User talk:Bamyers99/Archive 22

Latest comment: 2 months ago by MediaWiki message delivery in topic The Signpost: 2 March 2024

Tech News: 2023-46

MediaWiki message delivery 23:50, 13 November 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 20 November 2023

Suggestion: Include off-topic/irrelevant-tagged articles

Category:All articles that may have off-topic sections captures articles tagged with {{Off topic}} and {{relevance inline}}. It may be useful if CleanupWorklistBot captured these too. I don't consider this a priority as it currently affects only 1,170 articles. Thank you for your consideration. Stefen Towers among the rest! GabGruntwerk 00:42, 15 November 2023 (UTC)

@StefenTower: It will show up in next weeks run. --Bamyers99 (talk) 16:24, 21 November 2023 (UTC)
Thank you very much! Stefen Towers among the rest! GabGruntwerk 18:39, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Tech News: 2023-47

MediaWiki message delivery 00:53, 21 November 2023 (UTC)

Template parameters tool

Hello, your tool bambots.brucemyers.com/TemplateParam.php, seems to not always include the number of occurrences for values of a given parameter. For example, if you look here at the Start date template, for the parameter "1" (among other parameters), it does not show the number of occurrences, whereas the parameter "7" does. Would it be possible to include the number of occurences for all parameters? I find this useful so that if there is an inherently out-of-place value, I can be ensure whether I successfully searched and found all of the occurences. TheGEICOgecko (talk) 09:34, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

@TheGEICOgecko: The program does not count occurrences when there are more than 50 unique values. --Bamyers99 (talk) 16:37, 24 November 2023 (UTC)

Tech News: 2023-48

MediaWiki message delivery 23:06, 27 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 4 December 2023

Tech News: 2023-49

MediaWiki message delivery 23:48, 4 December 2023 (UTC)

Tech News: 2023-50

MediaWiki message delivery 02:10, 12 December 2023 (UTC)

Tech News: 2023-51

MediaWiki message delivery 16:15, 18 December 2023 (UTC)

Cleaning listing stats on-wiki?

Hi again, I was just wondering if the stats at the top of the cleanup listing ("Of the ???? articles in this project ???? or ??% are marked for cleanup, with ???? issues in total.") are kept anywhere on the Wikipedia itself in a way that can be accessed to show on a WikiProject page. It would make it easier for project participants to see where the cleanup issues currently stand without having to load an external webpage. If it's not possible, that's OK - just curious. Stefen Towers among the rest! GabGruntwerk 19:39, 21 December 2023 (UTC)

@StefenTower: Here you go. Just insert the following code where you want the stats to appear. {{#section:User:DataflowBot/CleanupStats|Louisville}} --Bamyers99 (talk) 00:36, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
Wow, thanks! I wrote some additional code to extract the number I primarily want to show, and it works great. I assume this will be generated with the weekly cleanup list run? Stefen Towers among the rest! GabGruntwerk 02:01, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
@StefenTower: That is the plan. This was a manual run to test it. Have to wait and see if the automated run works. --Bamyers99 (talk) 02:12, 22 December 2023 (UTC)
Cool. Thanks again! Stefen Towers among the rest! GabGruntwerk 02:20, 22 December 2023 (UTC)

The Signpost: 24 December 2023

CS1 error on List of websites founded before 1995

  Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page List of websites founded before 1995, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

  • A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 01:38, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-02

MediaWiki message delivery 01:17, 9 January 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 January 2024

Tech News: 2024-03

MediaWiki message delivery 00:11, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Importance, Class missing in CleanupWorklistBot results, Part 2

OK, I've poked around a bit, and after finally finding the right place to ask, found out that WP United States uses the WikiProject banner module and inserts data into PageAssessments (WP Louisville example). Might there possibly be something in the CleanupWorklistBot code that isn't getting at this data, perhaps related to WP Louisville being a subproject? Stefen Towers among the rest! GabGruntwerk 02:51, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

@StefenTower: Yeah, it's the United States/WikiProject in front of Louisville. I have enhanced the code to be able to specify an override in the master project file. --Bamyers99 (talk) 19:29, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
Wow, thanks again! I'll do this for WP Kentucky too. Your consistent barnstar-earning help is greatly appreciated. Stefen Towers among the rest! GabGruntwerk 19:39, 5 January 2024 (UTC)
After two runs, this is working great. Thanks again. I just noticed one nit that I don't personally need corrected, but someone else possibly might. The results aren't showing importance/class under the "Resolved articles" section. Definitely no rush needed on this, as far as I'm concerned - for me, if an article is resolved, it is effectively no longer part of the fix process in the project anyway. Stefen Towers among the rest! GabGruntwerk 19:49, 16 January 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-04

MediaWiki message delivery 01:01, 23 January 2024 (UTC)

Vital articles

Hi there, the cleanup listing for Vital articles was last updated 18 days ago, but i thought it updated weekly please? Tom B (talk) 13:19, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

@Tpbradbury: The project article category structure was changed. I have updated to the bot to use the new category structure. --Bamyers99 (talk) 14:23, 27 January 2024 (UTC)
thanks! Tom B (talk) 14:39, 27 January 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-05

MediaWiki message delivery 19:29, 29 January 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 January 2024

Tech News: 2024-06

MediaWiki message delivery 19:20, 5 February 2024 (UTC)

Help

Kindly help me fixing and managing User:AlexNewArtBot/SufismSearchResultQuadriSyedSahab(T · C 17:52, 11 February 2024 (UTC)

@QuadriSyedSahab: It is working. --Bamyers99 (talk) 13:56, 12 February 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 13 February 2024

Tech News: 2024-07

MediaWiki message delivery 05:46, 13 February 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-08

MediaWiki message delivery 15:34, 19 February 2024 (UTC)

Adding comments to Inception bot rules

Hi, Bamyers99,

I am planning a new feed for Inception bot, and I would like to comment all of the rules. I searched the bot doc but the word comment doesn't appear. Can I just use <noinclude>...<</noinclude> or perhaps just add the Perl-style hash character (#) to signal beginning of a comment on that line? As a last resort, I could use <!-- Html comments --> which wouldn't be visible on the page, but at least they would in the wikicode, assuming the bot will skip those. If none of these work, can you modify the bot to accept comments in rules? Mathglot (talk) 18:56, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

@Mathglot: <!-- Html comments --> are ignored by the bot. --Bamyers99 (talk) 19:51, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Tech News: 2024-09

MediaWiki message delivery 19:21, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Regex flavor

Hello again. I have a question about the flavor of regex to be used in rules. The doc page mentions "Pattern that we should have is a Regular expression as in Perl", but then further down it says, "Note that \W (uppercase only) is needed to mark a word boundary." However, in Perl RE, \W marks a non-word character, and a word boundary is \b. So exactly what flavor of regex is being used by the bot? I am familiar with regexes and can write sophisticated expressions, but I need to know what variety of regex it is so I can do that. Maybe it really is Perl RE, and it's just the doc page that is wrong, because \b is a non-word char next to a word char, i.e., \b = zero-length lookahead /(?=(\w\W|\W\w))./ so that if everything else in the rule is a word character, then \W is kind of a weak word boundary marker, but it's imprecise and would fail if specials are involved. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 19:26, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

@Mathglot: The bot is written in PHP, so regex Escape sequences (php.net). The InceptionBot docs are wrong, I never corrected them after taking over the bot. --Bamyers99 (talk) 19:49, 26 February 2024 (UTC)
Thanks, I've updated the doc page. Mathglot (talk) 19:59, 26 February 2024 (UTC)

Untitled

Dear Bamyers99,
I have been using this site for many years and have noticed how the pages are very informative and descriptive, however I recently learned that the content on Wikipedia is user generated and has nothing to do with the corporation itself. Along with that I have noticed that there are strict policies about what you can post. Due to my ignorance I unintentionally vandalized a fellow user's page. I deeply apologize for doing so as I am a student and did not make the wisest decision. As a joke I made a page about my friends and I saw that I couldn't post it due to the numerous policies. I request you to tell me a way that I can post an official page on this joke without it being visible to the public. I tried sample pages but they(my other friends) say I can't get this approved. Please help me find a way to post it without a sample page. I leave the rest to you. Thank you for taking the time to read my plea.
Thank you Gallusgallustandivorus (talk) 10:20, 29 February 2024 (UTC)
(talk page watcher) Note: the post above is a duplicate of this comment. Gallus, best practices call for avoiding discussion fragmentation, which is to say, discuss in one place, and if you want, just provide a pointer from one location to another (e.g. "Please see the discussion at User talk:Gallusgallustandivorus#February 2024"). I will respond at your Talk page, not here. Mathglot (talk) 10:32, 29 February 2024 (UTC)

The Signpost: 2 March 2024