Hello, Blitzer99, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

float
float

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome!

— Nathan (talk) / 01:24, 27 June 2006 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Spens Clause (July 16) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 04:10, 16 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Spens Clause has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Spens Clause. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 19:01, 16 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Copyright problem on Draft:Spens Clause edit

Material you included in the above article appears to have been copied from the copyright web pages https://wiki.treasurers.org/wiki/Spens_clause, http://www.ey.com/Publication/vwLUAssets/EY-infrastructure-investments-for-insurers/$File/EY-infrastructure-investments-for-insurers.pdf and https://assets.kpmg.com/content/dam/kpmg/pdf/2016/04/TPS_2015.pdf. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:40, 17 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Spens clause has been accepted edit

 
Spens clause, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

jcc (tea and biscuits) 20:22, 28 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brunner Investment Trust (November 14) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Compusolus were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Compusolus (talk) 11:52, 14 November 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Blitzer99! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Compusolus (talk) 11:52, 14 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Brunner Investment Trust edit

  Hello, Blitzer99. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Brunner Investment Trust, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:32, 2 May 2023 (UTC)Reply

Request reconsideration. This is a major listed company and the article has 11 references. Blitzer99 (talk) 15:37, 11 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Year of the Locust (February 11) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 13:23, 11 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Year of the Locust (February 11) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:51, 11 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Year of the Locust has been accepted edit

 
The Year of the Locust, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 20:21, 12 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Brunner Investment Trust (March 25) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jonathan Deamer was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Jonathan Deamer (talk) 20:32, 25 March 2024 (UTC)Reply