Andrew Kirschner

Image copyright problem with Image:Suffolk_County_Towns_and_Villages.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Suffolk_County_Towns_and_Villages.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Image legality questions. 13:02, 5 April 2006 (UTC)

It looks like you've reuploaded this image with false copyright information. You marked the image as public domain, even though your summary and the source website clearly indicates copyright with all rights reserved. Please refrain from uploading images with incorrect copyright information. Thanks, Pagrashtak 21:40, 23 June 2006 (UTC)

It's from the Suffolk County website. I'm not sure what sort of copyright tag to put on it.

Andrew

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello Andrew Kirschner! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 941 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Dan Mishkin - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 01:18, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Elton John

Hello,

I've noticed that you've made some very useful edits to some Elton John articles on wikipedia in the past, most notably these three edits (listed below) to his Greatest Hits albums.

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Elton_John%27s_Greatest_Hits_Volume_II&diff=52673857&oldid=52302456 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Elton_John%27s_Greatest_Hits_Vol._3&diff=53678777&oldid=41623193 http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Greatest_Hits_1976%E2%80%931986&oldid=68747176

I therefore thought that you were the best person to ask if the following information (see paragraph below) is correct that is contained in the article entitled Rocket Records - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rocket_Records

"In the US and Canada, John's residency on his own label was short-lived. After only one album, Blue Moves, and a couple of singles (including the mega hits "Don't Go Breaking My Heart" and "Sorry Seems To Be The Hardest Word"), he returned to MCA. This might have been due to MCA dropping Rocket, resulting in the label's move to RCA distribution. The label was discontinued in the US in the early 1980s, then relaunching in 1995 with John's Made in England album, distributed by Island Records. 1997's The Big Picture and "Candle in the Wind" were distributed in the US by stepsister A&M Records."

The reason why I don't think this is correct is because as far as I was aware, he never left MCA (the article implies he left sometime between "Here And There" and "Don't Go Breaking My Heart" and returned sometime between the "Bite Your Lip" single and "Greatest Hits Volume II"). Also, by "a couple of singles", he actually means three.

I always thought that it was MCA - not Rocket Records - that released "Don't Go Breaking My Heart", "Blue Moves" and its two accompanying singles in the US. If this is correct, it could be possible that the person who wrote this paragraph came to this assumption because he saw the Rocket label on these four particular US releases.

Furthermore, were Rocket Records ever distributed by RCA as the person who writes this article suggests? This is the first time I've ever heard of this arrangement. That said, a Google search brought this up: http://www.popsike.com/ELTON-JOHN-GREATEST-HITS-RCA-MUSIC-SERVICE-SEALED/230464815700.html

The article also suggests that he returned to MCA as a result of "MCA dropping Rocket". In short, this person asserts that Elton John was with MCA, formed his own record label which was immediately dropped by MCA, released four records that were distributed by RCA distribution and then decided to rejoin MCA, even though they had recently dropped his record company.

Is this right?

All the best,

Standingfish.

Route 25C

Andrew, I agree with your comments with regard to NY Route 25C. I believe that the main article is incorrect in a number of ways in light of the signage, as supported by the photo. I believe that the article should be amended. Mapmann (talk) 01:55, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to New York State Route 25 may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Island. Both termini are without connections to other routes. Several other of the region's routes (for example [[NY 27]], [[NY 101]], [[NY 106]], and [[NY 107]] have similar "dead" ends at one or

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:41, 14 August 2014 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Weight of the World (Elton John song)

The article Weight of the World (Elton John song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no claim of notability, fails WP:GNG and WP:NSONGS.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 13:05, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Andrew Kirschner. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Andrew Kirschner. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)