Billybob2002

Welcome to the talk page of user, "Billybob2002."

Discussion

2013

Images needed.

If anybody has a free image of Dave Barnes, please put it on the Dave Barnes article on the info box, thanks! - Billybob2002 (talk) 02:15, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

You mean this guy? --Nat Gertler (talk) 02:41, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Yes.- Billybob2002 (talk) 03:10, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

Recent edits concerning deism tags.

Hello, I'm NathanWubs. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions because it didn't appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! —Preceding undated comment added 10:21, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Images

Please take a look at the Manual of Style for images, Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Images, particularly WP:IMGSIZE. GDallimore (Talk) 11:00, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

April 2013

Hello, I'm Pass a Method. I noticed that you made a change to an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Pass a Method talk 12:03, 28 April 2013 (UTC)

• Re Luke 9:23 - the full text of Bible verses and other original texts are more appropriate for Wikisource, not here. NawlinWiki (talk) 02:49, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced content, templates or other materials from Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. Pass a Method talk 09:09, 29 April 2013 (UTC)

What disruptive editing? - Billybob2002 (talk) 02:44, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

A full 75% of your edits are disruptive or useless. People have been trying to guide you to relevant policies since you started editing, but you just blanked all their advice from your talk page, and now you have nothing but warnings on your talk page. Start behaving intelligently, or you will find yourself blocked. GDallimore (Talk) 09:47, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

So that is a compliment, because 25% of them are good! :) Anyways, my above question was asking what article(s) in particular was disruptive. - Billybob2002 (talk) 03:09, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Old Earth Creationism

Re this edit which was reverted, may I suggest that you work on the section Criticism. The section needs some expanding, especially references for the criticisms.Sjö (talk) 12:13, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of List of former Presidential Candidates

Hello Billybob2002,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged List of former Presidential Candidates for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, [[:{{{article}}}]].

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, fix Barney the barney barney (talk) 22:11, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Please check whether articles exist before you create duplicates of them. Otherwise you just waste your time and others. In this case you duplicated List of United States presidential candidates, and it wasn't even very complete. Please also remember that other republics exits outside of the United States which have presidents, and other organisations even have presidents, and as such it's always "United States presidential candidates" rather than "presidential candidates". Barney the barney barney (talk) 08:39, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

Moot

In US English, moot in a legal context roughly means stale, or no longer relevant. diff __ Just plain Bill (talk) 00:09, 6 May 2013 (UTC)

"Debatable" and "moot" have different connotations, and are not interchangeable. Rather than continuing with an edit war, please discuss your reasons for this change at Talk:Efforts to impeach George W. Bush. Thank you, __ Just plain Bill (talk) 13:35, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

May 2013

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Adam. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. The cited ref is very explicit. You can also read the linked target page (and various related talkpages) to find extensive consensus on use of the term "creation myth". You'll need an explicit and consensus reason to change that. DMacks (talk) 03:45, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

Bill White

And if you'd look at the history of the Senate election article you'd see that I found the source to list him as a potential candidate. So I am aware he has not announced he's running, and so would you be if you'd look at the Senate election article or the source used on the page. Ratemonth (talk) 02:54, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Yes, I did not realize at the time that he was listed as potential. -- Billybob2002 (talk) 02:58, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Picture of Tom Emmer.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Picture of Tom Emmer.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. (ESkog)^(Talk) 06:11, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Scott Honour for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Scott Honour is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Scott Honour until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Stuartyeates (talk) 21:07, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 21

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Wayzata, Minnesota, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Republican (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 21 June 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Party leaders of the United States Senate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Independent Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:50, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

Replaceable fair use File:Scott Honour.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Scott Honour.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that this media item is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails the first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media item could be found or created that provides substantially the same information or which could be adequately covered with text alone. If you believe this media item is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
2. On the file discussion page, write the reason why this media item is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 11:53, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Frank Addivinola for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Frank Addivinola is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Frank Addivinola until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Designate (talk) 01:33, 19 July 2013 (UTC)

Jeff Johnson (Minnesota politician)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, and under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribute Share-Alike."

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question at the "Help Desk". You can also leave a message on my talk page. Jonathunder (talk) 23:01, 27 July 2013 (UTC)

Copyright concerns

As you've seen from previous discussion, we don't include copyright-violating items in the text. Relevant to your recent edits at David Barton, we also don't link to copyright-violating items, per WP:LINKVIO. In the case of YouTube, that means that we can generally link to something from an official account (if Beck's show itself had posted the video), but we don't link to it if others posted it... whether that is fans or detractors. --Nat Gertler (talk) 17:30, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited United States House of Representatives elections in Minnesota, 2014, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Pederson (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Links to pages

Hey, I noticed you put links to candidate pages that don't exist. There is no reason to have red links on a page, so from now on please check to make sure someone has a page before adding the [[ ]] around their names. Rxguy (talk) 16:48, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

While Rxguy may be against redlinks, Wikipedia guidelines actually encourage redlinks within resaonable guidelines, as it has been found to encouraged growth in the encyclopedia. --Nat Gertler (talk) 17:30, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

To clarify: Candidates such as Gurley L. Martin, John Kemper, Greg Leichty, Ed Marksberry, Bennie J. Smith in the Kentucky Senate race are not what the Wikipedia guidelines that NatGertler mentioned refer to. They are unknown candidates with nothing significantly notable other than the fact that they are extreme long-shots as candidates. These are people that really have no reasonable shot at having a Wikipedia page, for good reasons, and would likely remain on the page for eternity as broken links. Rxguy (talk) 18:34, 5 August 2013 (UTC)

Perhaps a few of them should have an article. -- Billybob2002 (talk) 02:32, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for August 7

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited United States House of Representatives elections in Minnesota, 2012, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brian Barnes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Kingdom's Dawn

The article Kingdom's Dawn has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no indication of notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DGG ( talk ) 00:43, 27 October 2013 (UTC) DGG ( talk ) 00:43, 27 October 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for November 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited The Encounter (2010 film), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages William Waters and Marc Davies (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:09, 9 November 2013 (UTC)

2014

Disambiguation link notification for January 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of 2014 albums, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ready to Fly (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

May 2014

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Ken Ham. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Your addition of the word 'allegedly' was a clear violation of our NPOV policy, as was removal of the critical external links at Answers in Genesis Dougweller (talk) 05:32, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Is there a rule against putting 'allegedly' on the articles? -- Billybob2002 (talk) 05:37, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Yep, it's called WP:ALLEGED. Your placed it there to cast doubt on scientific consensus. Dougweller (talk) 06:40, 20 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marvel Studios, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Elektra and Ghost Rider (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:48, 27 June 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of Avatar: The Last Airbender characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page James Garrett. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

2015

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:01, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Billybob2002. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Billybob2002. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

WP:NPOL

Out of curiosity, have you ever even read the above guideline? John from Idegon (talk) 04:26, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

Yes. The part of the requirement which states a politician with a significant level of press coverage might qualify John James' article for notability, as he has been featured on Fox News. I think the article should use less sources from his campaign website though. Billybob2002 (talk) 18:51, 9 May 2018 (UTC)

Procedural notice

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

Please be mindful of editing restrictions on some political articles, such as not repeating an edit that has been challenged. Use the talk page to obtain consensus first. — JFG ^talk 05:44, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:NA Ranger's Apprentice logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:NA Ranger's Apprentice logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:43, 23 July 2018 (UTC)

Nomination of Pete Stauber for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pete Stauber is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pete Stauber until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Marquardtika (talk) 21:58, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

• Hi. I see that you are new to article creation and to the AfD process. Try not to get discouraged. It takes a while to learn the ropes, and, as you have discovered the hard way, pages on candidates for House seats are very rarely kept - a policy that exists for excellent reasons. They can, however, be kept when a candidate is drawing an extraordinarily attention (the kind of coverage Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez has gotten,) or when s/he has domes something earlier in life that is sufficiently notable to support an article with WP:SIGCOV, even though no one had created such an article before the campaign. It is not especially useful to iVote to "keep" articles at AfD. What can keep articles at AfD is hard work of by editors willing to build the article with reliable sources that actually meet the requirements of WP:SIGCOV. If you've got the sources, you usually carry the day. Cheers.E.M.Gregory (talk) 15:53, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Billybob2002. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

A cheeseburger for you!

Thanks for adding all the "blue background" portraits for the Representatives that were still missing official portraits! First time everyone's had a picture in a while, right? You've performed a civic duty to say the least. Westroopnerd (talk) 22:52, 10 February 2019 (UTC)

Thank you. Billybob2002 (talk) 21:22, 12 February 2019 (UTC)

Bypassing redirects

Hi, I noticed in your edits to college lists that some of your changes to wikilinks have no apparent reason other than to bypass a redirect. Please note that per WP:NOTBROKEN, those changes are generally not recommended and they can be counter-productive. For example, you removed links to Gorham State College and Northern Conservatory of Music, which should probably be expanded into articles someday, and replaced them with links to the physical facilities where those schools were housed, which will be less-than-useful once those articles exist. Toohool (talk) 20:05, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Discretionary sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 19:47, 13 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Chad Christensen (Nevada politician)

The article Chad Christensen (Nevada politician) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. -- φ OnePt618^Talk φ 07:30, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Carl (name), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Carlton and Carl of Sweden (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:13, 5 April 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:33, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for December 10

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Janet Petersen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Beaverdale, Iowa.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 10 December 2020 (UTC)

My Apologies re: Ted Wheeler!

Reverted your reverts somehow while logged on when I meant to revert the vandalism. I guess that's what I get for trying to edit on mobile. WeepyClementine (talk) 00:54, 20 March 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:25, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Nomination of Mike McFadden for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mike McFadden is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mike McFadden until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

– Muboshgu (talk) 17:19, 27 March 2024 (UTC)

Flying (Cody Fry album) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Flying (Cody Fry album). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Broc (talk) 12:15, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

So Apple Music and Discogs are not good third party sources, is that what you are saying? The "I Hear a Symphony" was a viral TikTok song. That should be an additional factor that makes it notable. Billybob2002 (talk) 22:38, 3 April 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Flying (Cody Fry album) has been accepted

Flying (Cody Fry album), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

LJF2019 ^talk 03:15, 5 April 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of Flying (Cody Fry album) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Flying (Cody Fry album) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Flying (Cody Fry album) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Broc (talk) 09:57, 10 April 2024 (UTC)

April 2024

Hi Billybob2002! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Quite a few of your recent minor edits are actually substantial removals or additions of content. Somewhat unrelated, but please consider moving Who Knew It Would Be So Hard To Be Myself into the draft space or into a userpage until you have multiple reliable sources that establish the subject's notability. As it stands now, an Apple Music link is insufficient. ~ Pbritti (talk) 00:41, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Who Knew It Would Be So Hard To Be Myself moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Who Knew It Would Be So Hard To Be Myself. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability and sources linked do not show to fulfill WP:NALBUM requirements. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Broc (talk) 11:26, 18 April 2024 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Dave Barnes – Who Knew It Would Be So Hard To Be Myself.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Dave Barnes – Who Knew It Would Be So Hard To Be Myself.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Johnj1995 (talk) 03:55, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Who Knew It Would Be So Hard To Be Myself (April 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TheChineseGroundnut was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Who Knew It Would Be So Hard To Be Myself and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

@T.C.G. [talk] 16:00, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Billybob2002! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! @T.C.G. [talk] 16:00, 19 April 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Who Knew It Would Be So Hard To Be Myself (April 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Who Knew It Would Be So Hard To Be Myself and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 06:37, 23 April 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Who Knew It Would Be So Hard To Be Myself (April 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Who Knew It Would Be So Hard To Be Myself and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 03:05, 25 April 2024 (UTC)