Discussion edit


Contents: edit

Comment:

Hi. I moved your comments from the /GA1 page to the main talk page of Talk:Land value tax.

Arsenikk (talk) 17:23, 30 March 2011 (UTC)Reply


I see; thanks a lot.

DAB (talk) 18:01, 1 February 2012 (UTC)Reply



Your intentions edit

Hi. Do you have any intention of contributing constructively to Wikipedia in the near term? I'm still concerned that you're using your user page as a personal storage area for content that is not related to building the encyclopedia. This is not permitted, per the guidance that you have already seen. —SMALLJIM  16:53, 26 December 2012 (UTC)Reply


Dear SMALLJIM:

I intend to contribute constructively to Wikipedia with the very limited time and resources I have, ASAP. View my history of contributions from the start to get an idea how concening the Cause of Architecture and the KYMAK concept. That necessarily includes elements of Art, Science and Religion, at least as creative Architects (such as Frank Lloyd Wright) are trained and should understand. Early on it was suggested that I write an article about KYMAK; my user page is to provide information for that either by me or hopefully someone with better skills and resources at that than I have. I am an amateur at computer usage and in literary composition. Please bear with me; I accept of course that you are free to edit out anything you find not to be in accord with Wikipedia policy. Thank you for your interest and understanding.

DAB (talk) 15:39, 27 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

72.243.80.253 (talk) 16:38, 18 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your reply. I have reviewed your contributions and I think you might find it helpful to re-familiarise yourself with our editing policy (particularly relating to verifiability and no original research) before you make any substantial edits. You should definitely not try to write an article on KYMAK: WP:COI explains why not. I think it will be OK to leave your user page as it is now; I hope you can find the time to continue contributing to the encyclopedia. Best wishes  —SMALLJIM  10:59, 30 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Rational planning model edit

Rational planning model current article: January 23,2013 [1] (First draft: 27 November 2006 [2])

To understand and apply the rational planning model to the problem of designing and building cities, the study of the principles of good design as a knowledge base usually involves an academic term of four to six years in Architecture and Civil Engineerinng followed by three years of experience in the office of registered Architects in professional practice. DAB (talk) 16:58, 23 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your user page edit

Hello. I've deleted your user page in accordance with criterion WP:U5 because some 18 months after our conversation, you have made very few significant attempts to contribute to the encyclopedia, and you are still using the page to host and add to your personal material. There are plenty of other free websites where you can host your content without our restrictions: I'll be happy to make the content briefly available to you if you want to copy it for that purpose.  —SMALLJIM  18:52, 12 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Greetings: Early on it was suggested that I write an article about KYMAK; my user page is to provide information for that if you will bear with me; I accept of course that you are free to edit out anything you find not to be in accord with Wikipedia policy. I am making efforts to eliminate the problem you pose. Thank you for your interest and understanding.

DAB (talk) 17:20, 13 May 2014 (UTC) DAB (talk) 15:32, 15 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

NOte: I have renewed my original geocities website ( now geocities.ws ) and have removed the links referring to my user page. People who were coming here in the emergency caused by the failure of the 110mb website can now go to http://www.geocities.ws/douglas36601/KYMAK.html

DAB (talk) 16:24, 23 July 2014 (UTC) DAB (talk) 16:27, 23 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

I've replied to your December '14 request on my talk page.  —SMALLJIM  17:00, 22 February 2015 (UTC)Reply