Cmcphillips

Welcome!

Hello, Cmcphillips, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Starting an article
• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kinu ^t/_c 17:01, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Joe pulizzi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Joe pulizzi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.) or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. --Kinu ^t/_c 17:01, 30 October 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Joe Pulizzi for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Joe Pulizzi is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joe Pulizzi (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Kinu ^t/_c 02:58, 1 November 2012 (UTC)

Joe Pulizzi

A problem right off the bat with the Joe Pulizzi page is that you have outside web links cited directly in the text. This is something that should be done only when absolutely necessary, which is to say almost never. Take a look at what I did with the bibliography on the Jillian Michaels page. You can easily find the necessary information (publisher, ISBN, etc.) on Amazon. That's how I knew Pulizzi was published by McGraw-Hill.

The other thing you want to avoid is writing an article, especially a biographical article, like a corporate PR piece. I'll be the first to tell you that 95 percent of the "COI" debate here is utter nonsense. That said, I do firmly believe Wikipedia should be written as objectively as possible. We're here to inform, not promote. That has to be in the front of your mind whenever you write something here. In other words, write the biography more like you would for a serious newspaper. Yeah, it'll be a bit dry and bland, but that's actually what you want. Faustus37 (talk) 01:27, 2 November 2012 (UTC)