B1kekid

Welcome!

Hello, B1kekid, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, like Trips for Kids International, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for page creation, and may soon be deleted (if it hasn't already).

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Rwiggum (^Talk/_Contrib) 16:57, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of Trips for Kids International

A tag has been placed on Trips for Kids International, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Rwiggum (^Talk/_Contrib) 16:57, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Re: Trips for Kids

Hi. Neither you nor your members can submit information about your organization here, as you have conflict of interest, and your previous article read like an advertisement. Wikipedia has a strict neutral point of view policy. Look at articles like BAE Systems for an example of neutral writing; it was was not written by employees, but by some random people who had heard of the company. Wikipedia also has strict referencing rules. Regards, –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 20:11, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

Well, you could prepare an article that conforms to said policies in your userspace (such as User:B1kekid/Article preparation), and another editor might post it if he/she sees fit. –Juliancolton ^{Tropical Cyclone} 20:49, 12 March 2009 (UTC)

I have just come across this after a trip and I have some sympathy for you. I note, as you say, that Trips for Kids Metro DC exists but it has major problems as the templates at the top indicate. Your article, I am afraid, did not meet our standards. It was blatant advertising and it reads as if you had copied stuff from the organisation's own material. You need to understand wikipedia better. I suggest you work on improving a few articles and getting to understand wikipedia. I then suggest you follow the advice above. A conflict of interest does not actually prevent you from writing about the organisation but you have to be extremely careful, which you were not. Another suggestion is that you rename Trips for Kids Metro DC to Trips for Kids and modify it slightly to reflect that it is about the whole organisation, not one chapter. Articles on individual chapters are not encouraged. You can then hope that others add to the article. --Bduke (Discussion) 20:14, 19 March 2009 (UTC)