Bnotepr, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Bnotepr! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Come join other new editors at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a space where new editors can get help from other new editors. These editors have also just begun editing Wikipedia; they may have had similar experiences as you. Come share your experiences, ask questions, and get advice from your peers. I hope to see you there! I JethroBT (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:34, 18 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Talkback

edit
 
Hello, Bnotepr. You have new messages at St170e's talk page.
Message added 15:39, 22 October 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

st170etalk 15:39, 22 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Talkback

edit
 
Hello, Bnotepr. You have new messages at St170e's talk page.
Message added 16:28, 27 October 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

st170etalk 16:28, 27 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Hi. There are several new sources. Can you please check?? Thanks in advance Bnotepr (talk) 03:50, 23 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Talkback

edit
 
Hello, Bnotepr. You have new messages at Phantomsteve's talk page.
Message added 11:15, 28 October 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

Spamming user talk pages

edit

Don't randomly post to a bunch of users' talk pages that you want them to look over your draft. If you do so again, you may be blocked. Jackmcbarn (talk) 04:24, 23 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Sorry Bnotepr (talk) 05:23, 23 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Please take note of the above. Canvassing is frowned upon. I'll just say that I can't see a credible claim that the article meets the notability guidelines for music. Although you gave references, many seemed to be self-editable, sales sites, blogs or websites of dubious provenance and credibility, and may not be adequate as independent verifiable sources. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:32, 23 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

I got it and sorry. Thanks for the advice and your time Bnotepr (talk) 08:12, 23 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Regards; Is ok if has to be deleted. Sorry for message a couple of Administrators almost the same message. The draft has more than 5 weeks and I was looking for help. If the article do not pass the criteria is ok to delete it, no hard feelings. I can start another draft from the scratch in the future, and sorry to bother each of you, sincerely Bnotepr (talk) 10:23, 23 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cirex (January 26)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Chris troutman was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. Chris Troutman (talk) 16:41, 26 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

Regards. Can someone help me with the citations? Much appreciated! Bnotepr (talk) 08:24, 12 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Cirex has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Cirex. Thanks! --George (Talk · Contribs · CentralAuth · Log) 17:21, 25 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cirex (February 26)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Primefac was: You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. Primefac (talk) 13:40, 26 February 2015 (UTC)Reply

Cirex

edit

Hi. I have accepted the article, so it now should now be indexed by search engines and such. Cheers, --George (Talk · Contribs · CentralAuth · Log) 06:56, 14 March 2015 (UTC)Reply