AfC notification: User:Camuvin/sandbox has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Camuvin/sandbox. Thanks! DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:38, 11 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

April 2023 edit

  Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Mario Brero, from its old location at User:Camuvin/sandbox. This has been done because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. - RichT|C|E-Mail 18:18, 11 April 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mario Brero (July 22) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 05:38, 22 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Camuvin! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 05:38, 22 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

merge edit

I hope you can help with the merge ! Wuerzele (talk) 23:02, 25 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I saw you simply pasted your draft article into the existing article. That is no merge !--Wuerzele (talk) 17:41, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your text is extremely wordy and IMO largely unencylopedic. It contains extensive quotes, lots of factual repetitions. What you should have done instead is looking at is what is already there and woven in what additional info you have. Your choice of sections is odd (e.g. present activities). An entire paragraph is basically uncited- triple reference at the end not withstanding, as the reader doesnt know which of the 3 references cites what detail. You should really source each sentence, unless one paragraph is sourced by one reference, see WP:cite. As far as style: You use inline external links which are disallowed, and repeat Wikipedia links, see WP:MOS You use present tense. This should be avoided, UNLESS you write {{as of| month/year}}, so that the reader of tomorrow has a reference point of when this was written. Lastly, please familiarize yourself with the use of quotation marks on WP; This is not a newspaper.

All in all, your "dump" will cost a lot of time to clean up the article.--Wuerzele (talk) 22:12, 1 August 2023 (UTC)Reply