User talk:Carbrera/Archive 8

Latest comment: 7 years ago by Numerounovedant in topic Your GA nomination of If I Close My Eyes

Your GA nomination of Sky Fits Heaven edit

The article Sky Fits Heaven you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Sky Fits Heaven for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aoba47 -- Aoba47 (talk) 04:41, 26 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Carbrera, will you be addressing the comments for the above review? —IB [ Poke ] 05:55, 30 November 2016 (UTC)Reply
@IndianBio: Most likely; I apologize. I've been extremely caught up in school work so most of my time here has been devoted to my sandbox. But that'll change shortly (hopefully). I'll get to it as soon as I some more time on my hands. Regards, Carbrera (talk) 05:56, 30 November 2016 (UTC).Reply
Ok understood, I can help you out if you wish :) —IB [ Poke ] 06:19, 30 November 2016 (UTC)Reply
Feel free to take your time. I was planning on keeping the review open as I understand that it is a busy time of the year for everyone. A majority of the article is already in order, and my comments are about relatively minor points that should be easily corrected. Good luck with your school work! If you would like IB, feel free to address any of my comments if Carbrera is alright with it. Aoba47 (talk) 18:57, 30 November 2016 (UTC)Reply
@IndianBio: It would be greatly appreciated if you can help out, although it is by no means necessary. Carbrera (talk) 05:07, 4 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

4th Annual GA Cup - Round 1 edit

WikiProject Good Articles's 2016-2017 GA Cup
 

Greetings, GA Cup competitors!

November 28, 2016 was supposed to mark the end of the first round. However, we needed 16 competitors to move on, and currently only 10 have completed articles. Thus, the judges have come together to let the participants decide what we shall do. Please complete this quick survey to let us know whether you would like a holiday break.

There will be two options for what we will do next in terms of Round 2 depending on the results of this poll.

  • If the survey indicates that the competitors want a break, we will have a 2nd round after the break ends with just the 10 competitors who have reviewed articles, starting in January (with a specific date TBA).
  • If the survey does not indicate that participants want a break, we will extend Round 1 until the end of December.

We apologize for sending out this newsletter late. Cheers from 3family6, Figureskatingfan, Jaguar, MrWooHoo, and Zwerg Nase!

To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletters, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:00, 5 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Sky Fits Heaven edit

The article Sky Fits Heaven you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Sky Fits Heaven for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aoba47 -- Aoba47 (talk) 15:02, 5 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Baby Don't Lie edit

RE your question: Sales links to Amazon.com. Per WP:SPAM, WP:EXT:

"This specifically includes e-commerce and other commercial-sales links, which are prohibited in External links but allowed in footnoted citations."

There should not be external links to commercial sites like that. Hannibal Smith ❯❯❯ 11:13, 17 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

@John "Hannibal" Smith: The "external links" section doesn't link to Amazon.com, but rather the "references" section does, which is allowed. Carbrera (talk) 11:20, 17 December 2016 (UTC)Reply
Ok, no problem. Thanks for clarifying. Apparently my understanding was incorrect. I've been noticing some sneaky links to Amazon, so I was using the External Links Search tool to help identify more pages with spam links. It looks like I was getting too hardcore. I'll go back and double-check some of my previous edits. Thanks again for the insight. Hannibal Smith ❯❯❯ 11:27, 17 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Get Enough edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Get Enough you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 06:41, 23 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Get Enough edit

The article Get Enough you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Get Enough for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 18:21, 23 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Get Enough edit

The article Get Enough you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Get Enough for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 22:41, 23 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of Get Enough edit

  Hello! Your submission of Get Enough at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk) 08:56, 25 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of I Hate December edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article I Hate December you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of -- (talk) 11:01, 25 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Edgeoftheocean.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Edgeoftheocean.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:35, 26 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Lately (EP) edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Lately (EP) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 19:01, 26 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Lately (EP) edit

The article Lately (EP) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Lately (EP) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 11:21, 27 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Start a War (Gwen Stefani song) edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Start a War (Gwen Stefani song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aoba47 -- Aoba47 (talk) 17:01, 27 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Start a War (Gwen Stefani song) edit

The article Start a War (Gwen Stefani song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Start a War (Gwen Stefani song) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aoba47 -- Aoba47 (talk) 17:41, 27 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Start a War (Gwen Stefani song) edit

The article Start a War (Gwen Stefani song) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Start a War (Gwen Stefani song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Aoba47 -- Aoba47 (talk) 01:41, 28 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Lately (EP) edit

The article Lately (EP) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Lately (EP) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 07:01, 28 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of I Hate December edit

The article I Hate December you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:I Hate December for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of -- (talk) 05:41, 29 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

GA request edit

Hi! I saw one of your edits on Saxobeats. Maybe you have time to GA review it? If not, then disregard this! Cartoon network freak (talk) 07:42, 29 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

@Cartoon network freak: Unfortunately IndianBio already took over the review. Lemme know the next time you nominate something! Carbrera (talk) 00:13, 30 December 2016 (UTC)Reply
Actually, I've nominated an article today, if you're interested: Alexandra Stan Marcel Prodan controversy. Best, Cartoon network freak (talk) 12:14, 1 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of I've Got a Feeling (Ivy song) edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article I've Got a Feeling (Ivy song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 01:41, 30 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Digging Your Scene edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Digging Your Scene you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 08:01, 31 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Digging Your Scene edit

The article Digging Your Scene you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Digging Your Scene for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 08:41, 31 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Digging Your Scene edit

The article Digging Your Scene you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Digging Your Scene for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 17:01, 31 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of The Way We Were (song) edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article The Way We Were (song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 22:01, 31 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of What U Workin' With? edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article What U Workin' With? you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of -- (talk) 03:02, 1 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

4th GA Cup - Round 2 edit

WikiProject Good Articles's 2016-2017 GA Cup
 

Greetings, GA Cup competitors!

December 29th marked the end of the first round, after it was extended from its previously scheduled conclusion at the end of November. Because of the smaller pool of contestants this year, it was decided to keep sign-ups open throughout the month of December.

This extension proved to be very helpful as we saw that more users signed up and completed many reviews. Krishna Chaitanya Velaga earned an impressive 402 points, followed by Cartoon network freak with a close 338 points. Shearonink who signed up after our extension was in third with 170 points.

We had a rule clarification in Round 1 which was that many articles were being passed with blatant copyright violations and plagarism occurring in the articles. Thus, the judges have concluded that if an article is passed even if it has a copyright violation/plagarism, we will not provide points for that article as it wouldn't be considered a "complete review" under the scoring rules.

In the end, 94 articles were reviewed by 14 users who will all advance to Round 2. The judges had planned on having 16 contestants advance but since only 14 did, we are changing the pools in this round. We will be having 2 pools of 3 and 2 pools of 4 in Round 2, with the top 2 in each pool advancing to Round 3 as well as the top participant ("9th place") of all remaining competitors. Round 2 will begin on January 1 at 00:00:00 UTC and will end on January 29 at 23:59:59 UTC. Information about Round 2 and the pools can be found here.

Cheers from 3family6, Figureskatingfan, Jaguar, MrWooHoo, and Zwerg Nase!

To subscribe or unsubscribe to future GA Cup newsletters, please add or remove your name to our mailing list. If you are a participant, you will be on the mailing list no matter what as this is the easiest way to communicate between all participants.

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:21, 1 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Russell family (Passions) - featured article candidate edit

I've nominated the article about the Russell family (Passions) for Featured Article consideration. I would really appreciate any comments or feedback on this nomination, especially since you have helped me with its GA review. I understand that you are busy so it is completely okay if you are unable to do this. I apologize for any inconvenience.

The link is here if you are interested: Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Russell family (Passions)/archive1. Thank you for your time. I would be more than happy to help you with any of your projects in return. Aoba47 (talk) 03:42, 2 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Happy New Year, Carbrera edit

 

Your GA nomination of I've Got a Feeling (Ivy song) edit

The article I've Got a Feeling (Ivy song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:I've Got a Feeling (Ivy song) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 19:41, 2 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of The Way We Were (song) edit

The article The Way We Were (song) you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:The Way We Were (song) for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 13:20, 3 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Speak Out Now edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Speak Out Now you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 10:01, 4 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of The Way We Were (song) edit

The article The Way We Were (song) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:The Way We Were (song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 07:21, 7 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of I've Got a Feeling (Ivy song) edit

The article I've Got a Feeling (Ivy song) you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:I've Got a Feeling (Ivy song) for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of MarioSoulTruthFan -- MarioSoulTruthFan (talk) 16:01, 7 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of If I Close My Eyes edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article If I Close My Eyes you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Numerounovedant -- Numerounovedant (talk) 18:02, 14 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

no wp:self published source edit

Per the discussion at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Albums/Archive_46#Piero_Scaruffi_-_Final_Verdict_on_using_him_as_a_source_in_reviews there's a very clear consensus here that Scaruffi is not to be used as a source in music/album articles in any capacity. So please, do not add his opinions anymore. It is a wp:self published source. Since this is a long running dispute, any contributor warned by the situation and who doesn't respect it, would encounter sanctions and could be blocked from editing. Thanks. You've been informed because you used this source [ https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Get_Enough&diff=755794472&oldid=726127526 here]. Woovee (talk) 20:15, 14 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Speak Out Now edit

The article Speak Out Now you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold  . The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Speak Out Now for things which need to be addressed. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 13:41, 15 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

DYK nomination of Start a War (Gwen Stefani song) edit

  Hello! Your submission of Start a War (Gwen Stefani song) at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! SoWhy 15:14, 15 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

GAR for Alexandra Stan v. Marcel Prodan edit

Alexandra Stan v. Marcel Prodan, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. BlueMoonset (talk) 16:06, 16 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

@BlueMoonset: I'm afraid I don't agree with the way you're handling this situation. I would much rather have opened up the review myself (like you pointed out on GA2), but I was very inactive last night and solely working on my sandbox, ignoring my watchlist to get more work done. I really feel that I gave the article a thorough review, even though I know you think the opposite. As much as GAR can be a useful process, in this case, I find it a waste of time as really only one editor is necessary to make any changes to the prose. Additionally, editors can go back and forth and prose quality all day. One editor can find a statement to be concise and clear while the other one finds it to be worthy of garbage slop. I don't mean to be rude, but I want to express my opinion as well. Regards, Carbrera (talk) 17:41, 16 January 2017 (UTC).Reply
Carbrera, if you had reopened the review then and there—it would have taken less time than you spent making the edits on the article—I would have done nothing more beyond perhaps posting my concerns. Indeed, I would much rather you had done so. But you made no response after what I had said was a problematic review of an article written in mediocre English, and were clearly working elsewhere on Wikipedia in your sandbox for several hours rather than undoing the GA listing. GAR was the only recourse left, since the article is so far from meeting the GA criteria. It isn't a matter of pings, it's that there were significant issues and you were ignoring this problem in favor of other projects. It's obvious that we have very differing views of the article: you think the article is fine, while I think the prose is generally substandard and has inconsistencies that should have been flagged. (Given its condition when nominated, I probably would have quickfailed it had I been the reviewer.) I also don't mean to be rude, but there are objective standards in terms of the grammar and prose, and this doesn't meet them; it isn't even a borderline case. As the GA Cup points on the review have been withdrawn, it's clear I'm not the only one who thinks so. BlueMoonset (talk) 18:53, 16 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of What U Workin' With? edit

The article What U Workin' With? you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:What U Workin' With? for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of -- (talk) 02:21, 17 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Start a War (Gwen Stefani song) edit

On 18 January 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Start a War (Gwen Stefani song), which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Gwen Stefani's unreleased song "Start a War" was compared to Sia Furler's solo work? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Start a War (Gwen Stefani song). You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Start a War (Gwen Stefani song)), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Schwede66 00:01, 18 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of Speak Out Now edit

The article Speak Out Now you nominated as a good article has passed  ; see Talk:Speak Out Now for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Cartoon network freak -- Cartoon network freak (talk) 06:21, 18 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

GARs edit

Be advised that I'm removing your submission of Alexandra Stan v. Marcel Prodan/GA1 from the WikiCup as you failed to properly follow the GA criteria when evaluating the article, specifically the prose requirement. Please be more thorough when reviewing GA nominations.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 15:28, 18 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

I've also deleted your DYK nomination for Start a War (Gwen Stefani song) as that was nominated in 2016.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 22:50, 18 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Cabrera, I have a question. edit

I'm not asking you to review it for positive status, but do you think my article Pink and Blue is good enough to pass to positive status? I'm iffy specifically on the critical reception section. Aleccat 01:25, 19 January 2017 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Aleccat (talkcontribs)

@Aleccat: – I think it's a great idea that you nominated it for GA status! If you're ever unsure about an article you wrote, I'd recommend taking it over to WP:GUILD and any possible prose/reference errors will be fixed for you by a professional copyeditor. Regarding the critical reception section, I don't see any huge issues with it, minus that ACT should be FACT". Regards, Carbrera (talk) 01:30, 19 January 2017 (UTC).Reply

Thank you much! Aleccat 01:49, 19 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Private Practice (season 1) - featured list candidate edit

I've nominated the list for Private Practice (season 1) for Featured List consideration. I would really appreciate any comments or feedback on this nomination. I understand that you are busy so it is completely okay if you are unable to do this. I apologize for any inconvenience. The link is here if you are interested: Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/Private Practice (season 1)/archive1. Thank you for your time. I would be more than happy to help you with any of your projects in return. Aoba47 (talk) 22:11, 20 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

@Aoba47: Yes, I will give it glance within the next two days. Perhaps you could help my FAC for "Make Me Like You" receive a bit more attention? I'm worried it's gonna end without consensus again. Thanks and regards, Carbrera (talk) 00:47, 22 January 2017 (UTC).Reply
Of course, I will look through the article and FAC as soon as I have the chance. Thank you! Aoba47 (talk) 00:54, 22 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Misery (Gwen Stefani song) edit

Hello:

The copy edit that you requested from the Guild of Copy Editors of the article Misery (Gwen Stefani song) has been completed.

Please let me know if you have any questions or concerns.

Regards,

Twofingered Typist (talk) 21:53, 22 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Another question from Aleccat edit

(Sorry in advance if it seems I'm pestering you, I haven't had many experiences with many Wikipedians, let alone respectable ones who can discuss topics with me and give reasoning for such.)

Hi Carbrera, Aleccat again, with another question regarding something different. Could you give me your thoughts on a post I made in Ultraviolence's talk page regarding the singles vs. promotional singles in Ultraviolence? If not, I understand entirely. Thanks for all, Aleccat 02:56, 24 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of All in Love Is Fair (song) edit

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article All in Love Is Fair (song) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria.   This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HeyJude70 -- HeyJude70 (talk) 05:01, 28 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

You've got mail! edit

 
Hello, Carbrera. Please check your email; you've got mail! The subject is The Wikipedia Library - Newspapers.com.
Message added 04:02, 30 January 2017 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

--Cameron11598 (Talk) 04:02, 30 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

Make Me Like You edit

Hi. I was just wondering if you were aware that the video for "Make Me Like You" was nominated for an award from the Make-Up Artists and Hair Stylists Guild? (Here's a source: [1]). Normally I'd add this myself, but seeing as the article is at FAC, I thought I'd leave it up to you to work it in. Great job with the article btw and I hope it passes its FA review! - JuneGloom07 Talk 18:49, 31 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

@JuneGloom07:. OMG thank you so much for the heads up! I had no clue. How considerate of you! I will definitely add this in the article! Thanks, Carbrera (talk) 23:04, 31 January 2017 (UTC).Reply

DYK for What U Workin' With? edit

On 1 February 2017, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article What U Workin' With?, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Gwen Stefani and Justin Timberlake's song "What U Workin' With?" was first revealed through a surprise post on Timberlake's Instagram account? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/What U Workin' With?. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, What U Workin' With?), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:14, 1 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your GA nomination of If I Close My Eyes edit

The article If I Close My Eyes you nominated as a good article has failed  ; see Talk:If I Close My Eyes for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of Numerounovedant -- Numerounovedant (talk) 06:21, 1 February 2017 (UTC)Reply