Anthrophilos
Disambiguation link notification for January 6 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of important publications in philosophy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Difference (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:42, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 14 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- 1980 in philosophy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Donald Davidson
- 2001 in philosophy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Atopia
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:14, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
Ways to improve 1985 in philosophy edit
Hi, I'm Alpedio. Anthrophilos, thanks for creating 1985 in philosophy!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. There are no citations, and no sources in this article. Please add both. Good luck! --Alpedio
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. —Preceding undated comment added 19:56, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 21 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- 1986 in philosophy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to David Lewis
- List of important publications in anthropology (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to William Ray
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of 1991 in philosophy edit
Hello Anthrophilos,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged 1991 in philosophy for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Binko71100 (talk) 18:48, 21 January 2013 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 28 edit
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1900 in philosophy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Logical Investigations (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:48, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
Hello. As a member of a social anthropology department I am aware that the four field approach is not global. However, forensic anthropology is a sub field of Physical (biological) anthropology and listed there. Philosophical anthropology is a field of philosophy, not anthropology. Anthropology is a social science. As this navbox was created to guide people through the academic discipline, some distinctions need to be maintained.
Thanks a lot for your contributions. If you are on Skype we could have a fruitful discussion. Do you know if there is a way to send private messages here on Wikipedia? Anthropology is an umbrella term claimed by a wide range of disciplines and in that sense I have to disagree with you that "Anthropology is a social science". "Social anthropology" is a social science. "Biological anthropology" seeks to understand human beings and human life through "biological methods" while "philosophical anthropology" seeks to do so through "philosophical methods". Anthrophilos (talk) 18:53, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
If you go to your user preferences and turn on wiki mail, you can send private messages that way.
From your user name, its clear this is a subject of great importance to you. The categorization of disciplines is certainly never clear, but any academic program I have found for philosophical anthropology has been in philosophy departments. It is clearly an area of interdisciplinary dialogue (indeed I've listened to many of Ian Hacking's talks with great interest). But I know of no department of anthropology (4 field or social), or dept of anthropology and sociology that offers a course in this subject. As for the other 3 fields, I can 't pretend to write pages for them but do hope to encourage knowledgeable experts to contribute.
Move List of important publications in anthropology edit
I have requested that List of important publications in anthropology be moved to Bibliography of anthropology. Your comments on this request are most welcome. Please see Talk:List of important publications in anthropology#Requested move. Thanks, and happy editing, Cnilep (talk) 02:55, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
At your request Anthrophilos, I commented on the talk page Talk:List of important publications in anthropology. I explained on the talk page that I favor retaining the "List of ..." title rather than changing over to the "Bibliography of ..." title.Iss246 (talk) 03:47, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
The Teahouse Turns One! edit
It's been an exciting year for the Teahouse and you were a part of it. Thanks so much for visiting, asking questions, sharing answers, being friendly and helpful, and just keeping Teahouse an awesome place. You can read more about the impact we're having and the reflections of other guests and hosts like you. Please come by the Teahouse to celebrate with us, and enjoy this sparkly cupcake badge as our way of saying thank you. And, Happy Birthday!
|
Teahouse First Birthday Badge |
| Awarded to everyone who participated in the Wikipedia Teahouse during its first year! To celebrate the many hosts and guests we've met and the nearly 2000 questions asked and answered during this excellent first year, we're giving out this tasty cupcake badge. |
- --Ocaasi and the rest of the Teahouse Team 22:32, 27 February 2013 (UTC)
Sidebar edit
The truth is that the "philosophy sidebar" was only meant to be included on pages which are linked on it. It has been put all kinds of other places, but they will probably be removed at some point. All of the important links are in the infoboxes, and there are plenty of articles that need them that still don't have them.Greg Bard (talk) 12:22, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
- Ah ok, I wasn't aware of that. Thanks, Greg. Anthrophilos (talk) 14:05, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
- I also came here to say that it's not always appropriate to add the sidebar, and adding them all directly under the infobox has pushed other images out of place. There are several templates for use at the end of articles, and some are more specific, e.g. ethics, social and political philosophy, and the generic philosophy topics template. When these templates are placed at the end, they don't get in the way of text and images. SlimVirgin (talk) 16:55, 4 March 2013 (UTC)
Template:International literary awards has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Legend of Zorro 19:01, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
Template:Philosophy awards has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Legend of Zorro 19:16, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
Template:Newman Prize for Chinese Literature has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. The Legend of Zorro 19:20, 6 July 2013 (UTC)
Hello. Please note that navigation templates are placed underneath the external links [1]. --Omnipaedista (talk) 09:05, 5 November 2013 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:53, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of 1623 in philosophy for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 1623 in philosophy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/1623 in philosophy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. » Shadowowl | talk 10:43, 14 September 2018 (UTC)