AppleWormBoy

WPVI or WLNE logos? (There's more than one ABC affiliate on channel 6...)

We're not under any WP:DEADLINE to 'update' a logo. ABC affiliates continue to use the gloss version on-air and online interchangeably, and the logo has not changed so much that we need a new one immediately. The old one conveys just as much as the 'current' version and I'm in no rush to change until a high quality image is found. Nate • (chatter) 20:52, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

At that, WPVI hasn't even instituted the matte logo as far as I see; all the newscast graphics and online presences have kept the gloss logo. Nate • (chatter) 23:40, 28 November 2013 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Back to Black

Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've begun reviewing the article Back to Black you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of HĐ -- HĐ (talk) 07:01, 23 May 2019 (UTC)

Your GA nomination of Back to Black

The article Back to Black you nominated as a good article has passed ; see Talk:Back to Black for comments about the article. Well done! If the article has not already been on the main page as an "In the news" or "Did you know" item, you can nominate it to appear in Did you know. Message delivered by Legobot, on behalf of H? -- H? (talk) 09:01, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for June 4

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Back to Black, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Estelle (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 4 June 2019 (UTC)

When copying within Wikipedia

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Second British Invasion into Pop music. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. If you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required.--S Philbrick(Talk) 12:55, 8 June 2019 (UTC)

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (2nd request)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Surf music into Pop music. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 13:35, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

Response

I won't be helping with that article as I'm not too familiar with the subject, but good luck. --Kyle Peake (talk) 10:15, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Thanks, Kyle. :) -AppleWormBoy (talk) 11:17, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Back to Black

Hello! Your submission of Back to Black at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Hawkeye7 (discuss) 03:12, 18 June 2019 (UTC)

Quarter Million Award for Back to Black

	The Quarter Million Award
	For your contributions to bring Back to Black (estimated annual readership: 264,927) to Good Article status, I hereby present you the Quarter Million Award. Congratulations on this rare accomplishment, and thanks for all you do for Wikipedia's readers! Reidgreg (talk) 21:53, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

Thanks for your work improving and promoting this highly read article! – Reidgreg (talk) 21:53, 10 July 2019 (UTC)

No problem. -AppleWormBoy 23:21, 11 July 2019

DYK for Back to Black

On 14 July 2019, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Back to Black, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that Back to Black, the final studio album by Amy Winehouse, topped the European Top 100 Albums chart for 13 non-consecutive weeks? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Back to Black. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Back to Black), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

— Maile (talk) 00:01, 14 July 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

FAN for Aftermath (Rolling Stones album)

Hi AppleWormBoy. I recently opened a featured-article nomination for Aftermath (Rolling Stones album). I found your name at Rockism and poptimism's edit history and wanted to let you know, in case you would be interested in offering a review, which would be much appreciated if you have the time and interest. Thank you. isento (talk) 14:11, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

Sure, I'll take a gander at it soon. —AppleWormBoy (talk) 14:29, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:34, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:KCOY 12 Current Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:KCOY 12 Current Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:40, 22 September 2021 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:KTTZ-TV.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:KTTZ-TV.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:29, 9 August 2023 (UTC)