Brokal

Brokal, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Brokal! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Rosetta Barnstar
	Excellent work, cheers! AdventurousSquirrel (talk) 08:42, 1 February 2013 (UTC)

DOB for Joan Stewart

When you added a date of birth for Joan Stewart, Countess of Morton and I tagged it with and added in the edit comment “attribution needed to show not synthesis or OR.” You cited sources in the note and in any other venue you’d have made your point. But by taking the note in Maxwell, which stated “…must have been of at least mature age at the time of her marriage, because, eighteen years before, she had been betrothed…” That gets in the ballpark, but he doesn't pin down an age we can attribute to him. Also, your citation to the social history of marriages on p. 271 by Ewen was also good except she didn't mention Joan on that page. She also was discussing marriages whereas Maxwell stated she was betrothed eighteen years earlier. Cokayne confirmed this stating "contracted to marry". A contract or betrothal can and was occasionally entered into by both fathers when one or both parties were still infants. Taken together, Maxwell’s note and Ewen’s commentary you made a good point logically, but unfortunately not to WP guidelines and policies. When I mentioned it could not be synthesis or OR, I assumed you were familiar with both. WP:SYN says: "Do not combine material from multiple sources to reach or imply a conclusion not explicitly stated by any of the sources. If one reliable source says A, and another reliable source says B, do not join A and B together to imply a conclusion C that is not mentioned by either of the sources. This would be a synthesis of published material to advance a new position, which is original research" (OR). See also WP:NOR. So unless you can find a reliable source (it wasn't in any of the sources I consulted) that states she was born about 1432 we can’t use it and it needs to be removed. However, there is another way. MOS:DOB states: “When the year of birth is completely unknown, it should be extrapolated from earliest known period of activity”. By subtracting Maxwell’s eighteen years from the date of her marriage you get before 1440 (the earliest known period of activity or mention). This may not be far off because Joan may have been betrothed from early childhood, even infancy and if born circa 1440 it would explain why the marriage had not yet taken place in 1446 in that she was not yet of of an age where she could marry. So unless or until you can find a reliable source giving a date of birth, we’ll use the Manual of Style’s Dates of birth and death method and I’ll go ahead and change it to that date and modify the note to remove anything that might be considered OR. If you have any questions, let me know here or email me from my userpage. Thanks Bear♦patch talk 00:31, 4 March 2013 (UTC)

Ways to improve Itzgründisch dialect

Hi, I'm Anne Delong. Brokal, thanks for creating Itzgründisch dialect!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Hello! You have plenty of documents listed, but there is no way to tell which facts in the article are supported by the references. Please add inline citations to help verify the information. Thanks! —Anne Delong (talk) 15:21, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

François Blouet de Camilly

Hello. I have asked you a few questions at Template:Did_you_know_nominations/François_Blouet_de_Camilly, if you would care to comment. Kindly, Iselilja (talk) 05:03, 7 January 2014 (UTC)

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Baldwin V, Count of Flanders may have broken the syntax by modifying 4 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• including Frederick Clifton Pierce and Sir Charles Oman, believe that there was a fourth child — [[Richard the Forester[[, who participated in the [[Battle of Hastings]] with his brother-in-law, William the Conqueror,

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:21, 29 August 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:59, 24 November 2015 (UTC)