DJ Chair

Don't act like this is personal

First, let's get one thing straight: You don't call me "Quinn". I don't know/care if you're trying to get friendly or what. We're not friends and you're going to get any further with me that way. Second, you seem to be the one taking things personally. Have you considered the possibility that you're just messing up repeatedly? Honestly, I couldn't care less about your status or the time you've spent here. I've called administrators on their screwups, okay? Third, you were the one who wanted to immaturely call me a "Spaz". Don't be embarrassed by your own comments and actions. Forth, I'll address who I want how I want if I believe their making non-productive or foolish edits. It's not a matter of being a bully or strict about policy, either. Your past edits have damaged Wikipedia, which is, in turn, built on the hard work of others. It's like this: whatever reason you're editting for, you seem to respect Wikipedia or its users. I noticed you blanked your talk page. That's mature. Wikipedia would prefer that you leave comments there and, eventually, archive them. Fifth, I do have a life and several other articles and users to interact with. You're just a minor annoyance at the moment, and only due to your behavior/edits. That whole "it's them/him, not me" attitude? It doesn't fly. Trust me, I know from experience. Remember, this is collaboration; a joint venture. You cannot just do things your way 24/7. Now, if you'll try to work on your act rather than going on the extremely hostile defensive everytime I address your mistakes, I'll try to lighten up...just a bit.

In closing, all I'll say is this: you can look at this however you want, but if you keep acting and editting the way you are now, I'm not the only one who's gonna "get on [your] case". ACS (Wikipedian); Talk to the Ace. See what I've edited. 23:18, 5 October 2006 (UTC)

Hmm, how to respond... lets see. First, I'll call you Quinn, because that's your name, and you were courteous/foolish enough to post it here on Wikipedia. Second, were I trying to be friendly with you, I wouldn't be dropping terms like "Spaz." Third, I have a right to take things personal when your comments on my edits become more and more insulting and direct. Call me old fashioned, but that's just the way I see it. Forth, I'm not even sure what "don't be embarrassed by your own comments and actions" means. I've posted again and again, and have never apologized... I'm not sure where you got embarrassment, but you must have misread it. Fifth, when have I ever damaged wikipedia? Can you show me where one of my comments, or edits irrevocably negated the work of other contributors? Cause, honestly, the only person here that's complained is you. As for blanking my Talk page, I do believe it to be mature. Since your comment was, in my opinion, drivel and full of disrespect, added nothing to any article, and furthered no constructive future. If you honestly believe that this is a joint venture, as I believe you do, then instead of removing my comments/edits willy-nilly, make a remark on the Talk page of that article and allow others to voice their opinion, or allow me to explain my actions if they confuse you.

Your advice can go both ways, until I hear from other users on any article I edit, or you do something that garners respect, I'm not going to do much to alter my actions. --DJ Chair 01:19, 6 October 2006 (UTC)

Healing factor

Gave up on your theories and research? Mo would be ashamed. ACS (Wikipedian); Talk to the Ace. See what I've edited.

Nah, it isn't that. I'm currently in the middle of a huge move with my wife, and all my books <sad> are packed away. I won't be able to find that information until the 1st of November (unless I'm lucky and stumble across a copy of it at the library, or Barnes & Noble.) But, don't lose heart, the first thing I'll do once I get my book out, is post the reference information under Healing Factor. Promise. --DJ Chair 04:34, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Aww, dude. You're married? Gees. Had I known, I would have been a lot easier on ya. Well, hope it all goes well. ACS (Wikipedian); Talk to the Ace. See what I've edited. 06:26, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Ha, had I known you would have been easier on me, I would have told you. Yeah, my wife has been going gangbusters on the packing, and the first things she stowed were all my precious books. --DJ Chair 12:12, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Original research

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as those in Sylar, but we regretfully cannot accept original research. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your information. Thanks for your efforts, and happy editing! --Madchester 18:28, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Award

Please check out your userpage. youngamerican (yo) 15:35, 18 October 2006 (UTC)

Heroes

Guide to layout states a recomended order, and ive also never seen an article palce references afetr ext. links. thanks/Fenton, Matthew Lexic Dark 52278 Alpha 771 21:19, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Speedster (comics)

Hi. Sorry to bother you, but it looks we might have an edit war at speedster (comics) between myself and Ace Class Shadow. If you could chime in with your opinion on that article’s talk page, so that we can achieve some sort of consensus, it would be appreciated. Thanks. Nightscream 10:28, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

I'll take a look --DJ Chair 15:49, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Courtesy note about ArbCom proceeding

Hiya, sorry to bother you, but I wanted to drop you a courtesy note to let you know about a current ArbCom proceeding where your name is briefly mentioned. If you are not familiar with ArbCom, please do not be alarmed. In real-world terms, this is sort of like stating that your name is being mentioned as one of the witnesses (or possibly even bystanders) to a case. ArbCom cases tend to be somewhat large and chaotic, but if you would like to watch the proceedings, you may wish to set Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Naming Conventions on your watchlist. Your own name is probably somewhere on the evidence page, or possibly at the workshop page. The case is currently in an "evidence-gathering" phase and has not yet reached the state of actual comment by arbitrators yet. My guess is it'll probably run for another month or so before a decision is finalized.

No action is needed on your part, this is just a courtesy note. If you would like to participate in the case though, you are more than welcome. You may wish to offer a statement with your view of events at the case's talkpage, or you can add evidence or participate in the workshop. Many editors routinely participate in ArbCom proceedings regardless of whether or not they are directly involved in the case, since ArbCom rulings are considered "binding" and may have ramifications in other parts of Wikipedia.

If you have any questions, let me know, or feel free to post at Wikipedia talk:Requests for arbitration/Naming Conventions. Best, Elonka 05:56, 22 December 2006 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:22, 23 November 2015 (UTC)