Welcome edit

Hello, ArifSingh99999, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask at the help desk, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to help you get started. Happy editing! Liz Read! Talk! 16:07, 5 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Getting started
Finding your way around
Editing articles
Getting help
How you can help


  Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 14:17, 5 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

ArifSingh99999, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit

 

Hi ArifSingh99999! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GreenMeansGo (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:03, 5 December 2020 (UTC)

December 2020 edit

  Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions. Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to lose their editing privileges on that page. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to result in loss of your editing privileges. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 16:09, 5 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

Do whatever you want to do ArifSingh99999 (talk) 08:48, 12 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

December 2020 edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Siddharth Varadarajan has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 08:40, 12 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Please explain your contributions using a descriptive edit summary. Changing information on Wikipedia (such as numbers and dates) without explanation, as you did at Siddharth Varadarajan, may be confused with vandalism. Thank you. h 08:47, 12 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at Siddharth Varadarajan, you may be blocked from editing. h 08:48, 12 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you engage in subtle vandalism on Wikipedia, as you did at University of Allahabad. Stop trying to change information (like numbers and dates) without explanation immediately. h 08:51, 12 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 09:06, 12 December 2020 (UTC)Reply