Baseplate RBLX
Welcome edit
|
Important Notice edit
This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
Doug Weller talk 12:58, 14 October 2020 (UTC)
October 2020 edit
Please refrain from making abusive or otherwise inappropriate edit summaries, as you did to Nice. Your edit summary may have been removed. Please look at pages regarding Civility and Personal attacks in your spare time. Thank you. Love of Corey (talk) 21:52, 29 October 2020 (UTC)
- My message wasn't attacking anyone. What I meant by what I said was that this "You don't agree with me so I have to attack you!" stuff going around is stupid and needs to stop. I didn't make an attack on anyone. Baseplate RBLX (User talk:Baseplate RBLX)
11:32 October 31st 2020 (PST)
- Please stop leaving ridiculous edit summaries like this one. It's just an edit summary explaining your edit; no one cares about your opinions. Also, what you changed was--literally--the title of a newspaper article! That would be the same as editing an article about the book War and Peace, and changing it to War and Dislike. Please pay attention when you edit Wikipedia. Thanks! Magnolia677 (talk) 18:47, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
December 2020 edit
Please do not add or change content, as you did at 2nd Ranger Battalion, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:37, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
- Sorry, I forgot to add the sources, I'll do it as soon as I can. The World War Two section of it is missing a lot of important events that the Battalion became known for and I wish to include it because there is so much more that people need to hear, not just the vague details from Pointe Du Hoc, there's a lot of important information missing about the battle that makes it seem rather minor compared to what had happened. (Talk) 6:55, 5th December, 2020 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at 2nd Ranger Battalion, you may be blocked from editing. Magnolia677 (talk) 19:00, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
- I will sources them when I get a chance. (Talk) 1909, 5 December, 2020 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:2020 United States presidential election, you may be blocked from editing. Acroterion (talk) 19:13, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
- Damn, it feels like the Democrats are coming out for me today. There was a whole discussion on that same talk about different views and beliefs can be expressed on it as long as it doesn't become toxic. (Talk) 19016, 5 December, 2020 (UTC)
- Your conspiracy theories are toxic, and so is your claim that "Democrats are coming out for me today". If you don't follow Wikipedia policies like WP:RS and WP:NOTFORUM, you will be reverted, warned, and if you continue, blocked. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:18, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
- None of these are conspiracy theories. And my claim that "Democrats are coming our for me today" is a joke on how I keep being censored by people. (Talk) 1920, 5 December, 2020 (UTC)
- You're not being censored. Your posts that don't adhere to WP:NOTFORUM are being removed as per the guideline. And everything you say about "Democrats controlling the media" is a conspiracy theory. Please stop doing that. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:24, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
- Wikipedia isn't a free-speech forum for the promotion of conspiracy theories, or for speculation about the motivations of other editors, who are following the encyclopedia's policies. Acroterion (talk) 19:31, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
- I'm not spreading conspiracy theories. There is evidence supporting that there was voter fraud. ([[User Talk:Baseplate RBLX|Talk) 1943, 5 December, 2020 (UTC)
- None of these are conspiracy theories. And my claim that "Democrats are coming our for me today" is a joke on how I keep being censored by people. (Talk) 1920, 5 December, 2020 (UTC)
- Your conspiracy theories are toxic, and so is your claim that "Democrats are coming out for me today". If you don't follow Wikipedia policies like WP:RS and WP:NOTFORUM, you will be reverted, warned, and if you continue, blocked. – Muboshgu (talk) 19:18, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at 2nd Ranger Battalion. Magnolia677 (talk) 19:25, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
- Muboshgu, damn dude, give me a bit of time, I'll get the sources as soon as I can. (Talk) 1932, 5 December, 2020 (UTC)
- Get source, then edit, not the other way around - otherwise, you're just editing an encyclopedia from memory. We go by the sources, not the recollections of individual editors. Acroterion (talk) 19:34, 5 December 2020 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. ST47 (talk) 07:13, 7 December 2020 (UTC)