User talk:Chris G/Archives/2010/March
 | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The Wikipedia Signpost: 1 March 2010
- Reference desk: Wikipedia Reference Desk quality analyzed
- News and notes: Usability, 15M articles, Vandalism research award, and more
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Severe Weather
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
- Technology report: Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News
The Wikipedia Signpost: 8 March 2010
- News and notes: Financial statements, discussions, milestones
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Java
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
request for input on bot-like project
You are invited to join the discussion at User_talk:Ludwigs2#proposal_-_need_collab. Ludwigs2 06:12, 14 March 2010 (UTC) (Using {{Please see}})
The Wikipedia Signpost: 15 March 2010
- News and notes: A Wikiversity controversy, Wikimedian-in-Residence, image donation, editing contest, WMF jobs
- Dispatches: GA Sweeps end
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Ireland
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation
User:Chris G Bot 3 tweak
Can you have Chris G Bot 3 give us a little more time to get back and mark something done before it hops in and marks it done on WP:CHU? On renames which require more time to type something (or actually move all the user pages, as was the case here), it can take a couple minutes or so for a 'crat to get back and mark something done. Perhaps a wait of 10 minutes would be good? Thanks! ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 01:05, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
Fixed - the bot will now only mark a request as done if it is at least an hour old. If anything else comes up feel free to ping me (interestingly, if you had performed that rename a minute later you would have missed the bot's run and had a whole hour to mark the request as done) --Chris 09:40, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
- Thanks! ···日本穣? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe 18:30, 19 March 2010 (UTC)
Looking at recreating a page that was deleted. Going to follow guidelines to be sure fits under wikipedia rules. Page in question is: Paolo I. with many akas. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Blueskinge (talk • contribs) 01:08, 21 March 2010 (UTC)
The Wikipedia Signpost: 22 March 2010
- Wikipedia-Books: Wikipedia-Books: Proposed deletion process extended, cleanup efforts
- News and notes: Explicit image featured on Wikipedia's main page
- WikiProject report: Percy Jackson Task Force
- Features and admins: Approved this week
- Arbitration report: The Report on Lengthy Litigation