Beth4664
141 edit
Beth, 141 has lord only knows what reasons for posting this stuff. I have looked at other articles he/she has contributed to, and it paints an interesting picture. Regardless, you may find it useful to consider 141 to be trolling, although we certainly don't want to say that on the talk page. He/she will go to no end to tangle you up with endless "information" from "authoritative" sources. I know you didn't ask, but my advice to you is to not be sucked in. Your time will be wasted, I am certain of it. Please consider my earlier comments about joining the more responsible editors such as Rikstar, and respond only to edits in the article. We've covered all of this repeatedly. You can find it all in the archived discussions, but it's a waste of time.Steve Pastor (talk) 00:27, 25 July 2009 (UTC) However, we are all free to edit, or reverse edits that we disagree with. After reading so many complaints, I decided to get the ball rolling. I don't think you have to win a debate with someone over every edit when there are other editors who share your view. Steve Pastor (talk) 15:15, 30 July 2009 (UTC)