User talk:Arnav Bhate/Archive 1

Archive 1

A belated welcome!

The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Arnav Bhate! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introductory tutorial
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Writing an article
• Five pillars of Wikipedia
• Community portal
• Help pages
• The Teahouse (newcomer help)
• Main help desk

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! paul2520 💬 14:10, 10 February 2023 (UTC)

Air india 777 200lr

Bro what the fuck is wrong with you! The source does NOT say anything about Air india retiring 2 777. Either the source provided is incorrect or you have entered wrong information. Please either put a different source that says it, or leave the notes blank for the 777-200LR. Or else i will have to report your shit to an administrator. Information cannot be displayed without a valid source that actually says it. Changi001 (talk) 18:11, 22 June 2023 (UTC)

You got the wrong person. You want User talk:NikhilW10. I reread the article and now I agree with you so I had left your change alone. Arnav Bhate (talk) 03:30, 23 June 2023 (UTC)

Kya dikkat hai bhai thodi si research krle aircraft abhi bhi Singapore me hi hai NikhilW10 (talk) 08:18, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

Aap manav nhi mahamanav hai NikhilW10 (talk) 13:51, 22 July 2023 (UTC)

Restoration of Template:Vande Bharat Express

Hey @Arnav Bhate, The last update in that page done by me was an addition of the wikipage link. Those colour additions were done by another person named @Harshul12345. Kindly correct that issue. My last update was the addition of new wikipage for the upcoming train. Just wanted to let you know about it. Thank you. Sameer2905 (talk) 07:21, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

I restored the page to the last update done by you. I reverted all changes after that. The wikilink that you added is still there. Arnav Bhate (talk) 18:09, 21 August 2023 (UTC)

Your InternetArchiveBot run appears to be stuck

Hai! InternetArchiveBot runs #14931 and #14932 (submitted by you) seem to be going very wonky - they says they've run through the full list of pages, but apparently haven't realized that they need to finish the jobs and release their bot workers for other use. Could you maybe try manually killing the jobs and see if that clears up the issue? Whoop whoop pull up ^{Bitching Betty ⚧️ Averted crashes} 15:24, 10 September 2023 (UTC)

I've killed the jobs. The website was not loading for me (error 504) before. It might be related. Arnav Bhate (talk) 14:31, 11 September 2023 (UTC)

kaay bhau...

aapn VB train che fan distaay 122.172.82.166 (talk) 10:48, 3 November 2023 (UTC)

Arnav Bhate bhai aap sahi edit or support mujhe karte ho bahut aache se Rewa vande bharat redirect Kar दिया aur bhai aage future mein help chahiye hogi in wikipedia articles then will ping you up or tag in the message. Taj04 (talk) 16:11, 8 November 2023 (UTC)

Redirect is the best option.

Hi. I appreciate you for opening Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rewa–Bhopal Vande Bharat Express (2nd nomination). But since the nominator of the previous AFD agreed to redirect the article to Rani Kamalapati (Habibganj)–Rewa Vande Bharat Express, the best option was to do the same. So I kindly request you to withdraw the nomination and redirect the article to Rani Kamalapati (Habibganj)–Rewa Vande Bharat Express. If you face any difficulty in doing so, kindly let me know. Thanks. Thilsebatti (talk) 03:18, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

I agree with the result of the previous AfD but there are others who are reverting. So I am going to keep the AfD open. Also, I think what you are suggesting is a violation of non-admin closure policy so I am not going to do that. Arnav Bhate (talk) 07:08, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Since you are the nominator, you can close the AFD if there are no objections. All the three votes in the AFD are to redirect. It was an IP who earlier redirected the article which is why it got reverted. But since I'm the creator of the article, I think nobody would revert if I redirect it. If you still have concerns closing the AFD, do let me know and I will close the discussion and redirect the article. Thanks. Thilsebatti (talk) 07:45, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

Ok, I have closed it. Arnav Bhate (talk) 12:43, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:56, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

December 2023

Your recent editing history at Air India shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.
Per WP:BRD, you need to provide a proper source for what you claim and also discuss, but you seem to choose to blindly revert. See here. Consider this your last warning. — LeoFrank  ^Talk 07:01, 27 December 2023 (UTC)

Your source supports my point. Only 50 are for IX. The article does not talk about the remaining 50. So it is you who have to provide a source. Arnav Bhate (talk) 05:43, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

My source supports my point that the MAXs are meant only for Air India Express and not the full service Air India, yet you don't seem to support the your invalid point with a source! Still ignoring facts and blindly reverting! — LeoFrank  ^Talk 08:33, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

My edit has been to remove the entry of the MAXs from the fleet table altogether, and you keep reinstating but your arguments are totally contrary to your reverts! — LeoFrank  ^Talk 08:35, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

The source says "Over the next 15 months, a total of 50 new B737 MAX aircraft will join the LCC fleet, allowing us to grow our network to new destinations and increase flights on existing routes,". If the remaining 140 were also for IX, wouldn't they be mentioned as well? This says AI ordered 190 737s, this says IX will get 50. It does not talk about the remaining 140. You are doing WP:SYNTHESIS by saying that the remaining 140 are also for IX. I am not going to revert right now. Let's come to a consensus before any further edits. Arnav Bhate (talk) 13:00, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

Also, I returned the article to its original state before the edit war. It was not me, but you who made the bold edit. Arnav Bhate (talk) 13:02, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

you are still stubborn on restoring it despite you not proving that AI as an airline has ordered the MAX

The Boeing source, already in the article, says that Air India ordered them, not Air India Express. Arnav Bhate (talk) 13:05, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

No, you are wrong! the 737 MAXs were ordered from the AI group as a whole. Show a source that says AI mainline will use the 737 MAX! — LeoFrank  ^Talk 16:42, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

There is no source that the 140 MAXs are for AI just like there is none that they are for IX if you want to interpret it that way. Arnav Bhate (talk) 10:52, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

Nowhere does the source say all MAXs are for IX. Arnav Bhate (talk) 13:06, 28 December 2023 (UTC)

The Boeing order/delivery data mentioned 3 MAXs have been delivered to AI, whereas it was delivered to IX and they are already operational as well. So, let's stick to IX orders of the MAXs, which is 50. With UK also having the 320 NEO family, it is unlikely the mainline will operate the MAX as well. When there is no clarity, why do you even want to add something to an article? — LeoFrank  ^Talk 16:49, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

There is no clarity. I agree on that. I think, then that the order for 140 should remain on the AI fleet page until we know that they are for IX. Arnav Bhate (talk) 10:53, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

We can add a note that says that these may be for IX. Arnav Bhate (talk) 10:55, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

@LeoFrank if you don't respond in a long time, I will add the MAXs back. Arnav Bhate (talk) 13:29, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

WP:THREAT? Just look at the shear arrogance in the above message. — LeoFrank  ^Talk 16:43, 29 December 2023 (UTC)

Not a threat. Sorry if it came off that way. I just wanted to say that I want a resolution. Just so you know, WP:THREAT is about legal threats and I can't see anyone could interpret my reply as one. Arnav Bhate (talk) 10:50, 30 December 2023 (UTC)

I have found a source that all 190 MAXs are for IX. I guess we can close this discussion. Arnav Bhate (talk) 10:23, 1 January 2024 (UTC)

Reverting sockpuppets

In general, edits by abusive sockpuppets are broadly rolled back, unless there's an obvious reason not to that does not call on specialist knowledge.You are welcome to reinstate their good edits, keeping in mind that those edits then become your responsibility. WP:RBI applies to the edits made by the sockpuppet account, good edits by responsible editors are always welcome. Acroterion (talk) 13:15, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Ok. Arnav Bhate (talk) 13:54, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Pls unlock List of Vande Bharat Services page for other editors

List of Vande Bharat Express services is locked for past 4-5 days and hindering other editors to update the proposed services list and some useful edits in updating the launch order which is done wrong firstly in the 9 and 10th vb which is 10th one as 9th and 9th one as 10th and other services also. Pls kindly inform adminstrators to unlock page and best solution to ban the users involved in wrong activities Omalur Sharma (talk) 03:53, 8 January 2024 (UTC)

I am not an administrator. Please contact them directly. Arnav Bhate (talk) 07:42, 8 January 2024 (UTC)