ChairYeoman
.
Hi. Even good faith has its limits. You are right to suspect spam. I have PRODed the article. --Kudpung (talk) 05:03, 30 December 2010 (UTC)
Day9 and Tasteless edit
The reason I moved the article to day9 was because of the WP:COMMONNAME policy. In most of the resources available he is referred to as day[9], but because of technical limitations there cannot be a [] symbols. Although there are certainly different interpretations to all of these guidelines, I do not appreciate your comment "MOS damnit" which implies that this is blatantly wrong: sure you may not agree with the interpretation of policy, but it's certainly not blatantly wrong. NativeForeigner Talk/Contribs 17:36, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
Tasteless edit
You asked in December that the article not be PROD'd but it still lacks third party sources establishing notability. Please let me know if you still plan to improve it, thanks.Jonathanwallace (talk) 14:12, 24 February 2011 (UTC)