Hello, thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed your changes of the term "confined to a wheelchair" to "uses a wheelchair" in numerous articles. While I believe I understand your motivation for these edits and sympathize with your concerns, the change in wording drastically changes the meaning. Someone who merely "uses" a wheelchair, such as those with limited mobility, does not necessarily use one most or all of the time and is not necessarily immobile without one, and that is the meaning the term "confined" is intended to communicate in the instances in which it has been used. It is particularly a problem when the phrase is changed without regard to the surrounding context, as here, where your change resulted in the sentence, "When asked what it is like to use a wheelchair..."; that is clearly not the intended meaning. We can discuss a substitute term that carries the same connotations as "confined," but "used" is not adequate. It would probably also be best if you were to set forth and discuss in some general public forum your documented sources establishing that "confined" is generally regarded to be unsuitable or insensitive, before you take it upon yourself to remove the phrase from multiple articles. I will watch your talk page for your further thoughts. Cheers, Postdlf (talk) 05:17, 7 September 2009 (UTC)