April Fools Day After
April 2017 edit
Hello, I'm Acroterion. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Shayrat Air Base, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Acroterion (talk) 02:54, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
It was on CBS News on Tv.
- We'll need a direct source, not what you saw on TV, and it should be reported by more than just one news outlet. Acroterion (talk) 02:58, 8 April 2017 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Talk:Donald Trump. TonyBallioni (talk) 18:01, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
- You vandalized a valid edit, Tony
Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:Donald Trump for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article; not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. Sundayclose (talk) 18:07, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 20:46, 9 April 2017 (UTC)so unreasonable edit
April Fools Day After (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
simply made a reasonable request on Donald Trump's talk page, it was falsely called vandalism, then when I inquired in one noticeboard, it was removed and called forum shopping. If it is forbidden to post on Trump because of unwritten censorship, just let me know and I will abide by it. Thank you. Please help as I have to do school assignments on Wikipedia and being blocked will cause problems with my report to the teacher. Either that or it will be a civic lesson on how wild Wikipedia is. Help!
Decline reason:
I seriously considered revoking your talk page access, as you are clearly trolling here, too. But I decided against it. WP:LASTCHANCE pretty much guarantees you'll lose access after your next unblock request. Yamla (talk) 21:05, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Block review at the Administrators' noticeboard edit
I have requested a review of my block at the administrators' noticeboard. Since you are blocked you will not be able to comment directly, but if you would like to comment please post here. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 10:44, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
Indefinite block is like a life sentence or death penalty. Not right when there are questions about the block. If you want to punish me, make it end this Friday. That is my compromise to accept some punishment for Abu Ivanka and other crimes.
The Faroe Islands is not having an election today. Also use of the word today isn't right if someone isn't checking the article often.
Several sources including the BBC and The Guardian, a British newspaper, report Abu Ivanka.
Puerto Rico is part of the US, not independent, not Russia, not Jamaica. Nothing sinister.
Nothing was meant against the USAF. It was a stub that I was certain others would expand.
Also there is an error that millions of people are not fixing. 60 missiles were fired, not 59. 59 hit Syria, 1 hit the water. There are reliable sources but nobody else is looking for them.
- I'll copy this to your block appeal. Just as an FYI, I'm going to assume good faith and comment that I think you should be given a last chance, but your edits come off very strong, and are on topics that could come off as trolling. The status of Puerto Rico is very much a sore topic for many, and considering that most places in the US don't say something like
Bob was born in Detroit, Michigan, USA
it can come off as trying to make a point in an area with ethnic, political, and racial tension.Today
in English can also mean in the present time, so the change there seems hyper literal and others could view it as disruptive given your username and other issues. Pointing out that he is called The Donald or Abu Ivanka while then posting a post about Wikipedia needing to look out for partisan hacks also looked like you were trying to troll us, which is why I reverted and warned you. Reporting me to AE after that didn't help your cause there. As a piece of advice: I think if you are unblocked it would be wise to change your username as well as create a userpage. You're making contentious edits in areas where people are going to assume you are trying to disrupt even if you aren't. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:47, 10 April 2017 (UTC)
please block me edit
Please block me for 60 hours, ending Friday. See the Administrators Noticeboard for others saying unblock should happen. I am not asking from unblock because Yamla said I would lose talk page privileges if I asked to be unblocked. Thanks.
Unblocked edit
I have unblocked you, as my original indefinite block was unduly harsh. However, please see the note from TonyBallioni above, I believe he has given you good advice. You are welcome to make constructive edits to Wikipedia, but please mind our biographies of living persons policy which requires that a reliable source is included whenever an edit is made which adds or changes any information about a living person which may be considered controversial. There are two tests for this: if you are wondering if you need to provide a source then you should, and if other users ask you for a source then you must provide one. Also, talk pages are for discussing improvements to articles and may not be used as a forum for discussing your opinions on a topic. Lastly, please mind our policy on civility. If you have any questions please ask here or at the help desk. Thank you. Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 12:06, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
Please carefully read this information:
The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding all edits about, and all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.
Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you that sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.Ivanvector (Talk/Edits) 12:13, 12 April 2017 (UTC)
April 2017 edit
 | This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Bbb23 (talk) 10:38, 13 April 2017 (UTC) |
please explain edit
What is this block for????
please explain edit
What is this block for???? I have no sockpuppet. I hope this isn't an excuse for blocking.
- I asked my teacher and she said that Wikipedia is not always fair. Since my block is for the rest of my life, maybe 70 years, she said I might have to wait a while then sneak back in Wikipedia when the school year is over. Sorry I have to do this. This probably makes some people who are blocked in Wikipedia very, very, very mad. Good bye.
April Fools Day After (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I asked my teacher about this and was told to 1. Ask that the checkuser, Bbb23, decide on unblock and not any administrator, 2. Ask that I be blocked but that it should expire on June 1, 3. That I avoid the Trump article even though I only had 2 minor comments about it (because he is so controversial), 4. To let Bbb23 know that the original blocking administrator did unblock me, which shows that my behavior was not bad, 5. That I should write a report about this and turn it in to her by early June before school is over for the summer. Thank you. I hope you can agree with my teacher that her plan is sensible.
Decline reason:
Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 22:31, 15 April 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.