By the Beard of Worf!

"Noncanonical"

Please stop removing content simply because it is "noncanonical", especially if it is reliably sourced. If this was a fansite that might be acceptable, but this is an encyclopedia. Wikipedia reports objectively on the entirety of a subject and isn't restricted by what is considered "canonical". There is also dispute about what is considered canon (read Star Trek). If you want to identify something as non-canon, you also must back that up with a reliable source, not just your opinion. But regardless, noncanonical is not a sufficient reason to remove content. Thanks. Sundayclose (talk) 01:18, 5 October 2022 (UTC)

The information was explicitly labeled non-canonical. But regardless, I appreciate your comment and will instead re-arrange, as well as make the unrelated edits undone by the blanket revert. Thank you! By the Beard of Worf! (talk) 21:19, 5 October 2022 (UTC)