Reply edit

Maybe adding more to the Marketing section, and reworking some of the sentences. And maybe just looking over the article and fixing some minor articles, and try making some sentences not sound repetitive, such as, as mentioned on the FA review, "nouns ending with ing" (filming, going etc.). Basically, I want some prose reworked, and to make it sound REALLY good, in your point of view, maybe sort of like what Igor has done before. Thanks! (Forgot that you won't be notified when I reply in my own talk page) Fanaction2031 (talk) 05:22, 3 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

No it's alright, I'll let you work for today. I'll probably just edit the lead for now. Fanaction2031 (talk) 22:30, 3 September 2011 (UTC)Reply
Working on the sources. Those are just placeholders. Fanaction2031 (talk) 02:29, 11 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Chuck Versus the Cliffhanger edit

Lead

"Chuck Versus the Cliffhanger" is the fourth season finale of the American action-comedy NBC television series Chuck.

  • 2 - de facto? Some viewers may need clarification.
  • 3 - Maybe you can describe in a very short sentence who Stephen J. Bartowski is?
  • 4 - One of the things I've noticed is that the term season is used too much in the lead.
  • 5 - "Chuck revolves around the Intersect, a government database designed by Stephen J. Bartowski. In the pilot episode of the series, Stephen's son Chuck (Zachary Levi) receives the database and accidentally uploads it to his brain. Chuck is then forced from his life as an employee at the big-box store Buy More to the spy world. By the fourth season, Chuck is a Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) agent and is engaged to one of his handlers, Sarah Walker (Yvonne Strahovski)."
  • 5 (Continued) - I don't think this is needed. Instead, in the "plot" section of the Lead, you can describe the characters such as "Chuck". (Example: In the season, Chuck, a once computer expert, now Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) agent, and his team fulfill Stephen Bartowski's last wish to destroy Volkoff Industries, led by international arms dealer Alexei Volkoff (Timothy Dalton).

I will review more tomorrow. These are MY opinions and thoughts from someone who has never watched Chuck before.

-- Fanaction2031 (talk) 20:49, 7 September 2011 (UTC)"Reply

Planning on reviewing more today. After the wedding I attend to, I will continue to review the article. Fanaction2031 (talk) 15:05, 10 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Lead (continued)

  • 6 - "Chuck Versus the Cliffhanger" received overwhelmingly positive reviews from critics. --> I think this might contradict the neutral point of view WP:Standard.

That's pretty much it I can detect so far. I will let you know if I see anything else in the article that doesn't belong. Fanaction2031 (talk) 23:49, 10 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

Small Dark of the Moon request edit

Would you mind copyediting the Themes and inspirations section I've recently created? I know I don't have the legitimate intelligence to make grammar perfect. Fanaction2031 (talk) 02:13, 11 September 2011 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Good Article Barnstar
For your significant contributions that helped promote Captain America: The First Avenger to good article status.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 21:11, 26 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Determining when a film has left theaters edit

If you look at the bottom of the Domestic Summary section here it tells you how long it was in theaters. It doesn't give you a date in Cowboy and Aliens case unlike here on Fast Five which says exactly when it left, but looking at C&B's weekend breakdown, the last financial record was made at the end of October. Of course this only matters for US/Canada release. Internationally, it was still apparently playing as late as November 6.Darkwarriorblake (talk) 01:06, 19 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Cowboy & Aliens in release at the box office edit

About knowing if a film is still in release. Box Office Mojo will list a "Close Date" like this (under Domestic Summary). But that's just for the North America theaters, the foreign total may still be updated for months after. —Mike Allen 23:15, 18 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Copycat :P Darkwarriorblake (talk) 01:06, 19 November 2011 (UTC)Reply
I'm sorry, I didn't even notice your message. I just hit the new section tab at the top of the page and typed away. Well, Boycool I hope all of this answered your question. LOL —Mike Allen 01:41, 19 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Cowboys & Aliens passed GA edit

Congratulations! A very interesting explanation of the film and makes me want to see it!

Best wishes, MathewTownsend (talk) 19:40, 29 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

Pointed editing edit

Your edit summaries have a tendency to be outright rude and obnoxious.
Mind your manners, Varlaam (talk) 04:57, 10 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Original Barnstar
I like your work, and your profile, and you should keep it up! Americus55 (talk) 00:28, 5 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

The Dark Knight Rises edit

LOL, I was adding all the refs. But I guess you did that for me already. I hate edit conflicts... But let me know if you need any sources. Fanaction2031 (talk) 05:14, 26 February 2012 (UTC)Reply

The Prestige edit

Can you produce an image which shows that shows

- "each of the several dozen tanks in the abandoned building contained a drowned Angier" ?

First, there is only one body shown. It is NOT shown that "each" tank has a body. Second, there are about a dozen tanks shown, not several dozen.

- "one of a dozen tanks in the abandoned building contained a drowned Angier."

Feel free to inspect the frame at 1:29 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GZc3EsElqeA

If you can find other bodies, or count more than twelve tanks, I will retract my claim.

24.118.168.217 (talk) 18:17, 28 February 2012 (UTC)Reply


Much better, thanks 24.118.168.217 (talk) 00:01, 1 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

A thousand apologies!! edit

I just wanted to drop by and give you my infinite apologies for 'changing information' and adding a duplicate reference. If I ever again I am foolish enough to think that I am scholarly enough to add edit an article about an upcoming movie about a billionaire that dresses up like a bat and solves crimes, I will scour the reference list and compare it to my own. As an act of contrition, I've boiled the hand I used to make the edit in hot lead, while reciting 'I shall not inconvenience more prolific editors, or may God have mercy on my soul' rhythmically at the top of my lungs, and banging a drum with my free, non-editing hand for one hour.

Thank you for your time; while I am unworthy I pray for your forgiveness.

--Williamsburgland (talk) 22:03, 4 March 2012 (UTC)Reply


I'm glad you laughed, and no worries at all. Thx man. --Williamsburgland (talk) 22:23, 4 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Administrator intervention edit

Do you know how to report a user for being an uncompromising douche? He isn't going to stop until he gets his way. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 02:23, 17 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Which heading? Darkwarriorblake (talk) 02:35, 17 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
Yes they are :P I just didn't get what was so nice about it. My bad, thanks for the info. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 02:40, 17 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
I did report him to AiV for vandalism instead but tbh it's just kinda become funny now. He's warning an admin for vandalism and calling him a tyrant. Darkwarriorblake (talk) 03:23, 17 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Neutral notice edit

This is a neutral notice to frequent editors of The Avengers (2012 film) that the page may be in danger of an edit-war, with one editor unilaterally changing the first line in a way contrary to consensus determined by admin J Greb here. For the sake of the article's stability, editors may wish to page attention to this page.--Tenebrae (talk) 13:15, 18 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

Awake Template edit

I suggest that you vote to Keep the Awake template, i see on the talk page that you don't want it to be deleted. Tate Brandley Stockwell 00:52, 28 May 2012 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Awake Proposal edit

I see you have worked on serveal of articles on Awake. Feel free to vote here for it to have a WikiProject. TBrandley • talk • contributions 07:07, 3 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Title for "Nolan Films" section in the Batman film series article edit

There have been three changes to this title today, two by IP's and one by you. I'd like to invite you to discuss on the talk page to reach a consensus on what the title should be; until then I've simply reverted to what it was (The Dark Knight Trilogy) to avoid (hopefully) further changes. --Williamsburgland (talk) 00:49, 9 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:Bradley Cooper as Faceman Peck 2010.png) edit

  Thanks for uploading File:Bradley Cooper as Faceman Peck 2010.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:12, 14 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:Tim Dunigan as Faceman Peck 1983.jpg) edit

  Thanks for uploading File:Tim Dunigan as Faceman Peck 1983.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:13, 14 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:A-Team Corvette.jpg) edit

  Thanks for uploading File:A-Team Corvette.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:04, 15 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Good Article Barnstar
For your significant contributions that helped promote The Avengers (2012 film) to good article status.--TriiipleThreat (talk) 18:57, 12 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:Quinton Jackson as B.A. Baracus 2010.jpg) edit

  Thanks for uploading File:Quinton Jackson as B.A. Baracus 2010.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Werieth (talk) 14:52, 5 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Death Race 2 poster.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Death Race 2 poster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 01:04, 2 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:ChuckVersustheFamilyVolkoff.png edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:ChuckVersustheFamilyVolkoff.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Josh Milburn (talk) 17:28, 8 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:ChuckVersustheWeddingPlanner.jpg edit

 

Thank you for uploading File:ChuckVersustheWeddingPlanner.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Josh Milburn (talk) 17:30, 8 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:23, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Clark Gregg as Phil Coulson.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Clark Gregg as Phil Coulson.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Elisfkc (talk) 19:46, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Clark Gregg as Phil Coulson.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Clark Gregg as Phil Coulson.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 11:15, 8 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Non-free rationale for File:The Ring.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:The Ring.jpg. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Closedmouth (talk) 12:49, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:TheATeamVillains.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:TheATeamVillains.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:25, 31 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit

Hello, Boycool42. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

Unclaimed/Claimed edit

I completely agree with you about UCF. I dealt with this when Penn State went 13-0 and got screwed back in 1994 (AP Ranked them #2. But, NY Times ranked them #1). See their wiki, it's still legitimately an Unclaimed National Championship. Alabama has done this a lot of times when some BS Newspaper in Tuscaloosa votes them #1..

Now with the Playoffs, it would be much harder for UCF to be considered a Claimed National Championship. Listing UCF as 2017 national champions and you'll have people reverting it daily. List them as unclaimed national champions and that will be there forever. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wdwpsu (talkcontribs) 02:48, 3 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

RfC at Talk:Max Landis edit

Greetings, there is a Request for Comment ongoing at Max Landis, and you have been interested in the issue at hand so I figured I would let you know. Your opinion would be greatly valued. -- Wilner (Speak to me) 09:22, 6 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hi, I'm a writer at Sports Illustrated hoping to get in touch with you for a story on the UCF football team. Could you find me on Twitter at @stephapstein? (I'm new to this so not sure I want to post my email address on what appears to be an open page, but happy to DM it to you so we can proceed.) Thank you! Stephaniesi (talk) 16:16, 10 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Christopher Cantwell edit

Hello, please see my post here: Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Noticeboard#Christopher Cantwell. Erik (talk | contrib) (ping me) 16:36, 12 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, Boycool42. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Jeffster.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Jeffster.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:35, 10 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Volkoff Industries for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Volkoff Industries is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Volkoff Industries until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – sgeureka tc 12:23, 16 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Volkoff logo.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Volkoff logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:01, 24 January 2020 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:MisterHan.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:MisterHan.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:27, 10 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Sharlto Copley as H.M. Murdock 2010.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Sharlto Copley as H.M. Murdock 2010.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:54, 17 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:BuyMoreLogo.png edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:BuyMoreLogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:04, 12 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:ChuckSensei.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:ChuckSensei.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:08, 31 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:ChuckTronposter.jpeg edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:ChuckTronposter.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:09, 31 December 2023 (UTC)Reply