Archive 1 Archive 2 Archive 3 Archive 4 Archive 5

Your revert on Relationship between religion and science

"I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Relationship between religion and science have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia."

I restored the edit with all external links removed.

16:47, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Mam as you reverted my last edit

You reverted my last edit on Gop Chieftaincy but it wasn't vandalism so I did Undo and restored my edits please check before reverting I added proper citations I didn't did vandalism.Himanshu Kushwaha 01 (talk) 14:24, 20 April 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Wikipedia technical issues and templates request for comment

 

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style on a "Wikipedia technical issues and templates" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 05:30, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

The Copyright Inquisitor's Sword

  Inquisitorial Talwar
This talwar is bestowed upon Asartea for his deeds at CopyPatrol and CCI. This is a blade much suited to dancing between the two labors, though it chops copyright violations all the same. Please accept this extension of your arm, and wield it in the name of the Encyclopedia to smite copyright violations and those who author them. ♠Vami_IV†♠ 06:35, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

Vandal Reverting

I can't seem to get one revert in, you're always there ahead of me! Thanks for the good work. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 12:22, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

@ScottishFinnishRadish: Having the Rollback userright helps a lot, as does using Huggle. And thank you for all your good work. -- Asartea Talk | Contribs 12:24, 22 April 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 April 2021

The Signpost: 25 April 2021

21:23, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Discontent Content Issue 2

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:40, 26 April 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Wikipedia technical issues and templates request for comment

 

Your feedback is requested at Template talk:Gender unclear on a "Wikipedia technical issues and templates" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 12:30, 30 April 2021 (UTC)

WikiCup 2021 May newsletter

The second round of the 2021 WikiCup has now finished; it was a high-scoring round and contestants needed 61 points to advance to Round 3. There were some impressive efforts in the round, with the top eight contestants all scoring more than 400 points. A large number of the points came from the 12 featured articles and the 110 good articles achieved in total by contestants, as well as the 216 good article reviews they performed; the GAN backlog drive and the stay-at-home imperative during the COVID-19 pandemic may have been partially responsible for these impressive figures.

Our top scorers in Round 2 were:

  •   The Rambling Man, with 2963 points from three featured articles, 20 featured article reviews, 37 good articles, 73 good article reviews, as well as 22 DYKs.
  •   Epicgenius, with 1718 points from one featured article, 29 good articles, 16 DYKs and plenty of bonus points.
  •   Bloom6132, with 990 points from 13 DYKs and 64 "In the news" items, mostly recent deaths.
  •   Hog Farm, with 834 points from two featured articles, five good articles, 14 featured article reviews and 15 good article reviews.
  •   Gog the Mild, with 524 points from two featured articles and four featured article reviews.
  •   Lee Vilenski, with 501 points from one featured article, three good articles, six featured article reviews and 25 good article reviews.
  •   Sammi Brie, with 485 points from four good articles, eight good article reviews and 27 DYKs, on US radio and television stations.
  •   Ktin, with 436 points from four good articles, seven DYKs and 11 "In the news" items.

Please remember that DYKs cannot be claimed until they have appeared on the main page. As we enter the third round, any content promoted after the end of Round 2 but before the start of Round 3 can be claimed now, and anything you forgot to claim in Round 2 cannot! Remember too, that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (except for at the end of each round, when you must claim them before the cut-off date/time). When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Judges: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:27, 2 May 2021 (UTC)

15:42, 3 May 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – May 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2021).

 

  Administrator changes

  EnchanterCarlossuarez46

  Interface administrator changes

  Ragesoss

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • The user group oversight will be renamed to suppress. This is for technical reasons. You can comment at T112147 if you have objections.

  Arbitration


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:51, 7 May 2021 (UTC)

15:08, 10 May 2021 (UTC)

Your revert on <Lyft>

<I explained why so i guess your a employee at Uber or you hate lyft because i was removing negative content about lyft and i explained it was due to it affecting the stock price of Lyft https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lyft&diff=1023097379&oldid=1023097005

Negatively affecting stock prices is not a valid reason to remove content. If you want it removed you need to prove, using reliable sources that the content is wrong -- Asartea Talk | Contribs 10:56, 14 May 2021 (UTC)

Discontent Content Issue 3

13:47, 17 May 2021 (UTC)

Your revert on <Draft:North-East Asian Subregional Programme for Environmental Cooperation>

Dear Asartea,

Thank you very much for reviewing the draft "North-East Asian Subregional Programme for Environmental Cooperation" (in short, NEASPEC).

I learned the draft page has been speedily deleted upon the criteria for speedy deletion, particularly "unambiguous advertising". Could you kindly retrieve the deleted page for my future reference or improvement? (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:NEASPEC&action=edit&redlink=1)

As a wiki beginner, it was really hard to create the page so I would like to keep the draft with sources and improve.

I also wonder how international organizations and private companies could have its wiki page as those pages have definitely function as not only encyclopedia but advertisement.

For your information, NEASPEC is operated by UN ESCAP East and North-East Asia Office as Secretariat and ENEA Office has its wiki page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UNESCAP_East_and_North-East_Asia_Office).

ENEA office is one of the subregional offices of UN ESCAP (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Economic_and_Social_Commission_for_Asia_and_the_Pacific), which is one of the five regional commissions under the jurisdiction of UN ECOSOC (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations_Economic_and_Social_Council).

United Nations also have its wiki page (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_Nations).

In this connection, I thought that creating a wiki page for NEASPEC did not violate wiki rules and regulations.

To improve the page for NEASPEC, could you please advise how those IOs and private companies have been accepted in Wiki?

And apologize if I leave the message in a wrong place. It is my first experience so still I am learning wiki tools.

NEASPEC (talk) 06:32, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

@NEASPEC: (talk page stalker) Hello, if you would like to retrieve the article, please go to WP:REFUND. But please bear in mind that articles on Wikipedia need to be written from a neutral point of view, and that paid editing is usually disallowed. ―sportzpikachu my talkcontribs 06:34, 18 May 2021 (UTC)

Re: Not a paid editor

Hello Asartea,

I am not a paid editor. I have no financial interest and have not been compensated in any way regarding the KLSN-LP article. Further, KLSN was a 100% fully volunteer-run organization. No one received any compensation for their participation. The project has been shut down years ago. Please contact me with any other questions or concerns.

PMChristopher (talk) 05:37, 21 May 2021 (UTC)PMChristopher

KLSN-LP Edits

Greetings Asartea,

Thank you for your recent quality edits to KLSN-LP. It is preferred to leave this article as you have currently edited it. Continuously adding or changing items by disgruntled and litigious former participants only serves to confuse readers and misrepresent the facts. The page should be locked. Please contact me with any questions.

PMChristopher (talk) 23:55, 20 May 2021 (UTC) PMChristopher

  • @PMChristopher: Hi, I'm Sammi Brie, a longtime editor on radio and television topics here on Wikipedia, and I'm writing to explain revisions I recently made to KLSN-LP. We are not a court of law, though it seems that people involved with this station have met in one. In the course of keeping an up-to-date encyclopedia, at times we must include verifiable content that may not be desirable for all people's reputations. This is why we have policies on neutral point of view, biographies of living persons, and conflicts of interest. I have used some of the sources (East Bay Times, The Press, FCC filings and letters) that were in previous article revisions, because these are reliable sources, and—though potentially not flattering to one or the other party—the information contained within is factual. We do not "lock" pages off from editing for indefinite time periods; we only do so temporarily and in cases of extreme vandalism or user disputes. I hope you understand that I have sought to strike a balance between points of view while incorporating information that meets our standards for inclusion on this encyclopedia. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 05:43, 21 May 2021 (UTC)


Hello Asartea,
The KLSN-LP page has been changed again. The person changing it is a disgruntled former volunteer who hopes to cast negative and false unsubstantiated aspersions on myself as the former general manager. I request that the recent edits be removed and your original edits from 5/19/21 be restored. Please feel free to contact me for any clarification.
@PMChristopher: Please read my comments above to you. I am not Jeff Brown; I am a longtime editor familiar with the topic area of radio stations and our policies and guidelines. Sammi Brie (she/her • tc) 05:49, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Your revert on Maya codices

I don't get it why you don't think that's constructive. You reverted everything, not just that edit. The article is about Maya, not about the Aztec. Explain yourself please. 86.83.56.115 (talk) 17:49, 22 May 2021 (UTC)

17:05, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment

 

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Notability (people) on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:31, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Discontent Content Issue 4

17:04, 31 May 2021 (UTC)

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 21

Feedback request: Wikipedia policies and guidelines request for comment

 

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Iymen Chehade on a "Wikipedia policies and guidelines" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 21:31, 2 June 2021 (UTC)

20:01, 7 June 2021 (UTC)

Contest speedy deletion.

Here is my article of Siri Gautama Sambudharaja Maligawa (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Siri_Gautama_Sambuddharaja_Maligawa). You have tagged speedy deletion for that page. But, I wrote this article with their full knowledge. I have evidence to prove it. There is no infringement of any kind here. Please consider. Thank you! Shanuka Shehan Kumara (talk) 18:27, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – June 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2021).

 

  Administrator changes

  AshleyyoursmileLess Unless
  HusondMattWadeMJCdetroitCariocaVague RantKingboykThunderboltzGwen GaleAniMateSlimVirgin (deceased)

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • Wikimedia previously used the IRC network Freenode. However, due to changes over who controlled the network with reports of a forceful takeover by several ex-staff members, the Wikimedia IRC Group Contacts decided to move to the new Libera Chat network. It has been reported that Wikimedia related channels on Freenode have been forcibly taken over if they pointed members to Libera. There is a migration guide and Wikimedia discussions about this.

  Arbitration


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:45, 9 June 2021 (UTC)

J. B. Gribble

Hi Asartea! At first I bristled at the thought I'd been copyvio'd, then looked further and understood the situation, well sort of. Special:Contributions/Hepromas has in four hours made more contribs than I have in a month. And on a wider range of articles than my ten years. I don't know if it's my business to report this curious behavior. Doug butler (talk) 11:07, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

@Doug butler: Hi Firefly and I have just gone through their contributions after that copyvio, and we unfortunately enough had to revert most of them. In future for especially bad cases you can report people to WP:ANI, but this editor wasn't near to that level yet. -- Asartea Talk | Contribs 11:25, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
Thanks. Doug butler (talk) 11:31, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

20:25, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

hello

I ask you and I agree to stay on this page. Because this is my second article, I am asking for your help. For page Mahyar Ghaseemi Thanks a lot.France 24 (talk) 19:07, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

Discontent Content Issue 5

15:47, 21 June 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 27 June 2021

16:30, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of ROUND Methodology

Hello, I understand why you would delete the draft, but I do not think it cannot be edited to match Wikipedia standards. Is it possible if you'd reconsider? If its for the account name, I had a wrong misunderstanding on how wiki accounts work. --Cglobalc (talk) 06:03, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

@Cglobalc: Hi, unofrunaley enough the page has already been deleted, so I cannot help you any further. However if you wish to retrieve a copy of it to continue editing it you can either contact the deleting administrator here or ask at WP:REFUND. Hope this helps you. -- Asartea Talk | Contribs 06:18, 30 June 2021 (UTC)

Your revert on Samuel A. Tannenbaum

Hi, Asartea- I am Dr Edward J Hyman, the Chief Forensic Officer and Scientific Director of the National Institutes of Forensic and Behavioral Sciences. I am the grandnephew of Sam Tannenbaum, the son of the daughter he never had, his beloved niece Edith Tannenbaum. Sam's son Herman was my mom's favorite cousin, and was such a prominent figure in our lives, that he was the second most frequent male in our house after our father, Herb Hyman. My brohter, mother, uncle, Michael Kazin, Alfred Kazin, and my father Herb Hyman were the sources. Any questions, you can call me at (xxx)xxx-xxxx, my cell, which is a better way to get hold of me than any other Thanks - Ed Hyman.

Hi. On Wikipedia we require all content to be supported by reliable sources, so we can verify the information. I reverted your addition to Samuel A. Tannenbaum because it lacked such sources, which are required, and because it didn't appear to be written in an encyclopedic tone. Also, being a family member of the subject of the article means you have a conflict of interest (simple guide here) towards the subject. Our policy on conflicts on interest requires you to disclose this when making any edits to a subject you have a conflict of interest with, and its highly encouraged you instead make edit requests on the articles talkpage, a guide to which can be found here, and a tool to assist you with making the actual request can be found here. I hope this helps you. -- Asartea Talk | Contribs 15:38, 1 July 2021 (UTC)

WikiCup 2021 July newsletter

The third round of the 2021 WikiCup has now come to an end. Each of the sixteen contestants who made it into the fourth round had at least 294 points, and our top six scorers all had over 600 points. They were:

  •   The Rambling Man, with 1825 points from 3 featured articles, 44 featured article reviews, 14 good articles, 30 good article reviews and 10 DYKs. In addition, he completed a 34-article good topic on the EFL Championship play-offs.
  •   Epicgenius, a New York specialist, with 1083 points from 2 featured article reviews, 18 good articles, 30 DYKs and plenty of bonus points.
  •   Bloom6132, with 869 points from 11 DYKs, all with bonus points, and 54 "In the news" items, mostly covering people who had recently died.
  •   Gog the Mild, with 817 points from 3 featured articles on historic battles in Europe, 5 featured article reviews and 3 good articles.
  •   Hog Farm, with 659 points from 2 featured articles and 2 good articles on American Civil War battles, 18 featured article reviews, 2 good articles, 6 good article reviews and 4 DYKs.
  •   BennyOnTheLoose, a snooker specialist and new to the Cup, with 647 points from a featured article, 2 featured article reviews, 6 good articles, 6 good article reviews and 3 DYKs.

In round three, contestants achieved 19 featured articles, 7 featured lists, 106 featured article reviews, 72 good articles, 1 good topic, 62 good article reviews, 165 DYKs and 96 ITN items. We enter the fourth round with scores reset to zero; any content promoted after the end of round 3 but before the start of round 4 can be claimed in round 4. Please also remember that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them (one contestant in round 3 lost out because of this). When doing GARs, please make sure that you check that all the GA criteria are fully met.

If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article nominations, a featured process, or anything else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Judges: Sturmvogel 66 (talk) and Cwmhiraeth Cwmhiraeth (talk) MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:29, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – July 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (June 2021).

  Guideline and policy news

  • Consensus has been reached to delete all books in the book namespace. There was rough consensus that the deleted books should still be available on request at WP:REFUND even after the namespace is removed.
  • An RfC is open to discuss the next steps following a trial which automatically applied pending changes to TFAs.

  Technical news

  • IP addresses of unregistered users are to be hidden from everyone. There is a rough draft of how IP addresses may be shown to users who need to see them. This currently details allowing administrators, checkusers, stewards and those with a new usergroup to view the full IP address of unregistered users. Editors with at least 500 edits and an account over a year old will be able to see all but the end of the IP address in the proposal. The ability to see the IP addresses hidden behind the mask would be dependent on agreeing to not share the parts of the IP address they can see with those who do not have access to the same information. Accessing part of or the full IP address of a masked editor would also be logged. Comments on the draft are being welcomed at the talk page.

  Arbitration


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:26, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

17:31, 5 July 2021 (UTC)

Thank you for participating in my RFA

I appreciate your offer of trust. I want to be of service, but will admit my human-ness. I expect to fail on occasion. Please contact me if ever your trust in me is tested. BusterD (talk) 21:02, 13 July 2021 (UTC)

15:29, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

Vandalism revert warning

You have left a revert warning on my talk page referring to " Please do not attack other editors, as you did at Wikipedia talk:Help desk" I am really sorry if I have did anything as such. To best of my knowledge, I have never done anything as such. Can you please refer to the link indicating what exactly I have done so that I can check myself. Still I am really sorry if my actions have hurt anyone Mainakchatterjee.tech (talk) 08:33, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Mainakchatterjee.tech, Asartea probably referred to this. If you have a problem with ArnabSaha, you should take it up directly with him. Always assume good faith on the part of other editors. Also, please read WP:NPA. Wilhelm Tell DCCXLVI converse | fings wot i hav dun 11:56, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 25 July 2021

Discontent Content Issue 6

21:09, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – July 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2021).

  Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC is open to add a delay of one week from nomination to deletion for G13 speedy deletions.

  Technical news

  • Last week all wikis were very slow or not accessible for 30 minutes. This was due to server lag caused by regenerating dynamic lists on the Russian Wikinews after a large bulk import. (T287380)

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:17, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

A bowl of strawberries for you!

  For your efforts in attempting to sort the mess at Category:Nations at beauty pageants. JBchrch talk 18:02, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

20:45, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

16:18, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

19:25, 16 August 2021 (UTC)

21:57, 23 August 2021 (UTC)

Read-only reminder

A maintenance operation will be performed on Wednesday August 25 06:00 UTC. It should only last for a few minutes.

Also during this time, operations on the CentralAuth will not be possible (GlobalRenames, changing/confirming e-mail addresses, logging into new wikis, password changes).

For more details about the operation and on all impacted services, please check on Phabricator.

A banner will be displayed 30 minutes before the operation.

Please help your community to be aware of this maintenance operation. Thank you!

20:33, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

The Signpost: 29 August 2021

15:59, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

WikiCup 2021 September newsletter

The fourth round of the competition has finished with over 500 points being required to qualify for the final round. It was a hotly competitive round with two contestants,   The Rambling Man and   Epicgenius, each scoring over 3000 points, and six contestants scoring over 1000. All but one of the finalists achieved one or more FAs during the round, the exception being   Bloom6132 who demonstrated that 61 "in the news" items produces an impressive number of points. Other contestants who made it to the final are   Gog the Mild,   Lee Vilenski,   BennyOnTheLoose,   Amakuru and   Hog Farm. However, all their points are now swept away and everyone starts afresh in the final round.

Round 4 saw the achievement of 18 featured articles and 157 good articles.   Bilorv scored for a 25-article good topic on Black Mirror but narrowly missed out on qualifying for the final round. There was enthusiasm for FARs, with 89 being performed, and there were 63 GARs and around 100 DYKs during the round. As we start round 5, we say goodbye to the eight competitors who didn't quite make it to the final round; thank you for the useful contributions you have made to the Cup and Wikipedia, and we hope you will join us again next year. For other contestants, remember that any content promoted after the end of round 4 but before the start of round 5 can be claimed in round 5. Remember too that you must claim your points within 14 days of "earning" them.

If you are concerned that your nomination, whether it be for a good article, a featured process, or anything else, will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews Needed (remember to remove your listing when no longer required). If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove your name from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. Sturmvogel 66 and Cwmhiraeth. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:01, 2 September 2021 (UTC)

Feedback request: Wikipedia technical issues and templates request for comment

 

Your feedback is requested at Template talk:Primary sources on a "Wikipedia technical issues and templates" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 15:31, 5 September 2021 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – September 2021

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2021).

 

  Administrator changes

  Jake Wartenberg
  EmperorViridian Bovary
  AshleyyoursmileViridian Bovary

  Guideline and policy news

  Technical news

  • The Score extension has been re-enabled on public wikis. It has been updated, but has been placed in safe mode to address unresolved security issues. Further information on the security issues can be found on the mediawiki page.

  Arbitration

  Miscellaneous


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:44, 3 September 2021 (UTC)

Reply-link officially superseded by DiscussionTools

Hi! Reply-link has officially been superseded by mw:DiscussionTools, which you can install using the "Discussion tools" checkbox under Preferences → Beta features. DiscussionTools, developed by the WMF's Editing Team, is faster and has more features than reply-link, and it wouldn't make sense for me to keep developing reply-link. I think the Editing Team is doing amazing work, and look forward to what they can do in the future. Thank you for using reply-link over the years! Enterprisey (talk!) 06:11, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

15:18, 6 September 2021 (UTC)

15:31, 13 September 2021 (UTC)