August 2023 edit

  Hello, I'm WikiLinuz. I noticed that you removed topically relevant content from Lingam. However, Wikipedia is not censored. Please do not remove or censor information that directly relates to the subject of the article. If the content in question involves images, you have the option to configure Wikipedia to hide images that you may find offensive. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. --WikiLinuz {talk} 21:10, 30 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

I know wiki is not censored, I am not removed it completely the information related to different types of lingam is mentioned in subsection, there is no need to mention this type and that type in lead section, "Lingam iconography found at archaeological sites of the Indian subcontinent and southeast Asia." Is enough in lead, because there is so many types of lingams if we started to add everything it will become non sense. I am also not removed reference I just relocated it to subsection . Bhadra 782 (talk) 03:04, 31 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lingam. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --WikiLinuz {talk} 04:48, 31 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

September 2023 edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Lingayatism, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan - Let's talk! 15:40, 3 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

I request you to please read references, if you found mentioned content on references, then warn me if you didn't find , then undo your revert. Bhadra 782 (talk) 16:32, 3 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Your edit to Siddhanta Shikhamani has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Skyerise (talk) 17:16, 4 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Godachi Shree Bhadrakali Veerabhadreshwara Temple has been accepted edit

 
Godachi Shree Bhadrakali Veerabhadreshwara Temple, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Stuartyeates (talk) 06:24, 5 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Template:Infobox Lingayatism edit

The template has too much information for an infobox. Most of it should be covered in text form in the article. Suggest standard infobox. Redtigerxyz Talk 06:48, 25 December 2023 (UTC)Reply