Badkittydemon

October 2017

Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, including your edits to Year, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Whether or not you are correct, Wikipedia is not the place where you report your original analysis. (For the record, you are wrong. Perhaps, when the Earth's orbit is more eccentric, a year would be considered the period between aphelia.) — Arthur Rubin (talk) 14:57, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is User:Badkittydemon appears to be a troll. Jc3s5h (talk) 16:09, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Alex Shih (talk) 16:23, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Badkittydemon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I'm still fighting a device that will not cooperate, getting agitated and leaving unfinished posts for several reasons and trying to continue with partial ability to see past double loaded text. Fighting autocorrect and text changed and removed by my device, but these are my faults. I will need a more reliable device. For the space I had I didn't wish to inundate the posting with the equivalent of 200 hard pages of references, citations, and diagrams with the accompanying mathematic chartings. Even now these autocorrect auto finish sentences. Apologies. I do have the relevant data but won't bother others with what threatens dedicated efforts for a duration of time that would be unquantifiable.Thank you. Badkittydemon (talk) 18:28, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

That doesn't remotely explain incomprehensible or nonsense edits like this, this, this. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 19:04, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Badkittydemon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

irritated at weirdnessesBadkittydemon (talk) 18:32, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Technical decline, since I fixed the one above. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:59, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Badkittydemon (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

nonsense=the source, PBS. The theorists Da Vinci, Einstein, and Galileo on Nova and the Mechanical Universe, mainly with Hawking's show The Universe and geometric algebraic algorithmic and 2 dimensional mathematics, with quantum movements coupled with 3 dimensional motions. From Archimedes and Pythagoras. How is their works considered nonsense if we have accepted them all soundly? Can you even see the movement or is it just a refusal to try? It makes our math in many avenues basically moot. Velocities and motions. I know but it fits all the effects we are able to perceive in uniquely the ways those scholars described. The sad truth is I noticed a large portion of the proofs plastered all over wikipedia after just today from several posts by numerous people. The ones who probably reported me have what appears vested interests in other theories I believe are NOR. Anyway it goes I hope you have room to at least look. Badkittydemon (talk) 20:23, 23 October 2017 (UTC) Thank you this is because of device againBadkittydemon (talk) 20:25, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Enough trolling. Talk page access revoked. Yamla (talk) 20:32, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Badkittydemon (talk) 20:25, 23 October 2017 (UTC)