edit
 
File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Visifire.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. — neuro(talk) 17:31, 2 March 2009 (UTC)Reply

Re:Deletion of my entry on LogMyTask

edit

Hi Chiragpinjar. Please note that Wikipedia has a deletion policy in which articles which consist of spam/advertising are speedy deleted per deletion criterion G11. I will not undelete your article but I'll provide you with a copy of the text below so you can revise the text.

{{Infobox Software
| name                   = LogMyTask
| logo = [[Image:LMT Logo.png]]
| screenshot             = 
| caption                = 
| collapsible            = 
| author                 = 
| developer              = Webyog Softworks Pvt. Ltd.
| released               = 
| latest release version = 
| latest release date    = Aug 2009
| latest preview version = 
| latest preview date    = 
| frequently updated     = 
| programming language   = 
| operating system       = Any
| platform               = 
| size                   = 
| status                 = Active
| genre                  = Time Tracker, Task Manager
| website                = [http://www.logmytask.com LogMyTask.com] 
}}

'''LogMyTask''' (LMT) is a collaboration friendly time tracking & task management [[web application]].

With Twitter-type simplicity for data entry, it can answer the following questions:

*How much time one is spending on a particular task?
*What is keeping one busy?
*What ones coworkers are spending time on?
*What group of tasks are consuming the majority of coworkers’ time?

== Features == 

*Nifty calendar view for the logged tasks
*Team feature for collaboration
*Tagging feature to categorize tasks

== External links ==
*[http://www.logmytask.com/ LogMyTask]
*[http://webworkerdaily.com/2009/08/10/logmytask-launches-exclusive-closed-beta-invitation-for-wwd-readers/ WebWorkerDaily on LogMyTask]
*[http://blog.logmytask.com/2009/08/10/why-did-we-create-logmytask/ The story behind LogMyTask]

You are certainly more than welcome to resubmit the article, but revise the text so that it conforms with the policies and guidelines noted at WP:ADS and WP:MOS. Otherwise, you run the risk of having the article deleted again. Let me know if you have any questions/concerns. Regards, FASTILY (TALK) 07:15, 24 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree File:Visifire.jpg

edit

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Visifire.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --IngerAlHaosului (talk) 13:07, 18 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

non-free rational on free image

edit

You recently uploaded File:File:Visifire.jpg tagged with a nonfree rational and a free license, if you have done this because the upload form added it automatically and you don't believe that the screenshot is non-free then read below.


 ::PS.

 

Thank you for uploading free images/media to Wikipedia! As you may know, there is another Wikimedia Foundation project called Wikimedia Commons, a central media repository for all free media. In future, please upload media there instead (see m:Help:Unified login). That way, all of the other language Wikipedias can use them too, as well as our many sister projects. This will also allow our visitors to search for, view and use our media in one central location. If you wish to move previous uploads to Commons, see Wikipedia:Moving images to the Commons (you may view previous uploads by going to your user contributions on the left and choosing the 'file' namespace from the drop down box (or see [1]). Please note that non-free content, such as images claimed as fair use, cannot be uploaded to the Wikimedia Commons. Help us spread the word about Commons by informing other users, and please continue uploading!--IngerAlHaosului (talk) 18:48, 2 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of IssueBurner

edit
 

The article IssueBurner has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No assertion of notability per WP:GNG; no significant coverage online from WP:Reliable sources; borderline WP:SPAM

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Gurt Posh (talk) 09:39, 8 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of IssueBurner

edit
 

The article IssueBurner has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

insufficient no evidence that it meets the notability criteria

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:53, 9 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of IssueBurner for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article IssueBurner is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IssueBurner until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Gurt Posh (talk) 12:37, 15 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of CloudMagic

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on CloudMagic, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Ravendrop 00:08, 4 October 2011 (UTC)Reply