Bobdevani
Speedy deletion of Jeremy Lee Associates edit
A tag has been placed on Jeremy Lee Associates, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Twinzor Say hi! - Do I suck or rock? 12:45, 2 October 2008 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Rob, since I am not related to your agency or Guy Browning, I have no conflict of interest. I'm just a regular Wikipedia "editor", making minor additions to articles that pique my interest. I added back the linky to Guy Browning's page at www.jla.co.uk based on my discussion here:
But I suspect the link to Smokehouse would be a much harder sell to the Wiki hardcore.
Remember, editing articles where you have some direct business (or other) relationship with the subject will likely irritate Wikipedia purists, so you'll have to work around that. Links should be as "non-Spammy" as possible, and though the link I added back from www.jla.co.uk is a close call, it does contain, in my opinion, enough biographical information to pass.
It occurs to me that people in your position might want to consider these things when working with clients so as to craft Web pages that are more likely to "pass muster" with the stricter editors here at Wikipedia. A good solid biography and bibliography wouldn't hurt in most cases, a CV, links to YouTube files of the client's work (if such content exists) that sort of thing. Things that make the Web page more usful than just advertising, something to reduce the "spammy" level.
The section "Radio" seems confusing. If you care to share with me the facts for that section, maybe I can write something more understandable. Good luck! Proxy User (talk) 02:16, 27 November 2008 (UTC)