Cioppino123

May 2023

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Cioppino, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Knowledgegatherer23 (talk) 21:13, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

Under pillar two of the five pillars off wikipedia you may not express opinions on articles. Knowledgegatherer23 (talk) 21:13, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

It is a fact that it is a must try dish. Who goes to SF without trying it? Cioppino123 (talk) 21:17, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

Unfortunately, that is not correct. Please read Neutrality Policy. Knowledgegatherer23 (talk) 00:24, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Unfortunately you're not correct either. Cioppino has been called a "must-try" dish by many travel writers. This is a fact, this is not an opinion. And this is neutral. Be a knowledge gatherer like we all are on this website. Live up to your name. Cioppino123 (talk) 14:40, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Plateau de fruits de mer. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Renewal6 (talk) 21:14, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

Watch Mr. Bean's holiday first before you accuse me of vandalism. I am here to help. Cioppino123 (talk) 21:16, 23 May 2023 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Plateau de fruits de mer, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 16:54, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Ok I will cite the movie. Cioppino123 (talk) 18:35, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

It needs coverage in a secondary source to demonstrate that it is noteworthy. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 18:38, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Ok thanks Cioppino123 (talk) 19:35, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Cioppino123/sandbox

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. A tag has been placed on User:Cioppino123/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Cheers, atque supra! Fakescientist8000 16:51, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Why Cioppino123 (talk) 19:38, 24 May 2023 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to Liancourt Rocks, a topic designated as contentious. This standard message is designed as an introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially-designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

-- Shadow of the Starlit Sky 01:03, 25 May 2023 (UTC)

ik Cioppino123 (talk) 15:48, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

Notice of Arbitration Enforcement noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. The thread is Cioppino123. Thank you. -- Shadow of the Starlit Sky 16:15, 27 May 2023 (UTC)

May 2023

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 17:14, 27 May 2023 (UTC)