Barmsbarms

Hello. You have a new message at ErikHaugen's talk page. Why have you deleted our article Psychology in Russia: State of the Art? I represent the publisher of this journal and we oun all the content from our official website to which you are referring to. You should have asked this first. Please revert the deletion. If you need any proof, tell me what to send you

Read everything on this page. It contains the answers you seek, and also asks you to stop doing what you are doing. "You should have asked this first"—No. No, I shouldn't have. ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 17:20, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

Hello. You have a new message at ErikHaugen's talk page. Thank you for the information on conflict of interest. If you read the article you will see that all the information is factual and bears no signs of advertising and of someone's biased opinion. Yes, I happen to be affiliated with the publishers, that is how I know precise facts about the jounal. The rule of conflict of interests exists to insure the objectivity of the article's content. If you look into the content closely you will see that the information there is factual - editors, circulation, aims and scopes. How can you forbid people from writing articles on something they work so hard, like this journal of ours? We cannot wait until some complete stranger writes something about our journal. Is this what this rule implies? If this content violates no copyright, and is an information from the first hands per se, what is the problem? I ask you to advise me on the necessary changes, if such are needed, and restore the article.

Barms, the {{Whisperback}}s aren't for what you're using them for, you don't need them here. We cannot wait until some complete stranger writes something about our journal.—Yes you can, that would be best. "forbid", "rule"—Those aren't the right words, I don't think anyone said that to you, did they? That certainly isn't why I deleted the articles. The "necessary changes" about using copyrighted works are clearly outlined below; I'm not sure what else I can say—which part is unclear? Another necessary change would be references to significant coverage of the subject in reliable, third party sources; see Wikipedia:Verifiability. —ErikHaugen 2620:0:1000:3003:B6B5:2FFF:FEB8:147E (talk) 19:49, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Веракса, Николай Евгеньевич.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
• You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! MatthewVanitas (talk) 18:42, 23 October 2012 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Psychology in Russia: State of the Art

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Psychology in Russia: State of the Art requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. DGG ( talk ) 04:05, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

Conflict of Interest

Hello, Barmsbarms. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Creating Psychology in Russia: State of the Art, you may need to consider our guidance on conflicts of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

• Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
• Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
• Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
• Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 17:09, 19 December 2012 (UTC)