WeBL edit

Sorry, but I can't take your word for it. How will we know if the article will pass notability guidelines? Can boxingtalk.com give us evidence of notability though sources? If they can answer those questions, I will reconsider. Sr13 16:13, 23 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

boxingtalk.com will create on article on the subject, am I right on that? Well, even if an article is published, the notability guideline for web content says that "The content itself has been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent of the site itself." Do you have any other reliable sources? Sr13 18:23, 23 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
If no reliable sources are currently published, then I can't help you. And no, a college professor doesn't need to publish anything to become notable. Maybe an established sports magazine or website will write about it. You need to prove that reliable sources are published before you make an article, not the other way around. When you do find established sources, contact me again or take your case to deletion review and editors will form a consensus there. Hope this helps, and happy editing! Sr13 19:29, 23 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
Sorry, I was in a bit of a rush and forgot to address that to you. Multiple would technically mean two or three, depending on who you're talking to. Sr13 04:04, 24 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
In addition: When you do find the sources, contact me and I can possibly undelete the previous content. Sr13 04:05, 24 July 2007 (UTC)Reply
Also, you can read the general notability guideline for guidance. Sr13 06:38, 24 July 2007 (UTC)Reply