Orphaned non-free media (Image:Sh2.jpg) edit

  Thanks for uploading Image:Sh2.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 02:07, 7 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

April 2008 edit

  Please do not add inappropriate images to Wikipedia, as you did to Demi Lovato; it is considered to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. NrDg 03:56, 13 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

can you tell me what was inappropriate??
It was not a free use image as required to illustrate a bio article. See WP:IUP and WP:FUC for more details. The release you placed on the picture restricted it to non-commercial use only which also means we can't use it and the release was invalid anyway as the web site did not own the copyright to that picture so can't give a release. The picture is from a photoshoot and the website just put the picture up, they don't own it. Basically any picture you find on the web is extremely unlikely to be usable in a bio article. What we want are pictures you took with your own camera or pictures where the photographer has explicitly released it for free use. Some pictures on flickr sometimes are released that way. We appreciate your efforts to find a picture, but copyright is a touchy area for wiki so we have to be careful. --NrDg 04:14, 13 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Demi Lovato edit

I also removed the Forbes information. You did a good cite but you can't copy text from the reference. You have to use your own words or indicate it is a quote. Also that web site is not classed as being reliable so the reference can't be used. See WP:RS. There are lots of other sources for that info that do meet the reliable source requirement. --NrDg 04:14, 13 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

The changes you made are better in that you didn't just copy text. The reference you used is still a problem as fan-sites are not reliable sources of informaition and can't be used. The Disney Fan Club is not officially part of Disney. They explicitely state "This site is not a part of the main Disney Channel. This is just a Fan Site". You need a better reference for the information such as http://www.forbes.com/home/media/2008/04/09/entertainment-disney-lovato-biz-media-cx_lr_0409kidstars.html. Also this info better belongs in the career section of the article, not the lead paragraph. --NrDg 04:40, 13 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

PAKDA edit

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of PAKDA, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://dailylark.blogspot.com/2008/07/pakda-russian-stealth-bomber.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:41, 3 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of PAKDA edit

 

A tag has been placed on PAKDA requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later." You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. The Llama! (talk) 14:46, 3 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:AMXD.jpg edit

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as Image:AMXD.jpg has been listed for speedy deletion because you selected a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission. While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case[1][2]. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because images on Wikipedia need to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License or another free license, which allow anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-3.0}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file, please understand that the vast majority of images found on the internet are not appropriate for Wikipedia. Most content on the internet is copyrighted and the creator of the image has exclusive rights to use it. Wikipedia respects the copyrights of others - do not upload images that violate others' copyrights. In certain limited cases, we may be able to use an image under a claim of fair use - if you are certain that fair use would apply here, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list. If no fair use rationale applies, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If you have any questions please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 14:38, 7 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

An exciting oportunity to get involved! edit

 

As a member of the Aviation WikiProject or one of its subprojects, you may be interested in testing your skills in the Aviation Contest! I created this contest, not to pit editor against editor, but to promote article improvement and project participation and camraderie. Hopefully you will agree with its usefulness. Sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here. The first round of the contest may not start until September 1st-unless a large number of editors signup and are ready to compete immediately! Since this contest is just beginning, please give feedback here, or let me know what you think on my talkpage. - Trevor MacInnis contribs 22:56, 26 August 2009 (UTC)Reply