User talk:Avb/Archive7

This is an archive of inactive discussions. Please do not edit it. If you wish to revitalize an old topic, please bring it up on the active talk page.

Archives 3 July 2006 27 June 2007 17 July 2007 8 November 2007 11 December 2007 15 January 2008 8 February 2008 10 April 2008

I am no longer editing here.

Goodbye then. Compwhiz II^(Talk)_(Contribs) 01:35, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

So long, and thanks for all the fish. Shot info (talk) 01:47, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

You'll be missed. Hope you'll think about returning some day. --Ronz (talk) 02:10, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Take a long Wiki break but do come back. If I can help let me know. I will miss you. --CrohnieGal^Talk 13:59, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

In case you are lurking, you have mail! :) --CrohnieGal^Talk 15:18, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

I'm back to help keep an eye on the fringe masquerading as mainstream, especially in unsourced BLP content. Cleaning up my watchlist now, but certainly won't remove any bios I've worked on in the past. But I won't be editing anywhere near as frequently as before. I think. Avb 11:39, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Good, I'm glad you are back even if it's for just little things. I missed you being around, welcome back. Don't forget, you've got email! --CrohnieGal^Talk 19:36, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, have read your note, will reply tonight. Avb 14:02, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

The question needs to be asked "How many roads must a man walk down?" :-) Shot info (talk) 23:23, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Walking down is easy, it's walking up that's the problem ;^) Good to have you back. --Ronz (talk) 03:53, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks, gal and guys. <epiphany mode on> Everyone please read this modern lesson by Barbwires. Those who like it, may want to read on to experience an epiphany at #4 in this rather older one. At any rate, we're the somewhat older folks around here, and we should have learned not to spit into the wind by now. <epiphany mode off> Avb 14:02, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Got your email, will try to respond today but not sure I'll get to it. I am backed up again on emails! Still, I'm glad you are back, things seem weird here in a lot of articles, sadly it seems the different groups are staunchly separated more so then I have ever seen since coming here. I thought that the Barrett articles were bad but I have to say the WP:Homeopathy is worse than the Barrett articles were at the worse. I am still trying to figure out what it is since the article doesn't really tell me the basics to understand what it is. It just tells me how things are supposedly made but most of the article doesn't make sense to me at all. I guess I am slow or something since there are many editors there arguing with each other about things that make no sense to me. Anyways, I'll be in touch soon. Welcome back, if you need me for anything at all just drop me an email and hit the priorty tag so I know it's important. Thanks, you will always be my friend, I'm so glad I met you, even if it's just an on line type of thing. Oh, and if you are looking for a pretty quite article go to [1] The editors that do pop in are polite and I have been trying to work the article so that people can understand what Crohn's really is, not just the very medical details of genes and so forth. The article was written by a very good editor and GI but the article itself is too medical to understand what Crohn's really is. I have some links on my sandbox that I want to read through and hopefully be able to put it into the article soon. My health has been so down lately that it's been to tedious for me to read through anything and absorb the information to be able to do a proper edit. I will fill you in when I email, I don't want to say to much more here, as I am sure you understand. Hope the family is well. --CrohnieGal^Talk 14:40, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

PSJ VS. Ronz

I just wanted you to know that I tried a while back when their arguments first started to get them to WP:AGF and to work together or ignore one another. I failed miserably. Peter St John was adamant about not having anything to do with Ronz and then things kept going up a level and then another to where it is now. Ronz was receptive to help but PSJ wants nothing to do with Ronz, just telling you this so you don't get frustrated or anything. The best they can do in my opinion is avoid responding to one another. PSJ has a scratch page that should bring you up to date on the history of the two of them. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:PeterStJohn/ScratchPad Good try though to try to defuse the situation. --CrohnieGal^Talk 13:15, 8 February 2008 (UTC)

A suggestion

Why don't you reformat your talk page. Right now it look strange to me! :) --CrohnieGal^Talk 13:17, 8 February 2008 (UTC)