WikiCup 2013 June newsletter

We are down to our final 16: the 2013 semi-finals are upon us. A score of 321 was required to survive round 3, further cementing this as the most competitive WikiCup yet; round 3 was survived in 2012 with 243 points, in 2011 with 76 points and in 2010 with 250 points. The change may in part be to do with the fact that more articles are now awarded bonus points, in addition to more competitive play. Reaching the final has, in the past, required 573 points (2012, a 135% increase on the score needed to reach round 4), 150 points (2011, a 97% increase) and 417 points (2010, a 72% increase). This round has seen over a third of participants claiming points for featured articles (with seven users claiming for multiple featured articles) and most users have also gained bonus points. However, the majority of points continue to come from good articles, followed by did you know articles. In this round, every content type was utilised by at least one user, proving that the WikiCup brings together content contributors from all corners of the project.

Round 3 saw a number of contributions of note.   Figureskatingfan (submissions) claimed the first featured topic points in this year's competition for her excellent work on topics related to Maya Angelou, the noted American author and poet. We have also continued to see high-importance articles improved as part of the competition:   Ealdgyth (submissions) was awarded a thoroughly well-earned 560 points for her featured article Middle Ages and 102 points for her good article Battle of Hastings. Good articles James Chadwick and Stanislaw Ulam netted   Hawkeye7 (submissions) 102 and 72 points respectively, while 72 points were awarded to   Piotrus (submissions) for each of Władysław Sikorski and Emilia Plater, both recently promoted to good article status. Collaborative efforts between WikiCup participants have continued, with, for example,   Casliber (submissions) and   Sasata (submissions) being awarded 180 points each for their featured article on Boletus luridus.

A rules reminder: content promoted between rounds can be claimed in the round after the break, but not the round before. The case in point is content promoted on the 29/30 June, which may be claimed in this round. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. We are currently seeing concern about the amount of time people have to wait for reviews, especially at GAC- if you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talkemail) and The ed17 (talkemail) 09:47, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

14:18, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Emerson Middle School (New Jersey)

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Emerson Middle School (New Jersey). Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 19:17, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

WikiProject Amusement Park Quarter 3, 2013 Newsletter

22:57, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Michael Knighton

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Michael Knighton. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 19:18, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 03 July 2013

Disambiguation link notification for July 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 64th (2nd Highland) Division, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Cameron Highlanders (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:34, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

Wikidata weekly summary #65

 
Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Article Incubator

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Article Incubator. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 20:17, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.

Views/Day Quality Title Content Headings Images Links Sources Tagged with…
2   Hampshire County Division (talk)         Add sources
2   West Sussex County Division (talk)         Add sources
92   Gordon Highlanders (talk)     Add sources
80   Battle Dress (talk)         Add sources
151   M4 Sherman variants (talk)       Add sources
3   Lincolnshire County Division (talk)         Add sources
37   Egyptian Expeditionary Force (talk)   Cleanup
33   79th Armoured Division (United Kingdom) (talk)     Cleanup
7   Queen's Own Worcestershire Hussars (talk)     Cleanup
221   XXX Corps (United Kingdom) (talk)     Expand
240   The Rifles (talk)     Expand
50   Essex Regiment (talk)   Expand
7   Rock Bay, Victoria (talk)         Unencyclopaedic
135   Tai-Pan (novel) (talk)           Unencyclopaedic
31   Force 10 From Navarone (talk)     Unencyclopaedic
38   King's Own Royal Regiment (Lancaster) (talk)     Merge
125   Line infantry (talk)         Merge
207   Royal Regiment of Scotland (talk)   Merge
79   Buffs (Royal East Kent Regiment) (talk)   Wikify
16   5th Infantry Division (India) (talk)       Wikify
106   History of the Royal Marines (talk)   Wikify
7   Frederick Joseph Loftus-Tottenham (talk)           Orphan
3   British Land Units of the First World War (talk)       Orphan
5   Salamanca order of battle (talk)           Orphan
10   British V-class submarine (talk)       Stub
15   59th (Staffordshire) Infantry Division (talk)         Stub
5   7th Infantry Brigade (United Kingdom) (talk)           Stub
5   160th (Wales) Brigade (talk)         Stub
3   Yorkshire County Division (talk)         Stub
5   42nd Infantry Brigade (United Kingdom) (talk)           Stub

Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions

We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:

Views/Day
Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
Quality
Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:

Content
Is more content needed?
Headings
Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
Images
Is the number of illustrative images about right?
Links
Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
Sources
For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:32, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

18:28, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

This Month in GLAM: June 2013

 




Headlines
Read this edition in fullSingle-page

To assist with preparing the newsletter, please visit the newsroom. Past editions may be viewed here.

Unsubscribe · Global message delivery 15:22, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Talk:Rights of Englishmen

I have started a discussion at Talk:Rights of Englishmen. No rush on this. Bearian (talk) 16:43, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of Wikipedia controversies

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of Wikipedia controversies. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 21:15, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 10 July 2013

Wikidata weekly summary #66

 
Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.

Template:InterWiki

Hi. I notice that you're the one who fully protected this template five years ago, with the stated reason of it being a "vandal target". Currently, it's transcluded to 800 pages, which normally only warrants semi-protection, not full-. I was wondering if you'd be willing to reconsider. If it weren't fully protected, there are several bold changes I'd love to make to it, and I don't think it's fair for some vandals from years ago to stop me from that. Thanks. — PinkAmpers&(Je vous invite à me parler) 00:36, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks! I've made the changes I want to, though I think it might be a good idea to leave it unprotected for a few more days, in case someone wants to revert me, or if I notice a minor false positive or negative caused by my changes, and want to fix it. (I'll also be traveling tomorrow, and starting an internship on Monday, so I might be away from my computer for some longer-than-usual stretches of time over the next 48 hours or so.)
Oh, and on the general point, I agree with you that this template is probably high risk due to the prominence of some of the articles it's used on. Then again, until yesterday any random editor could've edited Module:Authority control, transcluded to thousands upon thousands of BLPs, and not a single one thought to. (Though maybe the GNAA and Encyclopedia Dramatica guys were just too lazy to learn Lua.) — PinkAmpers&(Je vous invite à me parler) 23:30, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:List of Knesset speakers

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:List of Knesset speakers. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 22:16, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

17:28, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

James Currie

Thanks for the Who's Who reference, and could you please return to answer a second request? 2001:18E8:2:1020:3851:4713:742B:BDCC (talk) 13:22, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Fabrika automobila Priboj

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Fabrika automobila Priboj. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 23:16, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

The Signpost: 17 July 2013

Wikidata weekly summary #67

 
Here's your quick overview of what has been happening around Wikidata over the last week.

Please comment on Talk:Quantifier variance

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Talk:Quantifier variance. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 00:15, 20 July 2013 (UTC)

20:58, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.

Views/Day Quality Title Content Headings Images Links Sources Tagged with…
3   Hampshire County Division (talk)         Add sources
4   Essex County Division (talk)         Add sources
115   Infantry of the British Army (talk)   Add sources
76   Battle Dress (talk)         Add sources
3   West Sussex County Division (talk)         Add sources
16   29th Infantry Brigade (United Kingdom) (talk)         Add sources
523   Israel Defense Forces ranks (talk)   Cleanup
252   XXX Corps (United Kingdom) (talk)     Cleanup
40   Egyptian Expeditionary Force (talk)   Cleanup
245   The Rifles (talk)     Expand
47   Essex Regiment (talk)   Expand
149   I Corps (United Kingdom) (talk)     Expand
160   Soldier Soldier (talk)       Unencyclopaedic
9   Rock Bay, Victoria (talk)         Unencyclopaedic
133   Tai-Pan (novel) (talk)           Unencyclopaedic
35   King's Own Royal Regiment (Lancaster) (talk)     Merge
175   Royal Regiment of Scotland (talk)   Merge
25   39th Infantry Division (United States) (talk) Merge
36   79th Armoured Division (United Kingdom) (talk)     Wikify
23   Anglo-Portuguese Army (talk)         Wikify
77   Buffs (Royal East Kent Regiment) (talk)   Wikify
5   Salamanca order of battle (talk)           Orphan
6   Entrenching battalions (World War I) (talk)           Orphan
4   David Block (talk)           Orphan
28   7th Armored Brigade (Israel) (talk)         Stub
5   160th (Wales) Brigade (talk)         Stub
3   Northumberland County Division (talk)         Stub
3   Norfolk County Division (talk)         Stub
87   59th (Staffordshire) Infantry Division (talk)         Stub
5   Yorkshire County Division (talk)         Stub

Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions

We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:

Views/Day
Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
Quality
Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:

Content
Is more content needed?
Headings
Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
Images
Is the number of illustrative images about right?
Links
Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
Sources
For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:42, 14 July 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study on the effects of adding additional information to SuggestBot's suggestions. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information on the SuggestBot study page.

IMPORTANT CHANGES: We have modified the selection of articles SuggestBot suggests and altered the design to incorporate more information about the articles, as described in this explanation.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information.

Views/Day Quality Title Content Headings Images Links Sources Tagged with…
91   Duke of Wellington's Regiment (talk)   Add sources
339   Warlord (talk)       Add sources
3   Lincolnshire County Division (talk)         Add sources
639   Militia (talk) Add sources
33   Royal Hampshire Regiment (talk)   Add sources
31   Territorial Force (talk)         Add sources
25   5th Infantry Division (India) (talk)       Cleanup
89   History of the Royal Marines (talk)   Cleanup
6   West Riding Artillery (talk)     Cleanup
83   Lancashire Fusiliers (talk)     Expand
41   11th Infantry Brigade (United Kingdom) (talk)           Expand
71   Royal Northumberland Fusiliers (talk)   Expand
5,533   Sigmund Freud (talk) Unencyclopaedic
599   Insurgency (talk)   Unencyclopaedic
36   Force 10 From Navarone (talk)     Unencyclopaedic
58   4th Canadian Division (talk)           Merge
125   Line infantry (talk)         Merge
87   3rd Canadian Division (talk)     Merge
6   Queen's Own Worcestershire Hussars (talk)     Wikify
15   Fife and Forfar Yeomanry (talk)     Wikify
44   History of the Australian Army (talk)   Wikify
1   Order of battle for Campaign of Northern and Eastern Henan 1938 (talk)           Orphan
19   Military service by the members of the British Royal Family (talk)       Orphan
5   Alex Selsky (talk)           Orphan
9   9th Armoured Division (United Kingdom) (talk)       Stub
11   8th Armoured Division (United Kingdom) (talk)       Stub
6   Gas attack at Hulluch (talk)           Stub
6   7th Infantry Brigade (United Kingdom) (talk)           Stub
18   Support Command (British Army) (talk)           Stub
8   42nd Infantry Brigade (United Kingdom) (talk)           Stub

Changes to SuggestBot's suggestions

We have changed the number of suggested articles and which categories they are selected from. The number of stubs has been greatly reduced, the number of articles needing sources doubled, and two new categories added (orphans and unencyclopaedic articles). We have also modified the layout of the suggestions and added sortable columns with various types of information about each article. The first two columns are:

Views/Day
Daily average number of views an article's had over the past 14 days.
Quality
Predicted article quality on a 1- to 3-star scale. Placing your cursor over the stars should give you a pop-up describing the article's quality (Low/Medium/High), current assessment class, and predicted assessment class.

The method we use to predict article quality also allows us to assess whether an article might need specific types of work in order to improve its quality. The work needed might not correspond to cleanup tags added to the article, since our method is not based on those. We have added five columns reflecting this work assessment, where a red X indicates improvement is needed. Placing your cursor over an X should give you a pop-up with a short description of the work needed. The five columns seek to answer the following five questions:

Content
Is more content needed?
Headings
Does this article have an appropriate section structure?
Images
Is the number of illustrative images about right?
Links
Does this article link to enough other Wikipedia articles?
Sources
For its length, is there an appropriate number of citations to sources in this article?

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 23:29, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates

Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Featured article candidates. Should you wish to respond to the invitation, your contribution to this discussion will be very much appreciated! If in doubt, please see suggestions for responding. If you do not wish to receive these types of notices, please remove your name from Wikipedia:Feedback request service.RFC bot (talk) 01:16, 23 July 2013 (UTC)