Ccmpg
Disambiguation link notification for June 4 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alife Cathedral, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alife (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 4 June 2019 (UTC)
Hello. I notice that you're making town plans (c21 so far) showing the locations of Italian cathedrals and adding them not only to the individual cathedral articles but also to the List of cathedrals in Italy. I should let you know out of courtesy that I've removed them from the list. There are several reasons for this, but principally because the list entries themselves are quite brief and these large plans completely dominate them; they distort the appearance and reduce the usability of the page overall. Also, if you add one to every single entry it will make the page extremely large for little gain, and possibly even push it over the top size limit. If you feel strongly that the list needs to contain extra geographical information, you could consider adding the relevant {{coord}} link to each entry instead. Ingratis (talk) 14:25, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Ingratis:As you wrote : "removed unnecessary individual maps", i would also add :"removed unnecessary contributor"! On wikipedia, we often delete without discussing or asking before .... discouraging. Ccmpg (talk) 15:09, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
- I am very sorry for my tactless wording. There is nothing unnecessary about the maps themselves, which add to the individual cathedral articles, where I hope you will continue to create them. My concern, as above and also on the Talk page, is about their effect en masse on what is a very long central reference page. Once again, apologies: I find it v difficult to find the balance between discussion and WP:BOLD.Ingratis (talk) 15:42, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
- @Ingratis: We can very well think that maps are a problem on a list, but what is discouraging is your way of proceeding : I delete a few hours of work without warning or notice. I explain then only.
- Waiting for someone else to think that the problem is the same for articles on cathedrals ...... If you think the maps bring something, I'll let you add them. Ccmpg (talk) 18:32, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
- I am very sorry for my tactless wording. There is nothing unnecessary about the maps themselves, which add to the individual cathedral articles, where I hope you will continue to create them. My concern, as above and also on the Talk page, is about their effect en masse on what is a very long central reference page. Once again, apologies: I find it v difficult to find the balance between discussion and WP:BOLD.Ingratis (talk) 15:42, 8 June 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message edit
 | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message edit
| | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit
| | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |