Atulbahl1986

Welcome!

Hello, Atulbahl1986, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Atul bahl, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Dom from Paris (talk) 10:47, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Atul bahl

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Atul bahl, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
• It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dom from Paris (talk) 10:47, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

August 2019

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions; however, it appears you may have written a Wikipedia article about yourself, at Atul bahl. Creating an autobiography is strongly discouraged – please see our guideline on writing autobiographies. If you create such an article, it may be deleted. If what you have done in life is genuinely notable and can be verified according to our policy for articles about living people, someone else will probably create an article about you sooner or later (see Wikipedians with articles). If you wish to add to or change an existing article about yourself, you are welcome to propose the changes by visiting the article's talk page. Please understand that this is an encyclopedia and not a personal web space or social networking site. If your article has already been deleted, please see: Why was the page I created deleted?, and if you feel the deletion was an error, please discuss this with the deleting administrator. Thank you. Dom from Paris (talk) 10:48, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 12:32, 17 August 2019 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Atulbahl1986 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hi I am new here and was unaware about the rules I was merely trying to do good by providing communication solutions for autistic individuals for free I was geniunely not trying to advertise to make money once I was blocked from 1 account I created another account where I was making a draft which I thought would only be approved or disapproved and take 8 weeks for that to happen but another block came while I was editing I would humbly request you to unblock my account and I promise to refrain from repeating this Atulbahl1986 (talk) 06:47, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yunshui ^雲_水 07:07, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Atulbahl1986 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

As stated earlier I understand why I have been blocked I accept my mistake and will not cause damage or disruption and will make useful contributions instead. Kindly consider unblocking me and give me a second chance as I am a newbie and have a lot to learn :-) Atulbahl1986 (talk) 07:11, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

It's all well and good to say that, but experience tells us to believe otherwise. Please demonstrate your understanding by explaining in your own words why you got blocked, how your editing will change, how will you contribute constructively if unblocked and disabusing us of the notion that you will misuse Wikipedia for marketing purposes. In particular, why is writing about yourself discouraged on Wikipedia? MER-C 09:11, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Atulbahl1986 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hi I am new here and was unaware about the rules I was merely trying to do good by providing communication solutions for autistic individuals for free I was geniunely not trying to advertise to make money once I was blocked from 1 account I created another account where I was making a draft which I thought would only be approved or disapproved and take 8 weeks for that to happen but another block came while I was editing I would humbly request you to unblock my account and I promise to refrain from repeating this As stated earlier I understand why I have been blocked I accept my mistake and will not cause damage or disruption and will make useful contributions instead. Kindly consider unblocking me and give me a second chance as I am a newbie and have a lot to learn :-). I have repeatedly mentioned why I request to be unblocked and logically there is no way of demonstrating my intentions when I'm blocked and request a chance to prove I won't make the same mistakes in the future Atulbahl1986 (talk) 12:02, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

• Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
• Read our guide to improving articles
• Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
• If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas. Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:
  1. Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
  2. Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
     • do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this: {{infobox name|...}});
     • do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this: [[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]);
     • do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: [[Category:Name]]);
     • do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: {{Foo stub}});
  3. Click edit at your talk page, and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this: == [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet;
  4. Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution."
  5. You can now save the page. However, if your edits will include citations to reliable sources (which they should), add the following template to the end of your prose: {{reflist-talk}}. Once you have added the template, click Publish changes.
• Now, edit that content. Propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
• When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
  • If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{Help me|your question here ~~~~}}" to your talk page. Thank you. Yamla (talk) 12:07, 20 August 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Atulbahl1986 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I requested to be unblocked many times and have accepted my fault and apologised many times as well. What you've left me with to be unblocked is a set of complicated and confusing instructions. I made my mistake and request to be unblocked if I make another one ban me for life, its really that simple a request. I understand all of you are trying to have only constructive members as a part of this community but also understand that complicating the path to getting unblocked will also discourage new users from being prudent contributors.This is indeed my last request I will not put in any more requests. In case you feel I should not be unblocked I respect that and would like to thank you for letting me be a part of your community even though it was extremely short lived. Atulbahl1986 (talk) 19:56, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

The problem here is that you are either unwilling or unable to give any indication that you would be a constructive member of the community if unblocked. You repeatedly haven't given any indication of what kinds of contributions we could expect from you. If following detatiled step-by-step instructions is too difficult for you, then maybe Wikipedia is not the project for you. Huon (talk) 21:53, 25 August 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Atulbahl1986 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Huon, That is incorrect I have made changes to the https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pernia_Qureshi I was not logged in so I was able to make changes. Kindly have a look all changes made were to make sure that it is not a advertisement anymore and I removed tthe advertisement message when I was doneAtulbahl1986 (talk) 08:25, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Decline reason:

So instead of following the simple instructions provided to you, you instead decided to break even more rules by evading the block? Yunshui ^雲_水 08:02, 16 October 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If you mean this please keep WP:BE in mind. Victor Schmidt mobil (talk) 09:53, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

I have reverted those edits as the block is for you as a person and not just your user account. I will assume you didn't know that you were not allowed to do this or you wouldn't have so openly told us what you did. --Dom from Paris (talk) 12:46, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Atulbahl1986, are you explicitly rejecting the path toward unblocking that I offered you? On August 25th, you indicated that path was complicated and confusing, indicating that we shouldn't unblock you as you lack sufficient competence to be unblocked. But you didn't come right out and state this. Are you rejecting that path toward unblocking? --Yamla (talk) 13:13, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Hi Yamla, I think you're getting me wrong here. But yes I did find the set of instructions a bit complicated as I am currently extremely occupied with work as I'm sure all of you are or have been as well and I'd rather not go through with something I'm not confident about to further annoy you or any other admin. So I'm not rejecting your advice/instructions that's why I tried to edit an article when I was logged out. However, I chose a simpler path that would save a little time which was clearly not allowed and reversed. All I'm asking you guys is to go a little easy on me. As even though I've made mistakes I have nothing but respect for this forum and its adminsAtulbahl1986 (talk) 14:39, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

• Wikipedia is not a forum. Pinging Yamla. There was no ping in comment above mine. —usernamekiran(talk) 22:32, 26 August 2019 (UTC)

Leaving aside your continued block evasion, your edits to Pernia Qureshi were totally insufficient and generally made the article worse. Combined with your inability to follow the instructions above, I oppose lifting the block. --Yamla (talk) 22:44, 26 August 2019 (UTC)