Welcome

edit
Hello Balistik94, and Welcome to Wikipedia! 

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page — I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.


Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

Need help?

How you can help:

Additional tips...

Balistik94, good luck, and have fun. --E4024 (talk) 21:11, 27 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Sept 2014

edit

  Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Tiger versus lion. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. The current content has been reviewed by multiple contributors who are either research scientists for years. While you have every rights to favor certain animals (I actually love lions more because I am a leo born), Wikipedia is not a place for expressing our love or personal biases on them. Also please note that Golden Prime you replied to has been indefinitely blocked by Wikipedia for committing the same offenses. Do not commit the same offenses he committed. Thank you. BigCat82 (talk) 18:50, 7 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, opinions and improperly sourced content, as you did at tiger versus lion, you may be blocked from editing. As explained to you many times, cherry picked statements and source synthesis are clear violations of Wikipedia rules. First a radio recording on youtube cannot be regarded as a reliable and verifiable source in Wikipedia. Second Dave favored tigers in Animal Face Off. Bert said the wrong animal (lions) were called the wrong king of beasts. If you want to quote their opinions you need to mention these as well to achieve a neutral point of view as per Wikipedia rule as they favored tigers too. But Wikipedia is not an undiscriminated collection of information and there are tons of clear expert opinions favoring tigers out there without the problems found in your sources too. Only a few representative clear standpoints are included as per Wikipedia rules. We can't just add expand the list by adding endlessly, especially with cherry picked expert opinions. Lastly you have no consensus among us to remove probably sourced information, for the reliably recorded lion killing tiger accidental fights the information clearly showed the lions were larger males while the victims were the smaller tigresses which were caught off guard. Such information was provided by the sources. Sexes, weight and conditions of the animals were added as long as the sources provide them. Seek consensus in the article talk page before forcing your edits. BigCat82 (talk) 03:43, 8 September 2014 (UTC)Reply