August 2022 edit

 

Hello Andrew Tevis. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Andrew Tevis. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Andrew Tevis|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. eh bien mon prince (talk) 09:54, 24 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello. Thank you, for your message. I am not being compensated or paid either directly or indirectly for any of my edits, nor do I expect to be, nor do I have any financial stake in promoting anything I might write about. I am somewhat bemused by the contrary impression you have arrived at and I would be grateful if you could cite the edits which I have made, or contributions I have made on talk pages, which have given rise to your concerns and why you have such concerns? I think all of my contributions have been factually accurate, balanced and succinct. My recent edits/talk contribs have concerned Owen Oyston, a convicted criminal, Dominic Mohan, a former journalist, Nick Parker, a journalist recently implicated in illegal information gathering, Cutler & Gross, a firm whose spectacles I wear and collect, the pop band the Rubettes, who recently featured in news reports about an IP dispute (I remember them from my childhood) and the serial killers John Duffy and David Mulcahy, who attended the same school as I did (Haverstock). Apart from that, I have made minor edits to a page for a book called The Bed & Breakfast star, and a page for a Chinese rock band called Brain Failure. These latter two were pages suggested to me by Wiki Help, while I have been looking to broaden my editing abilities and generally help. Historically, I have contributed to pages about subjects I hear about in the news or socially which interest me. Thank you. Andrew Tevis (talk) 21:00, 25 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure! edit

 
Hi Andrew Tevis! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 17:33, Tuesday, January 10, 2023 (UTC)

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure! edit

 
Hi Andrew Tevis! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 18:37, Tuesday, January 10, 2023 (UTC)