October 2008 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Daniel MacPherson has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. II MusLiM HyBRiD II ZOMG BBQ 21:55, 31 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

  The recent edit you made to Daniel MacPherson constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. II MusLiM HyBRiD II ZOMG BBQ 21:56, 31 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Andrew G. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. JodyB talk 21:58, 31 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Sydney Harbour New Year's Eve Fireworks 2008–09 edit

 

I have nominated Sydney Harbour New Year's Eve Fireworks 2008–09, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sydney Harbour New Year's Eve Fireworks 2008–09. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. ViperSnake151 00:07, 1 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Template: Infobox criminal edit

Hi Aussieman, I liked the idea of adding the birth_name, but there are major downsides as well. I tried to resolve the biggest one - a code message in almost every criminal box throughout Wikipedia - but to no avail. Then rolled back your edit as well. Perhaps you can redo while resolving the issues it creates. The field would definitely improve if both existent and different from the subject name! Best regards, gidonb (talk) 20:44, 27 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Re: Template:Infobox Criminal NEW edit

I appreciate that you are interested in working on an infobox, but please don't implement the use of a new template you've created without first proposing such usage on the WikiProject connected with its use. There has been no discussion whatsoever at WT:CRIME regarding the infobox you inserted here nor any project consensus regarding adopting such for the project. Also, please note that flagicons aren't used in biographies to indicate nationality. The only thing at this point that WP:CRIME has requested, for endless futile months now, has been correction to project banners that do not properly use listas= parameters. Thank you. Wildhartlivie (talk) 09:04, 12 May 2009 (UTC)Reply

Moved to User:Aussieman92/Infobox Criminal NEW Rich Farmbrough, 17:38, 30 May 2009 (UTC).Reply

Templates for deletion nomination of Template:NRL New Zealand edit

 Template:NRL New Zealand has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 04:51, 23 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for speedy deletion of Template:Infobox Rugby League Four Nations edit

Hi, I've nominated Template:Infobox Rugby League Four Nations for deletion as it has been replaced by Template:Infobox rugby league international tournament and no articles now link to the nominated template. The reason I have done this is that we had a new template for each tournament and it wasn't necessary. LunarLander // talk // 13:26, 16 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Round by Round votes edit

Hi there, Back in 2007, before you were on wiki, the 2007 Brownlow Medal article was nominated for deletion and one of the main criticisms was the round by round listing of the votes. I know it takes a lot of work to wikify the tables, but I think that we should expand the other areas of the article, and remove the round by round voting - leave the lists to the newspapers/other sources. Cheers, The-Pope (talk) 11:25, 22 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

2009 GF article edit

Hey Aussieman92, great work on the 2009 GF page! Thanks.Edelmand (talk) 00:28, 26 September 2009 (UTC)Reply

Tom Harley edit

Hi there,

I noticed you edited the player infobox for the Tom Harley article. As per WikiProject AFL standards, please try to refrain from editing the infobox template that has been implemented into articles. The template has already been established and can be viewed at here. If you wish to update the statistics within the infobox, please make the edits accordingly through the template provided on the edit page. Regards, Boomtish (talk) 23:44, 22 October 2009 (UTC)Reply

Articles for deletion nomination of Brisbane Lions season 2010 edit

I have nominated Brisbane Lions season 2010, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brisbane Lions season 2010. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 08:36, 18 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Why no more Western? edit

G'day, just noticed that you moved the Western Force page to Force (Super rugby team). Why? Their webpage still has Western Force all over it. Newspaper stories still refer to them as that. By the WP:COMMONNAME policy, they should remain at Western Force. Was there any other reason? The-Pope (talk) 13:22, 23 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:AFL AUS edit

 Template:AFL AUS has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:46, 3 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

CfD nomination of Category:2009 AFL season edit

I have nominated Category:2009 AFL season (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for renaming to Category:2009 Australian Football League season (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. — ξxplicit 05:11, 4 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Discussion at WP:AFL edit

Hi Aussieman. We had a discussion here a couple of weeks ago regarding your new infobox. I apologise for not notifying then but would u be able to take a look at it please and maybe comment? A few of us aren't sure we should be including behinds and more specifically points in the infobox. Cheers. Jevansen (talk) 23:45, 4 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox A-League GF edit

 Template:Infobox A-League GF has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:00, 20 April 2010 (UTC)Reply

Anthem in AFLGameDetailed template edit

Hi Aussieman,

I noticed that you recently added the ability to include the singer of the national anthem in the detailed AFL scorecard. Is this something you have a strong opinion on including. I personally think that the singer is only a minor player in the whole day and doesn't warrant much more than a note at the bottom of the scorecard. Would you object if I removed it? or would you like to ask for other opinions at the AFL Project page?

Regards, Matt5AU (talk) 02:24, 18 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

You are now a Reviewer edit

 

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 04:57, 20 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

Just noticed your username, realise you might not be able to be much help. Cheers anyway, Mtaylor848 (talk) 20:55, 5 September 2010 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Brisbane Lions–Port Adelaide AFL rivalry for deletion edit

A discussion has begun about whether the article Brisbane Lions–Port Adelaide AFL rivalry, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brisbane Lions–Port Adelaide AFL rivalry until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. The-Pope (talk) 00:48, 10 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Sydney New Year's Eve telecast presenters edit

 

Category:Sydney New Year's Eve telecast presenters, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. The-Pope (talk) 11:59, 15 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Sydney New Year's Eve telecast hosts edit

 

Category:Sydney New Year's Eve telecast hosts, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. The-Pope (talk) 12:00, 15 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:AFLMatchSummaryLine edit

 Template:AFLMatchSummaryLine has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Mhiji (talk) 13:00, 12 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:NRL Grand Finals edit

 Template:NRL Grand Finals has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. EmanWilm (talk) 01:31, 9 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

 Template:North Queensland Fury FC squad has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Mattythewhite (talk) 00:07, 30 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Notification of automated file description generation edit

Your upload of File:Ashley McGrath (Round 4, 2009- Brisbane v Collingwood).jpg or contribution to its description is noted, and thanks (even if belatedly) for your contribution. In order to help make better use of the media, an attempt has been made by an automated process to identify and add certain information to the media's description page.

This notification is placed on your talk page because a bot has identified you either as the uploader of the file, or as a contributor to its metadata. It would be appreciated if you could carefully review the information the bot added. To opt out of these notifications, please follow the instructions here. Thanks! Message delivered by Theo's Little Bot (opt-out) 12:17, 6 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

 Template:Infobox Brownlow Medal ceremony has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 16:36, 19 February 2014 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:ALeague NQF edit

 Template:ALeague NQF has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Hhkohh (talk) 11:34, 25 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:ALeague GCU edit

 Template:ALeague GCU has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Hhkohh (talk) 11:36, 25 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox Sydney New Year's Eve edit

 Template:Infobox Sydney New Year's Eve has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Zackmann (Talk to me/What I been doing) 05:35, 26 January 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Sydney New Year's Eve 2008–09 for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sydney New Year's Eve 2008–09 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sydney New Year's Eve 2008–09 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ViperSnake151  Talk  16:25, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Infobox Sydney New Year's Eve edit

 Template:Infobox Sydney New Year's Eve has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. ViperSnake151  Talk  16:43, 7 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Sydney New Year's Eve edit

 Template:Sydney New Year's Eve has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. ♠PMC(talk) 03:17, 18 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Sydney New Year's Eve Hosts edit

 Template:Sydney New Year's Eve Hosts has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. AussieLegend () 12:43, 29 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

 

The file File:Daniel Giansiracusa (Brisbane Lions v Western Bulldogs - 2008).jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Poor quality file that is orphaned and would have no obvious value in transferring to Commons

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Salavat (talk) 07:59, 16 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Nomination for deletion of Template:Sydney NYE TV presenter line edit

 Template:Sydney NYE TV presenter line has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Frietjes (talk) 18:38, 15 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Category:Sydney New Year's Eve has been nominated for deletion edit

 

Category:Sydney New Year's Eve has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BaduFerreira (talk) 01:56, 17 April 2024 (UTC)Reply