial hospital memphis.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI 16:36, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Regarding edits to Munford High School

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Dan9186! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule \..+-county\.com, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links guidelines for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! AntiSpamBot 15:40, 11 November 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:St jude childrens research hospital logo.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:St jude childrens research hospital logo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:20, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

Tennessee image comment

Hey Dan, thanks for adding the banner to these Tennessee images, but please do not add the banner to pages that are currently on Commons. If the little "Image" tab in the upper left corner is red, then the image does not actually exist on Wikipedia, and there is really no point in adding the banner (takes a bit of effort just to pull up the image, and most people aren't going to try that hard). So, just be careful, and if there are any questions, let me know. -- Huntster ^{T • @ • C} 21:27, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

Nope, everything is taken care of :) Thanks again for the work! -- Huntster ^{T • @ • C} 07:37, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:CBU Memphis.png

Thanks for uploading Image:CBU Memphis.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 06:34, 19 December 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to VandalProof!

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Dan9186! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply download and install VandalProof from our main page. If you have any questions, please feel free to contact me or any other moderator, or you can post a message on the discussion page. β^_command 03:05, 31 December 2007 (UTC)

Template:Infobox religious building

Regarding Template:Infobox religious building , is there an easy way of having the overall width of the template be variable rather than 300px, as you did with the image size: [1] I'm trying to use the infobox in some articles, but I find that because some of the values (like website name) are wide, they are forcing the descriptors onto two lines, which makes it kind of ugly. Jayjg ^(talk) 03:29, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

I have now added a field to specify a width for the infobox. It will default to 300px if you leave it blank but other wise for cosmetic purposes you can pick another size. If this isn't what you meant I may have misunderstood your request, so just let me know what I can help with. -- Dan9186^{(T • E • C)} January 3, 2008 04:49 (UTC)

Thanks, that's just what I was looking for! Jayjg ^(talk) 04:05, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Template:Infobox religious building

Thanks for granting my groundbreaking request. I think the change may have accidentally trashed all articles using the template. I went in to add it to Old Cathedral and the article is gone. All articles with a "link here" to the template are not working. Thanks again for your efforts. Americasroof (talk) 03:44, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

I'm not entirely sure but I think that may have been something to do with your computer because as I see it right now everything appears to be working as it should be. Or am I just oblivious and not realizing that the problem was fixed already? -- Dan9186^{(T • E • C)} January 18, 2008 19:43 (UTC)

Thanks again. Many, many, kudos. I responded on the religious building page and should have left a message here too. The problem was resolved shortly after I posted (and no further edits had been done to the template). Religious buildings sometimes take decades/centuries to build so I'm glad you did that. Thanks again. Americasroof (talk) 19:55, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

List of counties in Tennessee - Featured list nomination

Hey Dan, I have nominated the List of counties in Tennessee for featured list status. As you did a lot of work on that list, I thought to let you know. The discussion of the nomination takes place here: Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of counties in Tennessee. After the merge the list has featured quality, in my opinion. The further discussion in the process of the nomination can only help to meke it even better. The discussion is open for ten days, maybe you would like to contribute our opinion, too. Take care, doxTxob \ ^talk 23:23, 20 January 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know, I will make sure to keep an eye on it and provide any help or contributions I can. A good bit of work has gone into that list I'd love to see it noted. -- Dan9186^{(T • E • C)} January 22, 2008 21:48 (UTC)

WP:COUNTYLISTS

Thanks for updating Wikipedia:WikiProject U.S. counties/county lists. After your excellent work on TN, would you be willing to help bring the state remaining county lists up to featured status? If you do, just add your name to the list of particpants. Tompw (talk) (review) 15:08, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

Your opinion

What do you think should be done regarding the religious building infobox template when an article already has a National Register of Historic Places infobox template (e.g. Bialystoker Synagogue, The Actors Temple)? The religious building infobox template has some information on it that's not on the NRHP template, but there's obviously some overlap too. Jayjg ^(talk) 03:24, 7 January 2008 (UTC)=

Well You have the option of putting both and deeming which ever you want as the more important one to put at the top and putting the overlapping information in only one of the two. Another option that I would not be opposed to is creating a new infobox for such occasions. All of the religious building type infoboxes need cleaning, condensing, and reorganizing anyways. This could be just a step towards drawing all of them together and improving upon them. If you think that would be best over this next week I will try to pull a start of one together. It will be a slow process cause school starts back this week but give me some ideas of what you might want in the way of looks on it and I will try and make it happen. -- Dan9186^{(T • E • C)} January 7, 2008 08:42 (UTC)

It seems to me that the Religious Building infobox already has far more information in it than the NRHP infobox, with considerable overlap. It would make sense to me to incorporate NRHP information into a new section of the Religious Building infobox. What do you think? Jayjg ^(talk) 03:28, 8 January 2008 (UTC)

I don't see a lot of problems with it, the biggest thing would be that we not create a new section but incorporate the information into the already existing sections because it would be rather difficult to hide the unused sections with my current knowledge of templates. Past that I really see no issue with adding that information into it for cases where it would apply. -- Dan9186^{(T • E • C)} January 8, 2008 03:34 (UTC)

That makes sense. I look forward to seeing what you come up with. Jayjg ^(talk) 02:52, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

I have not made much progress in the way of making it happen yet, but the weekend is almost here. I was curious though what your thoughts were on what parameters should be included from the NHRP box. I would say that the nhrp_type should be set and not optional since it will always be a building. Other than that the ones I know should be added are added and refnum. -- Dan9186^{(T • E • C)} January 11, 2008 14:47 (UTC)

I think you are correct on both counts. Jayjg ^(talk) 23:07, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

What section do you think they should go in? Jayjg ^(talk) 01:07, 21 January 2008 (UTC)

The more I think about it and look at it I think it actually wouldn't be too awful to add in a separate section for the NHRP part and have a parameter that simply sets to display that section or not. Also I wish to apologize for taking so long to get on this, school has been a killer already in the few weeks of this semester. So don't think I have forgotten about this, it is merely a matter of finding the time. -- Dan9186^{(T • E • C)} January 22, 2008 21:51 (UTC)

There we go I have added what we have specified to the template. What I ended up doing is actually making a parameter to make the section optional so that it is its own section. If you put something into that parameter then it shows the section and for the time being the section only has two parameters the added and refnum. If we need to add any more in then we can add to it and such as you see fit. Let me know if you think anything else should be included. -- Dan9186^{(T • E • C)} January 22, 2008 22:43 (UTC)

That's great, thanks, I'll try it out! Jayjg ^(talk) 02:45, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

It works great! Would it be possible to make the other sections optional? See, for example, Baith Israel-Anshei Emeth Synagogue where the "Specifications" header is there without any detail, because we don't have that information. Jayjg ^(talk) 04:36, 23 January 2008 (UTC)

Yes it would be possible however the way I did it with this section was only by using the paremter nrhp for that. It does nothing more than flag whether to show that section or not. That would be the only way I could really do it easily for the other sections say specs or specifications and have it show if those are set to yes or something. So if that is how you would like to do it then I don't see why not. -- Dan9186^{(T • E • C)} January 23, 2008 14:13 (UTC)

I think that would be a good solution. You'd have to default it to "yes", though, to make sure that it didn't break all the current uses. Jayjg ^(talk) 02:58, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Done - I have added the ability to hide the architecture and specifications sections. They should default to yes and I have tested the fact that they hide the desired sections on the above mentioned article that is missing specification information. I specifically did not allow hiding the Basics section because that information should be required I think to include the infobox. However if you think other wise let me know and I will change it. Let me know what you think about all of this. Thanks. -- Dan9186^{(T • E • C)} January 28, 2008 14:54 (UTC)

The changes are great, and I think you're right, the other sections are optional, but there's no point in an infobox if you don't even know the basics about the structure. Thanks! Jayjg ^(talk) 01:20, 29 January 2008 (UTC)

O.K., I see one more thing; the NRHP infobox has a "Designated as a National Historic Landmark" variable too. Being added to the National Register of Historic Places is just the first step in getting designated as a National Historic Landmark, and there are a number of religious buildings that have both. Also, it would be really neat of the section heading could change - that is, if it is just registered on the National Register of Historic Places, then the headline would be "National Register of Historic Places", but if it also designated as a National Historic Landmark, then the headline would be "National Historic Landmark". Please let me know if you think this is doable. Jayjg ^(talk) 15:37, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

An update, I have the "designated" variable working, but not the changing headline. Jayjg ^(talk) 16:02, 3 February 2008 (UTC)

As far as doable, not a problem I will add that in if you don't as soon as I can. Right now my eye sight is limited to almost not being able to read due to a surgery I just had on Friday. As soon as my eye calms down I will jump right on it and see what I can do. If there are any other updates just let me know. -- Dan9186^{(T • E • C)} February 3, 2008 18:31 (UTC)

Thanks, I think I would mess it up if I tried. And I hope you recover quickly from the surgery - take your time to fully heal, don't strain your eye! Jayjg ^(talk) 03:07, 4 February 2008 (UTC)

I hope I'm not nagging, but have you had a chance to figure out how to make that National Historic Landmark/National Register of Historic Places section header work? Jayjg ^(talk) 02:59, 15 February 2008 (UTC)

Done — I have not had a chance to test it since I did this between classes but it should be working. If you get a chance test it out and make sure that it does what it is supposed to do. It should now be that if you have put in a value for when the place was designated then it should show the (U.S. National Historic Landmark) and if you have not put one in then it should show (U.S. National Register of Historic Places). Let me know if it needs any further work. -- Dan9186^{(T • E • C)} February 15, 2008 17:51 (UTC)

Thank you, but it doesn't seem to work; see, for example, Central Synagogue. Jayjg ^(talk) 02:10, 18 February 2008 (UTC)

It should really be fixed this time, I checked the article you showed wasn't working and it works now. I had misspelled the parameter, oops. So now that it is spelled right everything should be working as desired. Let me know. -- Dan9186^{(T • E • C)} February 18, 2008 22:45 (UTC)

Looks perfect. Great work! Thanks. Jayjg ^(talk) 03:35, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Re: List of Tennessee state symbols

I meant to toss you a message after I found that instance, but I was forcibly torn away from the computer by a rather bad phone call. I shouldn't have removed it in the first place without speaking with you, oops. In short, no, I do not believe that any state symbols should be placed under the project unless there are extenuating circumstances. As far as I can tell, ours would be the only project to do so, despite many items being symbols of other states. Further, looking at the two fish articles that were tagged (channel catfish and largemouth bass), Tennessee isn't mentioned once in the articles. Think of it this way; our project should cover locations, objects, events and other topics that are uniquely Tennessee-related, have a strong bearing on the state, or have been strongly influenced by the state. For example, that is why I don't tag articles of football players who happened to play for University of Tennessee when I am reviewing newly created recommended articles. That's what I view these generic symbols as being: just tangentially related. If a symbol is uniquely associated with Tennessee, maybe that would be okay, but most things aside from seals and songs are found over a wide geographical area and are associated any number of states/countries. — Huntster (t • @ • c) 12:16, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

I will take care of any that haven't already been dealt with then. As for talking with me first, you are the more experienced one and a better decision maker than I am you keep doing what you're doing and I will help out where I can. Sorry for the trouble and inconvenience. -- Dan9186^{(T • E • C)} February 6, 2008 02:11 (UTC)

Huntster something that I would like your oppinion on, these following articles do mention Tennessee in the articles. I will leave them to you to remove the banner from the ones you deem needing it. Otherwise I have removed the banner from the other ones I had tagged.

• Tulip poplar
• Iris
• Passion flower
• Zebra Swallowtail Butterfly

-- Dan9186^{(T • E • C)} February 6, 2008 03:37 (UTC)

Barnstar

Hey Dan9186, allow me to give you this award for your great work on merging the TN county related lists into a single list that contains all the relevant information about TN counties.

		The Working Man's Barnstar
		For great work on the List of counties in Tennessee, I award Dan9186 the Working Man's Barnstar. Your contributions helped to bring the article to featured status. doxTxob \ talk 04:41, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

Image maps

You will not believe how easy that is! The image map editor can be found on the German Wikipedia (also available in English language): Image map editor. You just need to load the image from the Wikipedia URL and click where you want to have the links. You can use squares, circles and polygons for irregular shapes. Pretty cool and very, very easy to use. The linked areas are shaded in the image while you are editing, so you can be sure not to forget any. Once you are done linking you just copy and paste the code where you want the image placed in the article. There is no need at all to figure out coordinates or calculate anything. Another great feature is that the coordinates are independent of the image size. They are based on the full size image, so if your image is displayed in a frame or smaller than original size all you need to do is: nothing! They adjust themselves. So you can just start making the image map and think about the size later. I wonder how that is done but I like it! Including testing the links I would say it took about two or maybe three hours for the TN counties.

I already found that there are a lot of county maps that do not have the image map feature. It is certainly very useful for that purpose. I did not make any yet because I am not sure which image makes the most sense. The bigger county maps as they are used (e.g. for the Kentucky list) in most county lists have somewhat redundant information when they are linked because the county names are already written on the map. And there is the size issue with the horizontal scroll bar. The population density map has a better size and provides extra information about the population, and I like the colors vs. the greyscale. doxTxob \ ^talk 22:07, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

That is a really neat little tool there. You aught to suggest something along the lines of what you've done for the Tennessee county list to the WP:COUNTYLISTS and see what they're response is to it. They might push for putting the population density map on all articles AND using it for the image map, who knows? I'm also glad to see that you're still around and working on stuff, I was afraid you might be leaving all together when you left the Tennessee project. -- Dan9186^{(T • E • C)} February 11, 2008 16:59 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Fit to kill.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Fit to kill.JPG. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 20:32, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Memphis disambiguation

Hello Dan, there is a discussion going on about how the Memphis page should be disambiguated (discussion takes place here: Naming conventions, Memphis). As I know that you are from Memphis, I thought you might like to voice your opinion there, too. doxTxob \ ^talk 19:32, 5 March 2008 (UTC)

I have made it to the conversation considerably late but I appreciate you letting me know. Whether I'll have anything useful to contribute or not I don't know, but certainly watch and help when I can. I was away on spring break when you posted this but I'm back now. -- Dan9186^{(T • E • C)} March 9, 2008 16:04 (UTC)

AfD nomination of St. Ann Catholic Church (Bartlett, Tennessee)

I have nominated St. Ann Catholic Church (Bartlett, Tennessee), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/St. Ann Catholic Church (Bartlett, Tennessee). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? TRAVELLINGCARI^{My story}_{Tell me yours} 21:08, 27 April 2008 (UTC)

Template:Countytabletop

Would it be possible to make the Etymology and Origing columns supressable (i.e. have some parameter which turns them off, so that they remain in place by default)? That way it can be used on the Hawaii and Lousianna lists. Tompw (talk) (review) 20:05, 28 April 2008 (UTC)

Template:Infobox religious building again

Hi Dan,

I've been using this template a lot, and I've noticed that when you don't include any architectural information, it leaves 2 blank lines at the bottom of the template. Is there any way of getting around that? Jayjg ^(talk) 03:09, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

I haven't been excessivley active as of late, I've had a lot going on. In the future you might do better to send me an e-mail. It was only by chance that I checked my messages today and saw this. I will take a look at the code later tonight and see what it will take for me to fix it. Thanks for letting me know. -- Dan9186^{(T • E • C)} August 5, 2008 20:38 (UTC)

Thanks Dan. Did you discover anything? Jayjg ^(talk) 23:59, 10 August 2008 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:CBU Memphis.png

Thanks for uploading File:CBU Memphis.png. You've indicated that the image is being used under a claim of fair use, but you have not provided an adequate explanation for why it meets Wikipedia's requirements for such images. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check

• That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for each article the image is used in.
• That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --FairuseBot (talk) 14:00, 3 January 2009 (UTC)

Image copyright problem with File:Bartlett Tennessee Flag.gif

Thanks for uploading File:Bartlett Tennessee Flag.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:29, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Wiki-meetup Nashville on Labor Day weekend!

Wiki-meetup Nashville will be September 5–6 (Labor Day weekend) 2009. No conference rooms or libraries. Food, beer and conversation, maybe even a show. So come either day or both! --EdwardsBot (talk) 00:12, 2 July 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Midsouth Makers

A tag has been placed on Midsouth Makers requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ~~ GB fan ~~ ^talk 22:45, 1 April 2010 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Midsouth Makers Badge Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Midsouth Makers Badge Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

• I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
• I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
• If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
• To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
• If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 15:38, 4 April 2010 (UTC)