BecauseofThem

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Controversial Laws in Iran (October 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Tol was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Controversial Laws in Iran and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Tol (talk | contribs) @ 14:56, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

Hello, BecauseofThem! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Tol (talk | contribs) @ 14:56, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

@Tol Thanks for reviewing the articles. I have listed 3 reasons for creating this page. What do you suggest?

1. The laws are not necessarily related to Women's rights in Iran, Religion in Iran or Human rights. For example laws related to
   1. Dogs
   2. Pets
   3. International Sports Competition
   4. International Travels
2. I anticipate listing these laws under articles or sections related to religion, sharia or Islam to make a controversial discussion and repeated edits about Islamophobia. That is why creating a new article with natural view point seems necessary.
3. There are other pages on Wikipedia with similar theme, and specificity in subject. For example
   1. Strange laws
   2. Unusual laws
   3. Unusual eBay listings
   4. Unusually shaped fruits and vegetables
   5. Controversial Reddit communities
   6. List of controversial album art
   7. Unusual types of gramophone records
   8. Unnecessary health care
   9. Alcohol laws in Germany
   10. Gun laws in Ohio
   11. Prohibitions in Sikhism
   12. Rabbinically prohibited activities of Shabbat

BecauseofThem (talk) 16:59, 23 October 2022 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:Controversial laws in Iran has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Controversial laws in Iran. Thanks! CNMall41 (talk) 19:22, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Controversial laws in Iran (November 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Controversial laws in Iran and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 20:08, 1 November 2022 (UTC)

@Fiddle^Timtrent [[User talk:Timtrent|

What do you define controversial? "giving rise or likely to give rise to public disagreement." If one nationwide protest doesn't make laws controversial then what it does?