Chinemeremprince

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ingenuity was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Chinemeremprince/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Chinemeremprince/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

>>> Ingenuity.talk(); 13:58, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Chinemeremprince! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! >>> Ingenuity.talk(); 13:58, 5 March 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding User:Chinemeremprince/sandbox

Hello, Chinemeremprince. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Chinemeremprince/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:03, 5 August 2022 (UTC)

Odd edit summaries

Could you please explain what your edit summaries "WPWP4OWR2023" refer to, and why you are inserting images without context into articles? Your edits are in several cases the same as User:PassionateLibrarian's, and your use of edit summaries is similarly odd, and you are re-inserting some content they inserted that has already been deleted once. Please have a look at WP:MEAT and indicate if you are involved in some sort of training course with PassionateLibrarian. SandyGeorgia (Talk) 14:25, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

Thank you for the message you sent to me. We had a Campaign tagged Wikipedia pages wanting photos (WPWP 2023). The focus was to enrich Wikipedia pages with visuals. I, PassionateLibrarian participated in the campaign and training. PassionateLibrarian (talk) 12:18, 6 September 2023 (UTC)

User:SandyGeorgia, I bet it's some Wiki project somewhere--we had something similar a few years ago, causing considerable disruption. Chinemerem, your captions are also problematic. I just removed/tweaked a few of them--a building is not a newspaper. User:Pelmeen10, you may want to weigh in as well. Drmies (talk) 16:14, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

Chinemeremprince, STOP, right now, or I will have to block you. You need to talk to us before you go on. Drmies (talk) 16:31, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

User:FMSky, you may have thoughts here as well. Drmies (talk) 16:41, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

This is this from this weird picture competition on wikipedia commons. its the same as every year. tons of users inserting spam pics without any context in hundreds of articles. best to just revert and block --FMSky (talk) 16:44, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/WPWPIG2023 --FMSky (talk) 16:45, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

Drmies see discussion at USer talk:Malcolmxl5. it looks like this may be part of https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/WPWPIG2023 (in which case, they need to get better trained). SandyGeorgia (Talk) 16:44, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

@Drmies@SandyGeorgia I'm so sorry for my misconducts. I was participating in the WPWP Campaign and didn't know I was contributing wrongly. Also, I was ignorant of the messages on my Talk Page. So sorry for inconveniences. I've now begin to learn the intricacies of contributing to the WIKIPEDIA project and also responding to my Talk Page as well. Chinemeremprince (talk) 07:39, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

August 2023

You have been blocked from editing from certain namespaces ((Article)) for a period of 72 hours for disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 16:37, 22 August 2023 (UTC)

Hi Chinemeremprince! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Crédit Agricole (cycling team) that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. Paulpat99 (talk) 06:55, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that one or more recent edit(s) you made did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary, and then click the "Save" button. Thanks! Materialscientist (talk) 07:27, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

I've gone and re-blocked you, indefinitely this time. I don't normally deal with images due to my blindness but when every single one of your last fifty edits has been undone (not by me), there's a major, major problem. You are part of a highly problematic contest. Graham87 08:42, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

FYI @Materialscientist:, who mass-reverted a lot of these edits (I noticed one on my watchlist). See the above links to the contest details on Meta. Graham87 08:48, 27 August 2023 (UTC)

@Graham87 I'm so sorry I disrupted the Wikipedia page. I was participating in the WPWP Campaign and was adding the hashtags. I didn't know it was not reflecting on my Edit Summary. Also, I was ignorant of the warning messages on my talk page. I'm so sorry for the inconveniences. Chinemeremprince (talk) 07:32, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

The phrase "WPWP4OWR2023" (in one of your last edit summaries) does not contain a hash tag ("#"). Either deliberately or not, you circumvented an edit filter designed to stop you from making the sorts of edits you were doing. I'm not sure that unblocking you will really help the encyclopedia. Graham87 (talk) 08:14, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

Graham87, how does someone not see the warnings on their talk page? Drmies (talk) 12:41, 21 September 2023 (UTC)

@DrmiesI was an newbie then and didn't know anything about Talk Page as the time all the warning messages were sent. It was when I now reached out to an experienced Wikimedian that I got to know about the 'Talk Page' as my 'Inbox & Notification Box'. I've learnt my lesson now. Chinemeremprince (talk) 11:53, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

@Graham87the commission of the hashtag sign was not a deliberate act. It was an oversight which I acknowledged was from my end and I have alsoo realized that the '#' sign is a necessity in this kind of Campaign Edit Summary. I'm so sorry for the inconveniences this might have caused. I didn't mean to damage the Wikipedia page. Chinemeremprince (talk) 11:56, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

OK. Place an unblock request. Let someone else look at it. I trust next time you will be more aware of your editing environment. Good luck. Drmies (talk) 12:45, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

@Drmies How do I place unblock, I will also use it to learn new something on the Wiki space. Chinemeremprince (talk) 12:53, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

Sweet Jesus, it's in the block template. Drmies (talk) 12:56, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

"If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}."

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Chinemeremprince (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

To be able to contribute on the Wikipedia Page again, now that I've learnt how to contribute positively Chinemeremprince (talk) 14:41, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 14:48, 22 September 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Chinemeremprince, you need to be more comprehensive in an unblock request. PLEASE follow the guidelines, and Yamla's notes, in full. Drmies (talk) 16:45, 22 September 2023 (UTC)