BitcoinrealityCheck

Welcome!

Hello, BitcoinrealityCheck, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Getting started
• Introduction to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! --John (talk) 19:16, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

March 2014

Please don't add your original research on Wikipedia. In future, please show the source for any information you add, so that it is verifiable for users. --John (talk) 19:16, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Disruptive editing

You're not only adding original research you're removing verifiable and cited statements that have been already discussed and vetted ad nauseam. Please just post on Talk:Bitcoin the things that you have problems with and we'll work together to make the article better. I consider your current actions to be disruptive editing. Chris Arnesen 20:39, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

It is verifiable in the international press - I can quote if you like - that the US defined bitcoin as a property not a currency. You cannot possible have a problem with that. BitcoinrealityCheck (talk) 20:42, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Do you call what the US decides "disruptive" ?? BitcoinrealityCheck (talk) 20:42, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

I left a quote on the Bitcoin article that the US IRS regards bitcoin as a property and not a currency

I left a quote on Bitcoin to prove that the US IRS regard~s it as a property and not a currency. Surely you do not have a problem with this? BitcoinrealityCheck (talk) 21:03, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Not necessarily. Is it verifiable? --John (talk) 21:07, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

Yes it is verifiable: Check the reference, namely Business Insider, I left on the Bitcoin article. Here is another reference for you: . It is very strange that you have problems with verifiable references: just google:"US IRS regards Bitcoin as property and not a currency" and you will get thousands of references. BitcoinrealityCheck (talk) 21:13, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

There is no problem with your addition now that you have added a reference. I have moved it out of the lead paragraph to where it belongs in the article. Thanks for your addition. --John (talk) 21:15, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

The US economy is the biggest economy in the world. Do you disagree? It belongs in the lead paragraph.You are very disruptive. BitcoinrealityCheck (talk) 21:18, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

"Disruptive" has a very specific meaning on Wikipedia and it is a behavior that can result in a block. I advise yourself to get familiar with what it means by reading Wikipedia:Disruptive editing so that you can avoid being disruptive. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:51, 28 March 2014 (UTC)

BitcoinrealityCheck, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi BitcoinrealityCheck! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Writ Keeper (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:07, 29 March 2014 (UTC)