Supernatural edit

You enquired why User:Verbal made this revert of your edit. Please note that his edit comment directed you to WP:BRD. I believe that should answer your question. It is indeed normal to revert to longstanding form pending fuller discussion. You were quite correct to start that discussion on the article talkpage, but we have no deadline. Discussion need not be hasty, and may sometimes continue for years. The references that you proposed in your edit were to WP articles. We deliberately avoid doing this to prevent circular referencing, or tautology. LeadSongDog come howl! 15:47, 27 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

You then asked on my talkpage:

Your reply appears automated. The links on which you base your objection to my clarification of wording were from the version with the unclear wording - I did not change them and therefore suspect you are not reading the material prior to criticizing.

Is this accurate/mistaken?BurntSynapse (talk) 19:57, 27 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

It appears you directed your question to the wrong editor, though I may be failing to grasp your intent. LeadSongDog come howl! 19:05, 28 July 2010 (UTC)Reply