User talk:AtlasDuane/Archive 1
|
AtlasDuane, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit
|
Hi AtlasDuane! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 13 May 2016 (UTC) |
Edit Help edit
 | This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can , contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse. |
I need some help with this article I'm trying to write in my sandbox. it would be appreciated if someone help write it.
- That would still need to focus with the best news and reviews available, and not simply interviews and simple mentions. SwisterTwister talk 22:06, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
- Wikipedia content should be a summary of what reliable third-party sources have reported about the subject. Your current sources are the band's own website and an interview, with the band speaking about itself, not independent coverage of the band. Google News results were rather scarce, but some of the Sveriges Radio pieces may help. Since I don't speak Swedish I haven't looked at those sources in detail, but since the total number of sources seems low, my advice would be to take a look at the notability guideline for bands, WP:MUSIC, and to check whether Dunderpatrullen meets those criteria at all. Huon (talk) 23:05, 19 October 2016 (UTC)
- Well, I know I have insufficient sources, Most of the sources from the original article are in Swedish, and I'm debating whether they would be fit. After your post, I'm also debating if they would fit on the English Wikipedia. AtlasDuane (talk) 18:24, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi! I saw that you added a citation needed note on the SOCKS proxy page. I wanted to add one, but I noticed that this is essentially described on the Tor page linked just before. Is that enough, or should I find a link to the Tor documentation describing this feature? If it's enough, do you know how I can properly add a reference (is that even desirable?) Namnatulco (talk) 08:20, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
- I'd say add a citation, personally, just to avoid someone deleting the points later along down the line, or to prevent a potential case of Citogenesis. I'd personally use {{cite-web}} to do it.AtlasDuane (talk) 19:42, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Do Animals Have Rights? edit
Do you want to have a short discussion first over it? I removed the template for now but will not contest deletion if there is additional support or discussion to delete.--NadirAli نادر علی (talk) 21:57, 25 April 2017 (UTC)
- Shall I put something up at WP:AFD? I feel like that's a good place to find consensus. AtlasDuane (talk) 09:57, 26 April 2017 (UTC)
- Your wish. An AFD should determine it. But if you do, don't forget to notify me. I will present an argument or so on the discussion page. Regards.--NadirAli نادر علی (talk) 17:39, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
- On second thoughts, I'll put a {{notability}} tag at the top of the page for a week, then I'll go to WP:AFD, if you don't mind. AtlasDuane (talk) 08:22, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
- Alright--NadirAli نادر علی (talk) 21:53, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages! edit
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by DES (talk) 13:59, 15 May 2017 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
Prometheus Rising problems edit
Regarding this, could you go to the article talkpage and illuminate specific problems that could be addressed? Thanks. - Bri (talk) 00:05, 28 June 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message edit
Hello, AtlasDuane. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Alt-right tags - please raise specifics on the talk page edit
I've removed them because you haven't then gone to the talk page with specifics. You only have 654 edits, how are you judging that this specific article is too long? What specific words are you calling weasel words? It certainly is not written like a personal essay - it's had 571 editors. I'd really like to know what makes you think it reads like a "personal reflection or opinion essay that states a Wikipedia editor's personal feelings about a topic" - can you explain that? I've seen a lot of articles that qualify, but definitely not this one. Over-quotation is something that definitely would have to be discussed on the talk page, some articles really need quotations.
As it stood, these were "badges of shame" but with no specifics that anyone could discuss and nothing to try to build a consensus around. See Wikipedia:Tag bombing and the linked articles for advice on tagging. Doug Weller talk 16:23, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
List of Supported Printers edit
Greetings fellow Wikipedian! I noticed that you removed the list of printers supported by Cura software. Since this is an opensource software, don't you think it's important to note the printers that are supported? I am not one to engage in edit wars, so instead of reverting, I thought I would reach out to you directly to inquire as to your thought process behind the edit. Not Wilkins (talk) 15:34, 9 April 2019 (UTC)Not Wilkins
- @Not Wilkins: I'm just trying to follow WP:LISTPURP & MOS:LISTFORMAT, a incredibly long list of supported 3D printers for a particular software, regardless of wherever it's FOSS or not, isn't really something people go to Wikipedia to find. One could simply find the relevant information with a simple internet search.
I'm writing to you because you created Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MooTools a while ago, which closed with "no consensus". I have just created Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MooTools (2nd nomination), so if you are interested pelase feel free to comment there. Anton.bersh (talk) 21:17, 26 April 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message edit
| | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |