User:Sayouloveme edit

Looking at the user page for this other account, it looks like you've created a new account (this one) in order to have a new username. Am I correct? Just so you know for future reference: We have the ability to change your username for you so that you're not starting completely over from 0 edits and having to move from one account to the other. Your user, user talk, sandbox, and other user pages also move to the new username for you when it's changed. Basically, you keep everything; just the username is changed. No worries though; it's good that you're starting over now and with only 26 edits instead of doing this later where you may have many more. If you have any questions, please let me know. :-) Cheers - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 22:49, 23 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Combo Panda, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit

 

Hi Combo Panda! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like 78.26 (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:05, 24 January 2019 (UTC)

January 2019 edit

  This is your only warning; if you make personal attacks on others again, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. Rschen7754 00:44, 27 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Welcome! edit

Hello, Combo Panda, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by adding a space and four tildes ( ~~~~) to the end; this will automatically insert your username and a timestamp to help keep conversations organized. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask at the Teahouse, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! —[AlanM1(talk)]— 12:25, 14 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

We are volunteers, not paid employees edit

There is no rush to answer your questions for any of us, nor is it a big issue if you stop using the site. Please do not try and hold things over our head, it won't work, and will result in a much less prompt answer to your questions, as many will opt to ignore you. I will be nice, and answer, for now.

First, the table of contents:
The table of contents is added to articles automatically once it contains 2 or more section headers.
Second, the draft thing:
Simply create the article in mainspace, i.e. at Brand New Article Here. You'll have the option to do so if you have 10 or more edits. However, I strongly recommend against this.
There's a little heart button in the toolbar on other user's talkpages. This allows you to give barnstars and badges (Do not give me any, please.)
--MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) (talk) 14:09, 14 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

  • The reply above is extremely polite. I will be less polite, because if you are still young (as I guess based on your posts), I think it is better to be clear and to use simple English.
"Answer me or I leave you forever" is a bad post for multiple reasons. There are reasons of politeness, morals, ethics etc. but let us ignore them and focus purely on efficiency. First, you would have obtained help without making threats, and doing so makes it less likely that people like you and help you. Second, that threat is empty (which means: go ahead, we don't care), because we Wikipedians (or at least I) do not care a lot that you stay; you might think that if you leave, it will be a terrible loss for us, but you need to convince us of that, and coming with such a bad attitude is not really convincing. Third, the threat is not credible (which means: I do not think you are actually going to carry it out), because a long experience has shown that among editors who do leave Wikipedia, most do so without warning and without returning, while those who warn and threaten usually come back. TigraanClick here to contact me 14:55, 14 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Welcome edit

Hello, Combo Panda, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) (talk) 14:09, 14 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help

January 2020 edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 15:59, 16 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

I dont know what to call this title edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Combo Panda (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I want to give badges to people and I want to edit mistakes not make actual articles and also i'm still young Combo Panda (talk) 21:10, 16 January 2020 (UTC)Combo PandaReply

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 21:11, 16 January 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I dont know what to call this title 2 edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Combo Panda (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I dont wanna be blocked because i dont stand it Combo Panda (talk) 21:14, 16 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

It's clear that you currently lack the maturity to edit Wikipedia. In, say, five or ten years, you might well be a productive contributor, but at the present moment your presence here is a net negative. I see no likelihood of this changing in the immediate future, nor of you making an actionable unblock appeal, so I have removed your access to edit this page. Once you've grown up a bit, you can make a new appeal via the UTRS process if you wish to return. Yunshui  23:20, 16 January 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This is not a valid reason to be unblocked, and I imagine you will stay blocked if this is all you can say. --MoonyTheDwarf (Braden N.) (talk) 21:15, 16 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

RIP edit

RIP ME editing (thanks to a wikipedian called Yamla -_-)



2019-2020 Combo Panda (talk) 22:47, 16 January 2020 (UTC)Combo PandaReply