Sorry for not seeing what you were trying to tell me. I apologise. Regards, George Custer's Sabre (talk) 14:14, 8 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Muslim Association of Britain edit

Hi. I just undid your edit to this page. Please see the talk page for more information. Relentlessly (talk) 08:12, 18 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Again, please see the talk page. Relentlessly (talk) 18:32, 19 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

June 2015 edit

This is not vandalism. You disagree with the edit (rightly, in my view), but it is not vandalism. It is utterly inappropriate to use "rvv" as the edit summary and it is also inappropriate to use a vandalism warning template on the user's talk page. Please recognise that it is a content dispute, not vandalism, and engage in discussion. Thank you. Relentlessly (talk) 19:27, 13 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Notification edit

This message contains important information about an administrative situation on Wikipedia. It does not imply any misconduct regarding your own contributions to date.

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

In addition, as a result of a recent ruling, all IP editors, accounts with fewer than 500 edits, and accounts with less than 30 days tenure are prohibited from editing any page that could be reasonably construed as being related to the Arab-Israeli conflict. RolandR (talk) 20:09, 23 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Warning edit

If you keep up your behaviour - edit warring, failing to accept talk page consensus, misleading edit summaries, removing sourced content, failing to follow WP:NPOV and templating experienced editors with vandalism warnings when you disagree you are going to be heading to WP:ANI. You have been warned about this nearly a year ago. AusLondonder (talk) 21:46, 15 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

Throw all the allegations & threats at me you like, if you're going to censor information, I'm going to restore it and warn you for it.--Bali Makmur (talk) 21:51, 15 May 2016 (UTC)Reply