Athenaathena07

Your submission at Articles for creation: User:Athenaathena07/sandbox (March 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at User:Athenaathena07/sandbox.
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the .

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

• Please remember to link to the submission!

• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Belshay (talk) 00:30, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Athenaathena07, you are invited on a Wikipedia Adventure!

The

Adventure

Hi Athenaathena07!! You're invited to play The Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive game to become a great contributor to Wikipedia. It's a fun interstellar journey--learn how to edit Wikipedia in about an hour. We hope to see you there! Play The Wikipedia Adventure This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:35, 15 March 2014 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

• The Wikipedia Adventure Start Page
• The Wikipedia Adventure Lounge
• The Teahouse new editor help space
• Wikipedia Help pages

-- 08:12, Wednesday, May 22, 2024 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Athenaathena07. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Arthur goes shopping (talk) 12:27, 17 March 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Athenaathena07. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 12:30, 17 March 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Disambiguation link notification for March 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jeffrey Lee Pierce, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cypress Grove (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Athenaathena07, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Getting started
• Introduction to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome!

As has been pointed out by the reviewer of your AFC submission in your sandbox, you need to look at referencing for beginners and reliable sources. --David Biddulph (talk) 13:49, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Athenaathena07. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 18:01, 19 March 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Your submission at Articles for creation: Cypress Grove (musician) (April 14)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Cypress Grove (musician).
• To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the .

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

• Please remember to link to the submission!

• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sionk (talk) 09:23, 14 April 2014 (UTC)

One of the suggestions which you received at the Teahouse a few weeks ago was to cure the bare urls in your draft, but I see that you have not yet done so. If a reviewer can see nothing other than a bare url, it is difficult for him to convince himself of the adequacy of the references to demonstrate the notability of the subject. If you supply further information, probably using templates like {{cite web}} or {{cite news}}, then it will be easier for the reviewer to assess the adequacy. --David Biddulph (talk) 12:05, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Thank you very much David, "per aspera sic itur ad astra". How would I cite the official Blondie web site though? Athenaathena07 (talk) 13:39, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Could I ask you to take a look at it now and tell me if there is any hope of having it published with the new variations you suggested? Thank you very much for your very helpful tips and suggestions. You are always very kind and patient with me. Athenaathena07 (talk) 23:07, 15 April 2014 (UTC)

Your submission at AfC a_talk:Articles_for_creation/Cypress_Grove_(musician)|Cypress Grove (musician)]] was accepted

Cypress Grove (musician), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

• If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
• If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Chris Troutman (talk) 18:34, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

I removed your questions from Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk but I'll answer them here. Wikipedia has several noticeboards, each for specific issues. AfC only handles articles waiting to be accepted.

For help improving Cypress Grove (musician), I recommend engaging with WP:WikiProject Musicians. The parent project, WP:WikiProject Biography might also help. Either of those WikiProjects might upgrade the article to B-class. When you feel ready, you may nominate the article for good article status. Be sure to review the criteria and instructions before nominating. Chris Troutman (talk) 23:51, 26 April 2014 (UTC)

Dear Chris, I made various corrections to the cypress grove page and would now like to nominate it for good article. How do I do it? Thank you Athenaathena07 (talk) 23:59, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

You're lucky I'm still watching your user talk page. In the future, if you want to contact me do so on my talk page.

To nominate your article for GA status, see these instructions. After you nominate the article it may be weeks or months before a reviewer sees it. They will evaluate the article based on the criteria and typically provide an opportunity for you to fix shortfalls before they render a decision. Chris Troutman (talk) 02:59, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cypress Grove (musician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bass (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:49, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Cypress Grove (musician) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Producer

Lydia Lunch (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Cypress Grove

T.B. Sheets (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)

added a link pointing to Cypress Grove

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:50, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Cypress Grove (musician)

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Cypress Grove (musician) you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 3family6 -- 3family6 (talk) 16:04, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Cypress Grove (musician)

The article Cypress Grove (musician) you nominated as a good article has failed ; see Talk:Cypress Grove (musician) for reasons why the nomination failed. If or when these points have been taken care of, you may apply for a new nomination of the article. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of 3family6 -- 3family6 (talk) 19:23, 3 November 2014 (UTC)

July 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Tuscany. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose editing privileges. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Alex2006 (talk) 12:37, 28 July 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of ICAC - International Confederation of Art Critics

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on ICAC - International Confederation of Art Critics requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. David Biddulph (talk) 17:14, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

You have been working on this draft in your sandbox. It would have been much more sensible to submit it from there for review through the AFC process rather than moving it yourself to mainspace when it obviously wasn't ready. - David Biddulph (talk) 17:17, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

I'm terribly sorry. I thought it was weird as I hadn't gone through this procedure before and it had been a long time since I submitted my last page and had forgotten how to do it. So I looked up the procedure and it said to do it that way. I'm sorry again and I agree that the article isn't finished yet and has to be completed. So sorry again I will work on it more and submit it normally after that. Thank you Athenaathena07 (talk) 17:38, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

I pasted it back into my sandbox for further work on it. How do I take it down from the mainspace though? Thank you Athenaathena07 (talk) 18:09, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

I've moved it to User:Athenaathena07/ICAC - International Confederation of Art Critics so that you can work on it there until it's ready. I've removed the speedy deletion tag, and added a userspace draft which includes a submit button for you to use when you think it's ready for review. - David Biddulph (talk) 18:59, 13 November 2015 (UTC)

Thank you very much Athenaathena07 (talk) 00:43, 14 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Athenaathena07. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Athenaathena07. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Athenaathena07. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Athenaathena07. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Athenaathena07

Thank you for creating Lucania (film).

User:Doomsdayer520, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thank you for this new article, though I recommend enhancing the text with professional reviews and other types of media notice. See WP:EXIST and WP:NFILM.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Doomsdayer520}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

---DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 15:28, 15 October 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:17, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Athenaathena07! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Verifiable information, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to . The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:03, 12 August 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 12

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Suzie Stapleton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cypress Grove. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:09, 12 March 2021 (UTC)

Together Price

Hello, I'm Deb. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you.Deb (talk) 08:26, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

Hello Deb, thank you so much for your intervention. It helped me get a better perspective on the matter. Could I disturb you further for some advice on how to write this page without bias and from a neutral perspective? Any advice will be gladly received. ~~~~Athenaathena07 Athenaathena07 (talk) 09:14, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

I have to ask first: do you have an undeclared conflict of interest? Deb (talk) 12:07, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

Yes, I think I do. So maybe I shouldn't be writing it. What do you advise me to do? ~~~~Athenaathena07 Athenaathena07 (talk) 13:00, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

Now you've read the guideline, which advises against it - so you shouldn't do it. You can make a request for an article to be created at Wikipedia:Requested articles, but there's no guarantee it will happen. Deb (talk) 13:13, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

Ok, but what if I gave it a shot with an un biased approach as a draft and then submitted it to you to check before publishing? Would that be acceptable? ~~~~Athenaathena07 Athenaathena07 (talk) 14:02, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

You are obliged to declare your COI as described in the guidelines. All drafts have to be submitted for review, and anything that reads like advertising will be deleted. Also, please read up on how to contact other contributors - I've only seen your posts by chance. Deb (talk) 08:00, 13 July 2023 (UTC)

December 2023

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for advertising or promotion.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  0xDeadbeef→∞ (talk to me) 11:05, 11 December 2023 (UTC)