Frot edit

Hello, you seem to be pretty new at Wikipedia. The community frowns upon blanking or removing content from article talk pages. When a page gets long enough it gets archived. Regards, Durova 07:08, 14 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Your websites... edit

I've always wanted to know this, but never did get an answer on the websites themselves, for obvious reasons - why do you consider anal sex so morally wrong, and why do you stymie all discussion of it on those websites instead of inane frot worship? Why can you not advocate equality in choices of sexual acts? How can you rage at the cultural 'tyranny' of anal sex, when you advocate oppressing it? -Kez 02:11, 19 December 2006 (UTC)Reply

If you took the time to read the sites (which would take time and effort) it's quite clear why Weintraub thinks anal sex is wrong. 1)That it harms the human body 2) That it emasculates 3) That it mimics heterosexuality 4) (Biblical) that it's morally wrong because it harms one or both partners. Also, as you've shown, there is a 'tyranny' of anal sex. It's become the Golden Calf of the Mainstream Gay Subculture. If you don't think so, then go to a gay forum and say something negative about anal sex, and then you'll see.132.241.72.216 (talk) 00:05, 5 November 2008 (UTC)Theodore from CaliforniaReply